belboid
Exasperated, not angry.
Yes, there's been 'a' Britain for a thousand years. It's just had rather different borders, nations, definitions. Oh, and relations with Europe.I think you mean -' the UK as it exists now'.
Yes, there's been 'a' Britain for a thousand years. It's just had rather different borders, nations, definitions. Oh, and relations with Europe.I think you mean -' the UK as it exists now'.
The point is still the same though, in appealing toI think you mean -' the UK as it exists now'.
Watson is simultaneously showing a terrible grasp of history and pandering to a cosy idea of shared tradition which has never really existedthe same Britain at heart that we’ve been for 1000 years
Yes, there's been 'a' Britain for a thousand years. It's just had rather different borders, nations, definitions. Oh, and relations with Europe.
All superstructure, no base. Trade deal with US blah blah blah.
I'm not dreaming. I didn't say it was being channelled in a positive direction. I'm just saying that you won't be able to channel that anger towards support for Remain and that you are actively aiding and abetting the development of the far right by ignoring this.
E2A: It's not just the UK by the way - it's everywhere, and I'm tired of Little Englander remainers ignoring this.
You are saying nothing of any consequence. If you think trade deals with the US and the capital flow that will ensue are unimportant it’s hard to see what your objection is to the EU. You’ve got on board a bun fight that is entirely on the terms of the right and you don’t have a reason why.
Massive threat to them, this left on left on progressive slagging.
Strictly speaking there was a Britain between 410 and just after Gildas' time, then no Britain until 1284 whereupon we have had varying forms of Britain (with the most accurate Britain starting in 1485) since.
England I think you mean, being as the most accurate Britain you suggest omitted scotlandStrictly speaking there was a Britain between 410 and just after Gildas' time, then no Britain until 1284 whereupon we have had varying forms of Britain (with the most accurate Britain starting in 1485) since.
You know that no one outside of Gb/europe gives a toss right?
England I think you mean, being as the most accurate Britain you suggest omitted scotland
Surely (almost) everyone on this island was British by virtue of er born and bred on the islandNot really - Britain has to include all of the British, which England didn't until Edward I's conquest. I am not sure the Scots have ever been British, or at least those north of the northernmost wall weren't (hence the linguistic differences).
Surely (almost) everyone on this island was British by virtue of er born and bred on the island
but we're not talking about being 'British' but about the existence of 'Britain.' And there's been one of them for a couple of millennia. It's just got a really vague meaning, as I think this last page or so demonstrates.That is a modern definition of "British" though - the English didn't consider themselves as British until relatively recently (and indeed many still don't).
Mate you're desperately defending the staus quo and fuelling the growth of the far right, how are you progressive or left?
I didn't say I thought trade deals with the US were unimportant. I'm just saying things that might happen aren't quite as important as things that are happening right in front of you, right now.
Surely (almost) everyone on this island was British by virtue of er born and bred on the island
Isn't where somebody is born an accident of birth?
I suppose somebody can be geographically from the British isles...but it ends there and has no more significance than if a person is Geographically from a place called China.
Any other definition is about family and choice. I am born in Kent but owe nothing to others born there too because they happen to introduce the concept of nationality.
I'm sure you think your making an incisive point, that people won't have considered this before. You're not.Isn't where somebody is born an accident of birth?
I suppose somebody can be geographically from the British isles...but it ends there and has no more significance than if a person is Geographically from a place called China.
Any other definition is about family and choice. I am born in Kent but owe nothing to others born there too because they happen to introduce the concept of nationality.
If you knew then you really should have mentioned this border thing before, why has it taken 936 pages for this issue to be raised?Brexit in terms of the word 'leave' only happens with a hard 'border' on the island of Ireland.
No, that one really is a personal failing for which only the boring person can be blamed.I think being a boring cunt is probably an accident of birth as well, so you'll just have to buckle up and cope with it.
I think being a boring cunt is probably an accident of birth as well, so you'll just have to buckle up and cope with it.[/QUOTE
You choose to be personally abusive. OK.
You are simply a plain cunt without even the extra quality you attribute to me.
Fair enough. Although your certainly as to what I think is quite wrong, but if nationality has been mentioned before I take your point, after all every individual poster here is never repetitive, and always original...not.I'm sure you think your making an incisive point, that people won't have considered this before. You're not.
It has been raised before. As has the 'boring' stuff about 'lexit'.If you knew then you really should have mentioned this border thing before, why has it taken 936 pages for this issue to be raised?
I am not surprised you argue that being boring is not an additional quality.philosophical - Boring isn't an additional quality.
The ability to use the quote function might be though....
'Has' it 'really'? Well I 'never'It has been raised before. As has the 'boring' stuff about 'lexit'.
If I say you're definitely right about whatever it is you're on about and everyone else is wrong will you stop posting for a bit?I am not surprised you argue that being boring is not an additional quality.
I argue that it is an additional quality to enhance my cuntishness.
You are left with cuntishness alone, and might be jealous.
After all, it was your choice to respond abusively.
Are you some kind of censor?If I say you're definitely right about whatever it is you're on about and everyone else is wrong will you stop posting for a bit?