Mr Moose
What the hell are we supposed to tell the kids?
Me? I was a special needs teacher. Off long term sick and shortly to be looking for something else.
Hope you find it.
Me? I was a special needs teacher. Off long term sick and shortly to be looking for something else.
he rants on the internet
Who said anything about what people believe about themselves?I’m a care worker. What about you?
I’m not trying to be holier than thou about city types. I’m just chatting. But what they believe about themselves isn’t especially important for how the thing works.
We wouldn't want the collapse of the US or RED CHINA or anything. Another words for collapse is change to establish for the workers by hand or by brain the full fruits of their industry and the most equitable distribution thereof that may be possible upon the basis of the common ownership of the means of production, distribution and exchange, and the best obtainable system of popular administration and control of each industry or service.
But i've just remembered that you're of those anti-corbynites i've heard about.
Yes, the very idea of changing things from this shitness is a bit mad.Thanks. I have been missing the rigour of student politics.
Who said anything about what people believe about themselves?
Is it impossible for care workers to be believers in capitalism? If so, how? If not, why not?
Yes, the very idea of changing things from this shitness is a bit mad.
You're the extremist nutter shouting defend the US, defend the USSR, defend, the EU, defend Red China, change nothing btw. An inverted coin of student idiot from your memory saying er...defend the USSR, change nothing.Thanks. I have been missing the rigour of student politics.
You must be middle class then.Yes I would like it to say exactly the same, well done.
My point — made over a number of posts in aggregate, not just that one in isolation — was that the reasons for attitudes even in the City are more complex than simply a monolithic view of “whatever gives the largest profit is what we want to happen”.What exactly was your point (other than displaying the width of your network) and what was it you think I was saying?
You're the extremist nutter shouting defend the US, defend the USSR, defend, the EU, defend Red China, change nothing btw. An inverted coin of student idiot from your memory saying er...defend the USSR, change nothing.
You must be middle class then.
Do you really never follow your own logic? Keep track of what you post?
I’m studying psychology and eventually hope to go into something in mental health services. When I do, I will be allowed to have different views on politics and its shadow, but until that time I’m only allowed to believe that capitalism is good.
What is this nonsense?
There's a point here that marxists often make about politics being the legimating function for total capital to carry on - sometimes against individual capitals or sectors of capital. That is in the glorious process of breaking down. That might be a bit studenty though. The idea that society is just rich people trying to stay rich is much more complex and nuanced.My point — made over a number of posts in aggregate, not just that one in isolation — was that the reasons for attitudes even in the City are more complex than simply a monolithic view of “whatever gives the largest profit is what we want to happen”.
William of Walworth said:If a second ref ever happens, their thing (in a token way anyway) will be to "reform the EU from within". Any actual strategist or half way good pollster on the Remain side would have to have the sense, after last time, to want to come over as a 'critical friend' or whatever, rather than just worshippers.
Surely you're not forgetting Cameron's "deal"?
My point — made over a number of posts in aggregate, not just that one in isolation — was that the reasons for attitudes even in the City are more complex than simply a monolithic view of “whatever gives the largest profit is what we want to happen”.
William oif Walworth said:Don't expect anything much.. No-one really wants to reform the EU, but they might? dream up some half-convincing way of pretending to, in a campaign. And would have to, to have much chance, IMO.
They won't because, to be honest, they don't need to. They can't either
You disagree that the City is formed of multiple perspectives that aren’t all formed around pure profit motive? What is it, a monothought clique?And my point is that’s ultimately a bit of a delusion and a nice one for the best off (plenty of others I know) to afford.
Well, your responses and questions had nothing to do with anything I’d asserted, so that’s just how it goes.Maybe you know what this means, but it’s not an answer to the question I asked you.
I think that's stupidly complacent if they don't come up with any better strategy than that.
What if they have no other perspective than that though? Surely if there was it would have come through in some way over the last few years? It hasn't though has it?Agreeing with "can't" I think. They may well try, but not succeed.
But would they really be so complacent as to just rely on bigger young-voter turnout and all that? Kellner's argued at YouGov that remain could well win just because of differential turnout, and without a single former leave voter switching to remain.
I think that's stupidly complacent if they don't come up with any better strategy than that.
What is it, a monothought clique?
You disagree that the City is formed of multiple perspectives that aren’t all formed around pure profit motive? What is it, a monothought clique?
Shut it gammon.What's all this white awakening shite about?