Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Is it left wing to tolerate crack dealers?

darren redparty said:
Also there seems to be a cuddly relationship between the dealers and local police as they provide the pigs with a reliable source of information.
.

Nail being hit on head, I am sure the bribes help as well.
 
taffboy gwyrdd said:
Not related directly to the thread, but this is the best site on crack I've ever come across.
Please read it and be in no doubt of the horrors of this drug.

http://www.crackreality.com

that site is right wing nonsense

Crack is very dangerous because it is an easy transition from marijuana

Crack users LIKE this lifestyle. That's why they are there.

It seems as though there is something in a woman's personality that causes them to be more easily addicted.
 
darren redparty said:
police,who in our area are more than happy for the dealers to operate as they are 'contained' and not spreading out into the middle class areas- where a great deal of their business comes from.Also there seems to be a cuddly relationship between the dealers and local police as they provide the pigs with a reliable source of information.
This is pretty much spot-on. Having worked and lived in an inner-city area with open dealing and prostitution I have had police admit to me that the area was an informal tolerance zone.
What's interesting is that the policy is entirely in the hands of the police, not the politicians who seem unable or unwilling to do anything whatsoever about policing.
Neither do the voluntary sector/regeneration gang that has appeared in the area. Since 1997 the area has received £50m from New Deal for Communities and a few million pounds from Neighbourhood Renewal and the Home Office's Community Cohesion Programme.
The area is awash with community safety officers, community safety partnerships and a community safety unit. A whole community safety industry in fact. All, we are assured, under the control of the community.
But strangely the blatant and destructive police tolerance policy goes on unacknowledged let alone challenged by this alliance of police, politicians and career liberals.
Before the left even starts talking about tolerance perhaps it first needs to take back major areas of public policy making from the cops?
 
darren redparty said:
what is this liberal 'no vigilante justice' shit?
basically following this line means leaving it to the police,who in our area are more than happy for the dealers to operate as they are 'contained' and not spreading out into the middle class areas- where a great deal of their business comes from.Also there seems to be a cuddly relationship between the dealers and local police as they provide the pigs with a reliable source of information.
those of us who have to endure this shite are offered the choice of collaborating with the authorities through neighbourhood watch type initiatives or the vigilantism that so many urbanites and the police abhore.
collective self defence to these parasitic scum is the only real alternative.
totally agree darren- good post.
 
Great, so we're all agreed then: vigilante justic is the way forward for Brixton! Where should we start? I suppose we'll need some uniforms first, anyone else got a black shirt stashed in their closet? And I suppose we can expect a tiny bit of resistance, so we should probably be armed too. Who's coming on patrol down Coldharbour Lane Saturday night? Don't all rush at once...
 
phildwyer,

Have you read the IWCA articles linked on post #27, page 2 of this thread? They explain better than I can some of the concerns working class people have about drug dealing and crime in general.
 
Of course its not left wing to tolerate crack dealers. What hopefully is left wing though, is an understanding that people's life chances are influenced by the material conditions they find themselves in and an acknowledgement of the social and economic conditions that lead people into problematic drug use and/or dealing. Just coming out with bullshit like "they're all parasitic scum" is idiotic and counterproductive. Undoubtedly some are parasitic scum. However, others are extremely damaged people trying to support their own habits.
To be honest, I find it extremely depressing when I see people on the left coming out with the same kind of knee-jerk reactionary bollocks that wouldn't look out of place in the pages of the Daily Mail.
 
Blagsta said:
Of course its not left wing to tolerate crack dealers. What hopefully is left wing though, is an understanding that people's life chances are influenced by the material conditions they find themselves in and an acknowledgement of the social and economic conditions that lead people into problematic drug use and/or dealing. Just coming out with bullshit like "they're all parasitic scum" is idiotic and counterproductive. Undoubtedly some are parasitic scum. However, others are extremely damaged people trying to support their own habits.
To be honest, I find it extremely depressing when I see people on the left coming out with the same kind of knee-jerk reactionary bollocks that wouldn't look out of place in the pages of the Daily Mail.

Top post, Blagsta.
 
Communities tolerate drug dealers from within their own community, a report by Kings College, London.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4476600.stm

Quote from the report..

"The solution isn't simply a policing solution but you have to tackle the underlying deprivation.

