I love that the coup attempt is having the reverse effect the establishment wanted by creating a surge of active support for Corbyn.The numbers at the corbyn rallies seem to indicate that Corbyn's support base has increased since the last leadership elections. Take the Leeds event last night as an example, last time he sold out the royal armouries biggest hall, this time he sold it out and had 1500 people outside the place who couldn't get in.
And that's on the same day as he spoke at a huge rally in Hull, another in York and had 1500 people marching in support of him in Newcastle. So it's not like the supporters were being bussed in from surrounding areas too much.
I can't remember any politician in my lifetime being able to draw anything like those crowds to events around the country as Corbyn.
Someone elsewhere said that Michael Foot was also drawing big crowds but then lost badly.... conveniently missing the role in that played by those who left Labour to form the SDP. Obviously that was Foot's fault, just as Corbyn's being blamed now for potentially splitting the labour party, rather than those who're considering breaking away.
I can't remember any UK politician having this effect either. You generally go to pelt tomatoes at the guys.
The Michael Foot situation is not to be compared straight. Firstly, we didn't have social media then. Secondly, Thatcher had a huge boost from the Falklands conflict. Thirdly, privitisation, market-worshipping, Thatcherist policy may have resonated well in the 1980s, but we are all wiser now. Things like British Rail don't seem like such a bad idea. Nor does the idea of 'society'. Maybe the baby was thrown out with the bathwater. Fourthly, while Foot may have been a great intellectual and orator, Corbyn has some utterly exceptional qualities which I doubt Foot had - he has an incredible talent for relating to people and reducing complex matters to simple ones (so much better than appearing obviously 'intellectual'). This shines through despite him maybe a bit rough around the edges and not a slick presenter and however much he might get hammered in PMQs.
Was Michael Foot ever described (however incorrectly) as a 'cult leader'?