Unfortunately it's the nature of criticism -even informed, even-handed constructive criticism - that some people will react to it in such a way, and attempt to turn the critic into a subject to be censured.
With some people - Philips among them - there's no utility to refining the criticism, or softening the language, because whatever is said, if it's even mildly critical of them, they'll turn it into an attack and react accordingly.
So we are left with a quandary that only really leaves us two choices, if we wish to criticise, and do so effectively (by whatever gauge you'remeasuring "effectiveness"): We can back completely off of such people, and watch as their gobshitery reaches new heights of self-delusion, or we can continue criticising, aware of how they'll react.
Personally, I prefer the latter to the former, whatever social media storm gets stirred up by the soi-disant victim.