"This is a complex of factors: 30 years ago there were no class A drug markets in deprived areas to speak of."
 
1. The spurious “war on drugs,” with the attendant, media-fuelled outrage against “parasitic scum” dealers has been, is being, and will be used by property speculators and their allies in the press to drive the poor out of newly-desirable inner city neighborhoods like Brixton.

2. Blaming the dealers for the problem is like the USA blaming Colombia for its drugs problem. Attacking the dealers is like the USA “intervening” in Colombia with the drug war as an excuse.

3. No-one has yet explained to me what is so horrifically unbearable about having drug dealers living or working in your vicinity. If anything, they probably keep the neighborhoods safe, not wanting their customers to get robbed. it’s the *users* who commit the crime. Now *that’s* an idea, let’s have a really tough crackdown on drug *users.* Although something tells me that plan might not be so popular around here…
 
Is there anything more exploitative and capitalistic than dealing crack?

No phil, it's not the dealers fault at all is it? They're the innocent ones in all this.
 
phildwyer said:
3. No-one has yet explained to me what is so horrifically unbearable about having drug dealers living or working in your vicinity.
Maybe it's something to do with the increased likelihood of being mugged/robbed or randomly assaulted by their crackhead customers, having crack prostitutes using your doorway for sex with customers or having to step over dangerous used needles on the kids play area outside?

There's only one street in London that I won't walk down at night and guess what - it's where the crack dealers operate!
 
3. No-one has yet explained to me what is so horrifically unbearable about having drug dealers living or working in your vicinity.

You might also want to ask this to someone other than a lower east side punk/anarchist/artist etc.
 
knopf said:
Watch yourself, tobes -- you're agreeing with anarchists all over the shop today. ;)


When it comes to drugs I would not trust a local officer with information about dealers. Based on past experience they must walk around with their eyes shut or doing a Nelson touch and pocketing a big wedge.
The only time I have managed to get some serious law enforcement done is go out of the county to another law enforcement agency altogether. (Who trust the local uniformed plod when it comes to drugs as little as I do)
 
phildwyer said:
3. No-one has yet explained to me what is so horrifically unbearable about having drug dealers living or working in your vicinity. If anything, they probably keep the neighborhoods safe, not wanting their customers to get robbed. it’s the *users* who commit the crime. Now *that’s* an idea, let’s have a really tough crackdown on drug *users.* Although something tells me that plan might not be so popular around here…
The following is a quote from:
National Criminal Intelligence Service
UK Threat Assessment: The Threat from Serious and Organised Crime 2004/5 - 2005/6
Chapter 7 CRIMINAL POSSESSION AND USE OF FIREARMS
Link: http://www.ncis.co.uk/ukta.asp
Links to the Class A drugs trade

7.12 Intelligence suggests that the recent rise in the possession and use of firearms in the UK is driven predominantly by the trade in Class A drugs (especially crack cocaine) and the associated gang culture at street level. Criminal gangs often control their share of the drug market through violence, implied or actual, and use firearms for a show of strength, to recover debts, or for self-protection. A major factor behind the increase is the perception among these criminals that their rivals are now similarly armed.

7.13 Firearms offences related to the Class A drugs trade are concentrated in metropolitan areas, such as London, Manchester and the West Midlands, particularly in innercity areas with high levels of deprivation. However, as the drugs markets in these areas have become saturated, or in some instances as a result of successful law enforcement tactics, a number of groups have moved their criminal business to smaller towns and cities. In these locations, firearms are used mainly to control and threaten, and tend not to be discharged. However, where newly arrived criminal groups have threatened the position of existing dealers, possession and use of firearms has begun to escalate. The police in Thames Valley, Nottinghamshire, Derbyshire, South Yorkshire, Humberside, Lincolnshire and Northamptonshire have reported increases in firearms related violence and the proliferation of firearms possession among criminals, linked to increased tension between rival drugs gangs.

The gun culture of street gangs

7.14 In some areas, a gun culture has been adopted by certain street gangs, in which possession of firearms is related to image and machismo, and gang members appear quick to resort to firearms to settle disputes over drugs 'turf', perceived instances of 'disrespect', music promotion or women. Increased possession of firearms by lower level criminals, and their apparent readiness to use them, has led to an increase in random or uncontrolled shootings and to 'tit-for-tat' revenge shootings...
Also:
3.2 While more research is needed, there are strong indications that many ‘problematic’ drug users (as distinct from ‘recreational’ users) acquire a significant proportion, perhaps half, of the income used to pay for their drugs through low-level crime, including property crime, benefit fraud, drug dealing and prostitution.
 
