Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Jeremy Corbyn's time is up

Someone mentioned that they will keep on making leadership challengers until corbyn goes. Can they really do that? Would there be a majority in the PLP for such a move? Couldn't they be expelled/deselected for such malicious action - effectively deliberately sabotaging the party?
Its clearly a fight to the death and the Blairites will do anything to stop the membership and corbyn - but is this a realistic scenario?
once a year before conference is how I read the rules on that.

If they refuse to follow the party whip continuously in the meantime then that should put them at risk of having the whip removed, though Corbyn is on a bit of a sticky wicket with that one given his rebellious history. Some sort of bringing the party into disrepute charge could also probably be made against MPs found leaking to the press and briefing against the leadership.

But that presumably all depends on the make up of the NEC and willingness of the NEC to take on the PLP plotters and support the leadership that the party members elect (assuming corbyn is elected again).
 
so if I join LGBT Labour for £8 a year it means I can vote, according to the Independent article?I thought new members couldn't? (i joined the party last week)
 
so if I join LGBT Labour for £8 a year it means I can vote, according to the Independent article?I thought new members couldn't? (i joined the party last week)

So they say. Not sure if they'll have a chance to close that loophole, sure they'll try though.
 
so if I join LGBT Labour for £8 a year it means I can vote, according to the Independent article?I thought new members couldn't? (i joined the party last week)
'Probably', though I expect plenty on the right are scurrying round as we speak to close these 'loopholes'.
 
It would be interesting to know when the right came up with this cunning plan to restrict the party electorate. Perhaps they've not really thought it through. :eek:
 
I sit with despair and am not sure really. The party have not covered themselves in glory, what with all the fighting
back stabbing Etc. I really wish that all had not happened. The should be as strong as they have ever been right not,
ready to hit the tories hard and win the next election. Right now this is not very likly. However, I have a possibly misguided
admiration for Corbyn, the way he has taken it on the chin as opposed to rolling over and quitting. So fair play to him on that one. BUT, if he really was the right man for the job, none of this fighting would have happened.
Mixed blessings.
hash tag are you sure about that?

I think you have to be very careful with this. This is logic that makes one go along with the crowd. It can turn a small group of bullies into a large group of bullies.

Let me give you an example to illustrate. Take Christophe Bassons. A cyclist whose record was unremarkable, except for the fact that he was perhaps the only clean rider on the tour during the reign of Lance Armstrong. Looking back with hindsight it seems the man was practically a saint, however he was horrendously hounded and had to quit Christophe Bassons - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Was he the wrong cyclist? No.

You can find many others of whistleblowers, or otherwise well-motivated people who come against harassment because they are threatening an order of things.

You have to ask yourself, do the attacks make any sense? If it does not, maybe there is something else behind it all.

Might Corbyn be a threat to an established order of things? I very much think so.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom