Rather more happens at borders than the administration of excise duties, of course.
But isn't customs the main reason people are arguing why a border is necesarry?
Rather more happens at borders than the administration of excise duties, of course.
But isn't customs the main reason people are arguing why a border is necesarry?
Noel Edmunds was called in for consultationThe House of Lords has released a report - is it an Impact Assessment? I dunno! - on Brexit and particularly a no-deal Brexit.
House of Lords - Brexit: deal or no deal - European Union Committee
Mr Blobby is already running the show.Noel Edmunds was called in for consultation
Yes, but customs generally includes export and import permits and licenses and certifications and all the rest of it. AFAIK HMRC just handles the excise bit of customs, and the inspection bit of customs is managed by what used to be UKBA.
Home Affairs SC heard evidence from four of the 20 or so agencies tied in to running a border, that its a bad idea - the more inland you bring nasties you want to keep out, be it plague carrying rats, rabid dogs, deadly spiders, plant diseases...the more likely they are to get a toeholdThe suggestion seemed to be that it could all be handled away from the border. Not sure about inspections though. Will have to look what ukba view is.
That only works if we stay in the Single Market, leave the single market and potentially diverge from its regulatory regime and the checks become much more stringentI think they're pretending when they say it's all about a few milk lorries to be honest.
I found this when I was talking to someone about the "Norway option" a while ago:
Is the Norway-Sweden border a model for UK-Ireland?
It's quite technical and includes a link to the HMG official position. The comments are interesting too.
Home Affairs SC heard evidence from four of the 20 or so agencies tied in to running a border, that its a bad idea - the more inland you bring nasties you want to keep out, be it plague carrying rats, rabid dogs, deadly spiders, plant diseases...the more likely they are to get a toehold
There was a BBC article about the technology some weeks back. The main upshot of it was that it requires close collaboration between either side to have any chance of working (so a good job HMG hasn’t pissed off any close neighbours recently then) irrespective of how fancy the tech is.I found this when I was talking to someone about the "Norway option" a while ago:
Is the Norway-Sweden border a model for UK-Ireland?
It's quite technical and includes a link to the HMG official position. The comments are interesting too.
That only works if we stay in the Single Market, leave the single market and potentially diverge from its regulatory regime and the checks become much more stringent
plenty of crinkley bottoms in the house of lords etc etcMr Blobby is already running the show.
It's no surprise you were so mistaken about the EFTA overtures when you mistake a blog for the spectator changing direction.The Spectator - that house organ of the insane, flag-waving, no-deal, Singapore-on-Thames, Rexit right - is now calling for a second referendum.
Nick Clegg is right: we need a second Brexit referendum | Coffee House
First and second preference votes for three options - accept the deal, revert to status quo ante, crash out - and AV to determine the winner.
Bring it on, I think remain could win that.
And it's interesting that some Brexitloons will be so angry about any settlement which looks like soft Brexit that they'd happily roll the dice again.
plenty of crinkley bottoms in the house of lords etc etc
HeDavid Davis told today’s Mail on Sunday: “HBOSBrexit had robbed me of my marriage, my family, my businesses, my long-standing friend and business partner; my income, my investments, my self-respect, my reputation, my privacy, my physical and mental health.
“It cost me my security, my image rights, my collection of classic cars – and very nearly my life.”
We're not.A couple of years back I worked for a Norwegian company. The manufacturing plant was in Norway which meant everything we sold into the UK market got delivered from Norway. Our stuff would frequently get held up at customs as it was being processed, this made our lead times longer than all of the competition and was one of the reasons we were not competitive. I would hope that we are not heading back to that.
I think there's a fair chance that could ne the outcome, through no more than 50-50. In any referendum it would be very easy for Brexiteers to portray the re-run as elites ignoring the people - pretty much what it would be. And for that reason alone, nobody in government or indeed Corbyn is/are going to seriously argue for a re-run.The Spectator - that house organ of the insane, flag-waving, no-deal, Singapore-on-Thames, Rexit right - is now calling for a second referendum.
Nick Clegg is right: we need a second Brexit referendum | Coffee House
First and second preference votes for three options - accept the deal, revert to status quo ante, crash out - and AV to determine the winner.
Bring it on, I think remain could win that.
And it's interesting that some Brexitloons will be so angry about any settlement which looks like soft Brexit that they'd happily roll the dice again.
Indeed. In some fairy godmother free wishes, Cher related scenario, May, Corbyn and plenty of others would wish they could turn back time to a more innocent era where the ideologically anti-EU lot just huffed and puffed in the golf club. Opening it up to a referendum, which allowed everybody else the opportunity to vent their anxieties and contempt for the whole shooting match is a genie that doesn't go back in the bottle. It's not a Lexit genie because there never was a Lexit, but the sentiments expressed were real.Can't see there being a second referendum under this govt tbh and Labour would be barmy to call for one.
Good luck in translating that into a snappy ballot paper question.Agreed. The maths is one of putting together diehard rebellious Brexiteers with diehard rebellious Remainers in the HoC. That still doesn't beat the craven pragmatists.
That said, though, lexiteers of Urban, how would you vote in those circumstances? Assume that the deal is - essentially - EEA + CU for an extendable, open-ended transition period with a view to Canada-style agreement in the future.
Good luck in translating that into a snappy ballot paper question.
That's the beef I have with the universe. Falange has got 'look at me, I won brexit' at the heart of his self image. A smug cunt doing the chat shows, raking it in till the end of recorded time. Instead, every single fucking day of his miserable life should be made up of paper cuts, stones in shoes, burnt toast and stubbed toes. C'mon karma, you lazy bastard, do your fucking stuff!Nigel Farage - no more politics for me, except the pension of course
...
As a (semi-detached) member of the Lexit oddster community you'll be hearing from my solicitor. Or twitter.I guess that by then it will just be called "the deal", I'm only defining it in advance of reality so that the Lexit oddsters can answer the question.
Flurry of paper cuts requiring a blended blood donation from all of the 27.Maybe the FBI will karma him?
That's the beef I have with the universe. Falange has got 'look at me, I won brexit' at the heart of his self image. A smug cunt doing the chat shows, raking it in till the end of recorded time. Instead, every single fucking day of his miserable life should be made up of paper cuts, stones in shoes, burnt toast and stubbed toes. C'mon karma, you lazy bastard, do your fucking stuff!