Interesting to read chapter 3 as well.

As you need to download a .pdf document I hope noone minds if I paraphrase and quote the bits of it that relate to cocaine and also specifically to crack:

Its says there is an estimated 35 to 45 tonnes of cocaine imported per year, mostly coming from Colombia with bulk crossing the Atlantic in large multi-tonne shipments bound for Spain and Portugal. It says that secondary distribution from mainland Europe to the UK is organised primarily from Spain and the Netherlands via HGVs routed overland to the Channel and North Sea ports with Holland also playing a significant role both as "a point of entry into the EU for South American cocaine, arriving by sea and air, and as a distribution point for cocaine first landed in Spain or Portugal".

"The bulk of the secondary distribution from the Netherlands to the UK is organised by British criminals. The relationships between South American, Spanish, Dutch, British and other criminals appear increasingly fluid, with the different ethnic groups working together more closely. As a result, the ownership of cocaine as it transits Europe en-route to the UK is increasingly complex."

"At the wholesale level, cocaine distribution appears to be controlled mainly by British Caucasians and Colombians, although there is evidence of the
involvement of other groups. Many of the British Caucasian groups involved import and distribute other Class A and Class C drugs, and in some cases smuggled cigarettes. Cocaine powder is used mostly as a ‘recreational’ drug at ‘street-level’ (the point of sale to low-level dealers and users). A number of wholesale importers and distributors own or have some involvement with pubs and clubs, and use them as outlets."


...and more specifically to crack
Distribution of crack cocaine within the UK

3.36 Within the UK, crack cocaine was previously understood to be produced mainly in small quantities just above street-level and quickly sold on to street-level dealers and users. Whilst this is still occurring, crack cocaine is now also being sold in multi-kilo amounts to local criminal groups by others acting as wholesale producers and distributors. The profitability of crack cocaine relative to cocaine powder, and the ease with which it can be produced, mean that those involved in the wholesale importation of cocaine powder will find it attractive to convert it to crack cocaine for onward sale,
rather than selling the powder to lower-level crack cocaine producers. The most significant distribution hubs for crack cocaine appear to be London, Birmingham, Liverpool and Wolverhampton; although Bristol, Nottingham and Leeds are also important, with crack cocaine becoming increasingly available throughout the UK, including in rural areas.

3.37 Intelligence indicates that the crack cocaine trade within the UK is becoming complex and dynamic. In addition to the involvement of West Indian groups, the crack cocaine market now involves British Caucasian, West African, and South Asian criminals and groups. All these groups work both independently and collaboratively (and crack cocaine is frequently sold with heroin). In addition to being sold at street level, there are indications
of crack cocaine being distributed at a wholesale level, and being imported in wholesale amounts, albeit in small amounts (mainly via post).

3.38 As well as supplying cocaine powder, some of which may be converted into crack cocaine within the UK, British Caucasian criminals are involved in the distribution of crack cocaine within the UK, particularly at street level. West African criminal groups, based mostly in the South East of England though with influence elsewhere, appear to play an increasingly significant part in the supply of both cocaine and crack cocaine. They are involved mostly in importing cocaine from South America and West Africa to sell to multi-kilo buyers, including to groups involved in supplying crack, although there is intelligence indicating that West African groups are also selling crack cocaine at wholesale level. The involvement of South Asian criminals in supplying crack cocaine has also been reported in some areas. Their historical involvement in supplying heroin means that involvement with crack cocaine makes good business sense if the street dealers and users are, to a large extent, the same for both drugs.

3.39 There is intelligence to indicate that some Colombian groups are becoming involved in the conversion of cocaine into crack cocaine and then selling it in wholesale amounts. It is too early to say whether this represents a new trend.
http://www.ncis.co.uk/ukta.asp (see chapter 3) (nb need to download ,pdf document)
 
phildwyer said:
1. The spurious “war on drugs,” with the attendant, media-fuelled outrage against “parasitic scum” dealers has been, is being, and will be used by property speculators and their allies in the press to drive the poor out of newly-desirable inner city neighborhoods like Brixton.

