Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Is it worrying that EDL members freedoms are restricted

Do EDL members deserve restrictions on their democratic rights

  • Yes, facists deserve to have their rights restricted

    Votes: 10 23.3%
  • No, democratic rights should be universal and apply to fascists too

    Votes: 31 72.1%
  • Don't know

    Votes: 2 4.7%

  • Total voters
    43
Interesting article here from SPIKED

banned from attending or helping to organise any demonstration, meeting or gathering held by his political organisation or even visiting its website for 10 years. In addition, he was banned from travelling by train anywhere in the UK and from entering a mosque, meeting room, school or cultural centre.

http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php/site/article/10290/

What do people think, obviously the EDL are repulsive but this is draconian punishments being handed down to their members.

hmm, should hate organisations and their representatives be allowed to perpetuate their message and kick off trouble wherever they turn up? Definately a moral minefield there alright :facepalm: :p
 
its an awkward one - should fascists be able to march into asian areas with the sole intention of causing trouble?

Whilst i have no doubt that the EDL want to end up in a valiant punch up with Muslims and UAF they aren't marching anywhere , least of all asian areas,are they? They have static demos in Town Centres .

The phrase Asian areas isn't particularly helpful either.
 
Whilst i have no doubt that the EDL want to end up in a valiant punch up with Muslims and UAF they aren't marching anywhere , least of all asian areas,are they? They have static demos in Town Centres .

The phrase Asian areas isn't particularly helpful either.

Its sadly pretty factual though. The ghettoisation of certain areas is a fact.
 
The phrase Asian areas isn't particularly helpful either.

What exactly is the problem with the phrase?

Kilburn, Cricklewood, Willesden etc were often referred to as 'Irish areas' of London up until the 80's.

Same in the 60's and 70's with Gosford Street/Hillfields in Coventry, Digbeth in Brum, and various areas of Luton, Manchester, Leeds etc etc. Don't remember the phrase 'Irish area' ever being contentious and indeed was in common parlance amongst the left of the day.

Never meant that nobody else lived there, just that there was a high proportion of Irish people in them.
 
I suppose it's to do with the fact that unlike the word Irish, Asian describes neither culture or nationality - only skin colour. Which tells us not a lot about those who live there.
 
What exactly is the problem with the phrase?

Kilburn, Cricklewood, Willesden etc were often referred to as 'Irish areas' of London up until the 80's.

Same in the 60's and 70's with Gosford Street/Hillfields in Coventry, Digbeth in Brum, and various areas of Luton, Manchester, Leeds etc etc. Don't remember the phrase 'Irish area' ever being contentious and indeed was in common parlance amongst the left of the day.

Never meant that nobody else lived there, just that there was a high proportion of Irish people in them.

Irish is a bit more specific. Asian is too broad a term.
 
not read the whole thread.

imo, I don't mind 'the people'the community however you want to put it, restricting the rights of fascists, but I don't support the state doing it.
 
Back
Top Bottom