editor
hiraethified
You really are going to have to wind your neck in a bit because this kind of abuse is really over the top.You spineless cunt.
You really are going to have to wind your neck in a bit because this kind of abuse is really over the top.You spineless cunt.
I'm afraid I don't see the relevance of this question.
You really are going to have to wind your neck in a bit because this kind of abuse is really over the top.
There is no kid, is there?
BBC reports a lot of stop and search going on in London and some arrests of black block types
@CourtNewsUK (on twitter) said:Trial at Southwark Crown Court not sitting after juror refuses to cross picket line #solidarity #j30
the scheme is regularly actuarially reviewed. the latest review was meant top be two years ago, but it seems to have been dropped as embarrassing (ie, its still in surplus). Results of the last review are around, here
The notional investment returns shown in Tables D1 and D2 are based on a rate of 3.5% in excess of price inflation (the current rate of return under the SCAPE methodology). There are, however, no actual investments underlying the balance in the Account; in effect, the balance represents a liability of the Exchequer.
Hmm, might need some help to interpret that document but doesn't it say that teachers contributed £14.2bn and their employer £33.1bn, and that as of 2004 the scheme was £3.3bn in the red? That looks like an employer subsidy to me (not saying it's wrong, only that it appears teachers own contributions are insufficient to cover their pension liabilities under the terms of the scheme).
Happy to stand corrected though.
Teachers pensions are covered by the amount teachers pay in.
yes, the employers pay in as well. which is rather common.
So strictly speaking teacher's pensions are not covered by the amount teachers pay in but rely on contributions from their employer (which is presumably funded through taxation).
Not just that, but the account with the government in which the contributions are stored is credited with interest at 3.5% above inflation. That's about 8% this year, far more than any real pension scheme could realise, and represents a huge additional liability in addition to the employers contribution.
So what's happening with the 4 o'clock demo?
Typical striker's mentality. "I'm alright, sod the poor git who actually pays my wages".