2. Blaming the dealers for the problem is like the USA blaming Colombia for its drugs problem. Attacking the dealers is like the USA “intervening” in Colombia with the drug war as an excuse.

3. No-one has yet explained to me what is so horrifically unbearable about having drug dealers living or working in your vicinity. If anything, they probably keep the neighborhoods safe, not wanting their customers to get robbed. it’s the *users* who commit the crime. Now *that’s* an idea, let’s have a really tough crackdown on drug *users.* Although something tells me that plan might not be so popular around here…



As if we needed one, here we have yet another perfect reminder of why the working class will have nothing whatsoever to do with self-styled 'libertarian' radicals.
 
A middle class person not accustomed to or exposed to certain realities faced by working class communities perhaps?
 
editor said:
Maybe it's something to do with the increased likelihood of being mugged/robbed or randomly assaulted by their crackhead customers, having crack prostitutes using your doorway for sex with customers or having to step over dangerous used needles on the kids play area outside?
Indeed. And then there's the obnoxious type of dealers who get shirty at members of the public who attempt to innocently walk through "their" territory on their way to somewhere else. The dealer in such cases has "decided" that that patch of street is only for the use of themselves and their customers - and woe betide the pedestrian who has the affront to try get to where they're going if it means stepping on "their" territory. :rolleyes:

Drug dealers as protectors of the community? Do me a favour! :rolleyes:
 
I think there's little point in comparing the US and UK experiences of drug-related crime and violence since the two societies are hugely different, not least the easy availability of firearms to everyone in the US.

I remember going to NY before Giuliani launched the Zero Tolerance approach and went, neighbourhood by neighbourhood, through NY using a technique that invovled communities through the punishment of any an all petty crime - vandalism, ticket avoidance on the Metro (which saw assualts and robberies fall dramatically), even littering and this led to communities feeling better about the physical locale - no broken windows on houses, no shit all over the streets - and this in turn led to a turnaround for many communities in both their own debilitating drug use and the dealers, which is why NY is a much safer place to be now then it was 15 years ago.
 
kyser_soze said:
I think there's little point in comparing the US and UK experiences of drug-related crime and violence since the two societies are hugely different, not least the easy availability of firearms to everyone in the US.

I remember going to NY before Giuliani launched the Zero Tolerance approach and went, neighbourhood by neighbourhood, through NY using a technique that invovled communities through the punishment of any an all petty crime - vandalism, ticket avoidance on the Metro (which saw assualts and robberies fall dramatically), even littering and this led to communities feeling better about the physical locale - no broken windows on houses, no shit all over the streets - and this in turn led to a turnaround for many communities in both their own debilitating drug use and the dealers, which is why NY is a much safer place to be now then it was 15 years ago.
I'm no fan of Giuliani or zero tolerance but he does show what can happen when a politician starts to set the agenda and force the cops to follow it.
Can anyone think of a similar example anywhere in the UK?
 
maybe toby jug could invite some of the boys who ran action on drugs over to the mainland. could probably even get a lottery grant if they promise to put up some nice murals :)
There's nothing life enhancing about crack houses and street dealers if the police won't deal with it whats exactly wrong with the community defending itself?
or though you could be subtle about walk into the local cop shop with a tame journalist and 50 applications for shotgun certificates :eek:.
That I'd imagine would light a fire under the local coppers.
if being particularly evil invite the torygraph along as there running some sot of cull a burgular campign at worse you'd get the tory graph to spring for a decent lunch.
Clay pigeon shootings an established sport there must be a range near london :D
 
darren redparty said:
what is this liberal 'no vigilante justice' shit?
basically following this line means leaving it to the police,who in our area are more than happy for the dealers to operate as they are 'contained' and not spreading out into the middle class areas- where a great deal of their business comes from.Also there seems to be a cuddly relationship between the dealers and local police as they provide the pigs with a reliable source of information.
those of us who have to endure this shite are offered the choice of collaborating with the authorities through neighbourhood watch type initiatives or the vigilantism that so many urbanites and the police abhore.
collective self defence to these parasitic scum is the only real alternative.
Good post, but what would you suggest, specifically? I don't mean to be combative about this, but there seems to be a lack fo specifics here.
 
Back
Top Bottom