Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Jeremy Corbyn's time is up

danny la rouge said:
I'm surprised any of her stuff is shown. It's all shit.

umm i wonder if she had done a Mp of a certain other party you would have a different opinion of her work.
Many thought it made a change from seeing all the far left shit "comedians" who are on tv nowdays.
Now they really are all shit to use your term.
I'm not a Labour or Corbyn supporter, so it's nothing to do with the clip. I've seen her do other people. I don't find any of it funny. This isn't a political position.
 
And in any case, you don't need to go to Oxford or Cambridge to be "good at words".

It is of course possible that Corbyn is such an inept Alan Partridge type that his intention was just to say: "Oh, wow, Manuel: your English is good for a foreigner. Not like these guys. Not that they're foreigners the way you are. Well, some of them were born here, but you know what I mean".

If that's what people think happened, then in some ways that's worse. He's even more incompetent and tactless than any of us realised.
xarmian ^
 
Oh, the article you linked to covers it. There's no point in any other views then. I must be being disingenuous.

Jesus.
I don't seem to be able to say anything you won't misinterpret even though you've lived here a long time and probably all your life.

The Seymour article is better than anything I can write. You don't have to engage with it, honestly or otherwise, of course.
 
I don't seem to be able to say anything you won't misinterpret even though you've lived here a long time and probably all your life.

The Seymour article is better than anything I can write. You don't have to engage with it, honestly or otherwise, of course.
Why don't you just suggest that danny la rouge doesn't understand English irony...
 
Leaving aside this latest video, regardless of ones interpretation of it, there are three strands that some people seem to find it difficult to disentangle.

1. The disingenuous labelling of all criticism of the Israeli state, its actions and policies, as necessarily anti-Semitic.

2. The actual anti-semitism that exists on the left, often associated with Palestinian solidarity (which does not have to be anti-Semitic); the blind eye turned to it; the dodgy alliances thereby arrived at.

3. The use made of both of the above by anti Corbyn forces inside and outside of the Labour Party.

Corbyn and his team are at the very least accident-prone on dealing with this. They are especially inept at dealing with 1 and 3 because of 2.

We've all seen 2. It does us no favours to keep saying "but 1" or "but 3". At some point, we on the broader left, and the Labour left and leadership in particular, need to deal with 2, and decisively.
 
That interview reminds me of this gem of a suggestion the other day.
Examine their records- if they're politically impure, you can ignore what they say about this subject and conclude they're lying. :thumbs:
bastani.png
 
That interview reminds me of this gem of a suggestion the other day.
Examine their records- if they're politically impure, you can ignore what they say about this subject and conclude they're lying. :thumbs:
View attachment 145519
perhaps you should reread the tweet.

he says nothing about lying. he says nothing about ignoring them.

he talks, rather, about not conceding to right-wing ultra-nationalists.

it's really rather different.

most people here would, i believe, agree with me that right-wing ultra-nationalists are indeed politically impure - or to put it another way, their politics are shit.

remedial english beckons, bimble.
 
He says that 'examining the records' of the 68 rabbis should have been the first response to their letter. To check if their concerns should be taken in good faith or dismissed as smears. Maybe you agree that was a good idea. I can't really engage with this at the mo though, will leave it to others with a better sense of irony.
 
He says that 'examining the records' of the 68 rabbis should have been the first response to their letter. To check if their concerns should be taken in good faith or dismissed as smears. Maybe you agree that was a good idea. I can't really engage with this at the mo though, will leave it to others with a better sense of irony.
this isn't about your actual agreement or otherwise with the tweet, it's with understanding what the bloody thing in fact says. maybe you don't think it would be a good idea to understand it before deciding whether to agree with it.
 
Its really difficult this, it feels like we're just completely unable to understand each other. I don't need English classes thanks Pickmans model but will try to leave it alone.
 
He says that 'examining the records' of the 68 rabbis should have been the first response to their letter. To check if their concerns should be taken in good faith or dismissed as smears. Maybe you agree that was a good idea. I can't really engage with this at the mo though, will leave it to others with a better sense of irony.
it's so hard to tell the difference between when you don't understand something and you make out people are saying something completely different from what they are, and when you're not understanding something ironically and making out people are saying something completely different from what they are.
 
That Eddie Dempsey video people are sharing round like it's some incredible slam-dunk is dreadful. Embarrassing.

Dont agree with ED on everything ( by a long stretch), but what do you find 'dreadful' / 'embarassing' here ?

On a separate note, that Sky interviewer seems to be turning into one of the more sensible news journos around at the moment, actually lets people speak / debate etc
 
He says that 'examining the records' of the 68 rabbis should have been the first response to their letter. To check if their concerns should be taken in good faith or dismissed as smears. Maybe you agree that was a good idea. I can't really engage with this at the mo though, will leave it to others with a better sense of irony.

point.gif

Ah, no time to engage but snuck an indirect smear in there of your own because you haven't been agreed with outright. :facepalm: Just as long as you don't send me any more manipulative PMs, i suppose I should be happy.
 
Frank Field jumps before he is pushed then. He's always been a monumental arsehole so I can't say I'm going to miss him. Although, he is standing as an indy so maybe he will still be about as his local support must be pretty stuanch. I don't know. Either way he's a prick.
 
Back
Top Bottom