They also sent this email about the day of the chemical attack, just to remind us to oppose foreign intervention, which obviously was the most important point to hammer home right at that time. Literally at 18:32 on the Tuesday.
Unions pay - Rees et al take it. Like greedy underfed whippets.
I might be prepared to spend some of my precious time answering non-loaded non leading questions, however you appear to be a bit stupid so it doesn't look like that's going to happen.
What idiocy is this now? So, you are supposedly the resident expert on what's going on in Syria, I've heard Ryan Dawson talking on the subject and he appears (to me) to know what he's talking about moreso than the regular news correspondents. I'm not sure why you've suddenly jumped over to "holocaust denier". What has that got to do with Syria? You're jumping all over the place like a Mexican jumping bean, enough to clear that idiot Trumps wall.
How is that thread relevant to the alleged gas attack in Syria? If you went to idiot school, you'd be top of the class. I'm not even going to bother with your other links, you are clearly out of your depth although you claim to be knowledgeable. If you can't respond with anything coherent or on topic then don't bother.
I take it you're in the "ASSAD DID IT!" posse. As I said to your leader butchersbitch, if you are not able to debate properly and can only conjur up emotional outbursts then maybe this thread is not for you. Just a thought.
How is Dawson's form as a racist conspiraloon irrelevant to you quoting him as a source for your loony views? It strikes me as very relevant.
My stance is that I absolutely do not support the actions taken by the Trump administration and by the previous insanely criminal warmonger presidents. It is their actions which has created the big mess in the first place and as far as I'm concerned they cannot be trusted.
Yet another person that is unable to debate the subject and so goes off on irrelevant tangents. Suffice to say I don't agree with your assessment.
aren't the Morning Star lot part of the STWC? didn't seem too concerned about military intervention by outside forces when they were crowing about the 'liberation' of Aleppo
Great stuff. I won't answer these leading questions because they will expose my true positions.
I find the idea that the footage we have seen was shot with a smartphone risible. The moving footage looks to me shot with a steadycam in particularPS: I had accidentally attached a file of a clear picture of my middle finger to above post, as I had intended to send that to captain "remarkably slick photography" to showcase what can be done with a second hand phone for 20 quid:
So if eagle eyed urbanites spotted that, that was what that was about.
And what would that prove?
I don't see people on this thread requiring 'proof' before concluding that Assad was responsible for this atrocity, or even the results of any independent investigation, so not sure why this question is being asked.
So.. whoever is behind this false flag operation did a pretty good job but gave the game away by mistakenly not using shakey camera foootage. Ok.
I absolutely do not believe that is smartphone footage however processed. I believe it is from a professional video camera with a steadycam.
If you are dumb enough to take such an incident as face value bimble, you aren't going to care too much about the quality of the footage.
Go back to your FOTL bullshit.
Just wait until we break out the hologram 720 degree cameras mate. Minds will be blown and hearts will weep.
Was just about to ask how the fotlering was going.
