Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Is it left wing to tolerate crack dealers?

then decriminalise crack instead of moaning, get the addicts off the streets and in surgeries...after all, if you drive them out of your area you are directly condemning other people. addicts are where the money is.

as for people worried about their house price...tough.
 
Hanoipete said:
then decriminalise crack instead of moaning, get the addicts off the streets and in surgeries...after all, if you drive them out of your area you are directly condemning other people. addicts are where the money is.

as for people worried about their house price...tough.
Click to expand...

I'm not moaning, if you can't offer any sensible solutions don't bother...

I'm not in the goverment so I can't decriminalise anything.

BTW it would have been a good idea to read the thread instead of just chucking hotch potch shite around
 
aint hotch potch. if you dont decriminalise then you only move the problem from area A to area B. which is what will always happen as no govt will decriminalise. its utterly hopeless unless you decrim.

you cant stop drugs use only regulate it. even with huge resources drugs are unstopppable, see the USA as an example.

but thanks for the mild abuse, i did realise you werent in the govt.
 
Hanoipete said:
aint hotch potch. if you dont decriminalise then you only move the problem from area A to area B. which is what will always happen as no govt will decriminalise. its utterly hopeless unless you decrim.

you cant stop drugs use only regulate it. even with huge resources drugs are unstopppable, see the USA as an example.

but thanks for the mild abuse, i did realise you werent in the govt.
Click to expand...


The thing is this has been discussed on this thread, at the moment the "cures" you suggest are not available....


as for mild abuse, coming in with your first post, on the end of a well debated
subject with a "non" solution deserves the "mild abuse" I gave you.
 
theres no solution to drugs apart from decrimming. none. doesnt exist. hard luck. sorry. but without it everyone should stop moaning and get used to it.

crack and H need to come from doctrors, or dealers will be about on a road somewhere. you'll only move the problem around, like whores. regulate it and accept it. like alcohol.

is it left wing? who cares? whats left wing?
 
I agree, it's a shame the people in charge can't see.

anyway, do you agree with phildywer that it is rascist not to tolerate them? ;)
 
racist? er...dont think thats relevent.

i think (various) powerful people know it only too well. it (criminalising drugs) is a great spanner to work ordoinary people of any self-perceived class background over with. in the US it is obviously a way to attack non white people and poorer white folk. its very successful. its got plausible deniability all over it...drug laws are really class war by the top 0.5% on everyone else...

crack dealers can be total fucking cunts though dont get me wrong. but then so are politicians. as ever ordianry folk lose, but some are just a bit dim and play along with one side or the other...anyway...im going to watch the sporanos ;)
 
Hanoipete said:
theres no solution to drugs apart from decrimming. none. doesnt exist. hard luck. sorry. but without it everyone should stop moaning and get used to it.

crack and H need to come from doctrors, or dealers will be about on a road somewhere. you'll only move the problem around, like whores. regulate it and accept it. like alcohol.

is it left wing? who cares? whats left wing?
Click to expand...
Moving the problem down the road can actually be a good thing: for example into an industrial area or a commercial area that is largely shut up and deserted at night, or to an area which is better served by emergency/health/drugs outreach services.

If there is a major problem that takes over a town centre that is being used at night time (for example for buses, tubes and trains) or a residential area or an area where there are vunerable people passing by (due to the road layout) then a lot more people will be negatively impacted by drug dealing and use than if it was pushed "down the road" to a location where it had less impact, even if it is true that legalisation, regulation and more services for users etc would be a better long term solution.
 
then decriminalise crack instead of moaning, get the addicts off the streets and in surgeries...after all, if you drive them out of your area you are directly condemning other people. addicts are where the money is.
Click to expand...

This is bollocks and you know it. Nobody should have to uproot themselves just because someone else wants to take drugs. It's not down to individuals to change the law, decriminalisation is a massive, massive undertaking. There is a laissez faire attitude here that wouldn't be tolerated in other scenarios. False radicalism. I am not against decriminalisation necessarily, but I'm against bullshit.
 
TeeJay said:
Moving the problem down the road can actually be a good thing: for example into an industrial area or a commercial area that is largely shut up and deserted at night,
Click to expand...

Good point. And for some reason, what springs to mind as the most deserted area in the evening/night/weekend is the City of London. ;)
 
Hehehe :D

Well it is nice and central after all, has lots of cctv (in case people get mugged) and it is a shame to waste such a valuable social space for so many hours every night.

Might need to lay on a bit more late night public transport however.
 
i'd imagine the crack dealers won't be to keen on running the ring of steel.
allededgly the checkpoints did roaring buisness in picking up dealers off to raves and others taking shortcuts not many black members of the ira :confused:
 
But if the Met decided to push all dealing in that direction they wouldn't start screwing up their own strategy would they? The idea would be to remove street dealing from any areas being used by anyone else (eg residential or night time businesses) and into areas that are typically deserted and unused at night time.

I can't really think of any areas of London that are unused during the daytime - just ex-industrial wasteland of which there is hardly any in inner London areas.
 
phildwyer said:
Because, among many other reasons, they hold demonstratıons outsıde pubs where they thınk drugs dealıng takes place. No better than fascısts ıf you ask me.
Click to expand...

If these pubs are used to sell crack and smack then whats wrong with protesting outside there. Crack and heroin is causing more trouble than fascists. I would sooner live next door to a bnp member than a crack dealer. :rolleyes:
 
what about the "nice" bloke who runs the bnp seems a nice chap has'nt been convicted of anything yet :rolleyes:
 
likesfish said:
what about the "nice" bloke who runs the bnp seems a nice chap has'nt been convicted of anything yet :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

In 1998 he was convicted for distributing material likely to incite racial hatred.
 
did'nt realize that is there anyone in the BNP whose not crim?
always made me laugh there be that twat going on about the bnp were representing normal people.
while in the background were a load of skinheaded ugly thugs. if there the masterrace something has gone seriously wrong :D
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Kid_Eternity
Collective - new left wing party?
2 3 4 5 6
Replies
154
Views
6K
PR1Berske
PR1Berske
Kid_Eternity
“Left-wing anarchist guilty of terror offences”
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
brogdale
brogdale
tim
Were you recruited to the Left? Have you recruited people to the Left? Is it even possible to be "recruited" to the Left?
2 3
Replies
80
Views
4K
hitmouse
hitmouse
danny la rouge
Left conversion
2 3 4
Replies
118
Views
4K
PTK
PTK
N
Why do right-wing populists succeed?
2
Replies
45
Views
2K
nightowl
N
Back
Top Bottom