BemusedbyLife
Well-Known Member
It owes the banks, the IMF and the ECB has a consequence of an EU brokered deal, the EU has massive clout in this situation.Greece doesn't owe the EU any money.
It owes the banks, the IMF and the ECB has a consequence of an EU brokered deal, the EU has massive clout in this situation.Greece doesn't owe the EU any money.
They may very well have no choice eventually but I would imagine that they're reluctant to do it up front while Greece is still a bottomless pit.They can, and should, write off the money. They'll have to eventually.
Do you continue to support a club that bullies one of its members? (And has it pretty much written into its constitution that it will keep doing so.) Or do you leave?How does brexit help Greece?
It owes the banks, the IMF and the ECB has a consequence of an EU brokered deal, the EU has massive clout in this situation.
In order of importance I would say the Council and the Commission have the most clout with the Parliament having very little (pity really since its the one I feel would be most sympathetic to a fairer solution)Which EU institution do you suggest has the clout?
That's pretty abstract. I don't particularly see how it has a real-world effect to negate effect on Greece of taking away the UK contribution to the pot. The UK govt has played a full role in that kind of abuse in recent years, abusing its own people in the name of bailing out banks. Didn't even need to be forced to do it by the EU. The problem with lexit arguments is that lexit isn't happening.Do you continue to support a club that bullies one of its members? (And has it pretty much written into its constitution that it will keep doing so.) Or do you leave?
At least by leaving you withdraw support for the abuse, and maybe you undermine the club a bit.
By staying and not immediately and incessantly demanding an end to the abuse, and taking actions to back up those demands, you are endorsing it.
tbf, since the brexit vote, the EU appears to be trying to show its humane side with Greece (or at least taken its foot off the sadistic/ humiliation pedal for now).not really - Greece would continue to be subject to the EU's whims regardless of whether the UK was or was not a member, so voting one way or t'other has absolutely no impact whatsoever on Greece.
In order of importance I would say the Council and the Commission have the most clout with the Parliament having very little (pity really since its the one I feel would be most sympathetic to a fairer solution)
The Council tends to distorted by its members putting national interests first and the Commission is dominated by too many technocrats like Junkers and his mates, I would like to see it elected directly myself.
Let's be clear - the argument to Leave wasn't that it would directly or immediately help Greece, it was that the EU is the sort of place where things like that happen to countries like Greece. And we were asked whether we wanted to be a part of that. Your answer is that we should.That's pretty abstract. I don't particularly see how it has a real-world effect to negate effect on Greece of taking away the UK contribution to the pot. The UK govt has played a full role in that kind of abuse in recent years, abusing its own people in the name of bailing out banks. Didn't even need to be forced to do it by the EU. The problem with lexit arguments is that lexit isn't happening.
Vote Remain.And you think they have that clout over the EFSF? I'd say that they really are just observers. When the Eurozone finance ministers and their treasury officials are gathered together, there's nothing that really trumps them, supranationally speaking.
Do you continue to support a club that bullies one of its members? (And has it pretty much written into its constitution that it will keep doing so.) Or do you leave?
At least by leaving you withdraw support for the abuse, and maybe you undermine the club a bit.
By staying and not immediately and incessantly demanding an end to the abuse, and taking actions to back up those demands, you are endorsing it.
Yes you're undoubtably right, in fact you have just demolished the 2nd biggest pro-brexit argument (it's taking power away from Westminster), the finance ministers of the member states are the people with the power not the unelected commissioners.And you think they have that clout over the EFSF? I'd say that they really are just observers. When the Eurozone finance ministers and their treasury officials are gathered together, there's nothing that really trumps them, supranationally speaking.
I'm willing to bet that very few people who cast a vote in the Referendum either Leave or Remain were concerned with the effect that vote would have on GreeceLet's be clear - the argument to Leave wasn't that it would directly or immediately help Greece, it was that the EU is the sort of place where things like that happen to countries like Greece. And we were asked whether we wanted to be a part of that. Your answer is that we should.
this is why the greece situation has remain voters on a cleft stick. Either you are happy with technocrats and bankers effectively running the wider polity (silas is, with no feelings of shame) or you have the LBJ position which doesn't want to admit that the remain position is basically holding the bullies coatVote Remain.
Mine pretty much is.Is your position that there is no mechanism for reform from within the EU that can be influenced by its citizens?
Santino'' post: 15346572 said:...By staying and not immediately and incessantly demanding an end to the abuse, and taking actions to back up those demands, you are endorsing it.
Is your position that there is?Is your position that there is no mechanism for reform from within the EU that can be influenced by its citizens?
I also considered what Nick Clegg would have done, and then did the opposite.thats fine if Greece is the only iron in the fire, but its not - well, it might be if you're Citizen Smith from the Free Tooting Collective - but for the rest of us its a plate spinning act of Greece, the GFA and associated Irish issues, concern/fear over the path UK politics might take post-Brexit, the economy/trade, concern over what deals might be struck by a post-Brexit government desperate for non-EU trade agreements, and the lexit argument that the EU rules and structures tie us into spiv capitalism.
all of those carry weight, all of those have both upsides and downsides, and all have uncertainties.
if you only considered one of them, and gave no thought to either the others, then you're probably an idiot.
thats fine if Greece is the only iron in the fire, but its not - well, it might be if you're Citizen Smith from the Free Tooting Collective - but for the rest of us its a plate spinning act of Greece, the GFA and associated Irish issues, concern/fear over the path UK politics might take post-Brexit, the economy/trade, concern over what deals might be struck by a post-Brexit government desperate for non-EU trade agreements, and the lexit argument that the EU rules and structures tie us into spiv capitalism.
all of those carry weight, all of those have both upsides and downsides, and all have uncertainties.
if you only considered one of them, and gave no thought to either the others, then you're probably an idiot.
Yes.Is your position that there is?
I also considered what Nick Clegg would have done, and then did the opposite.
How did he vote?did you do the same regarding Jeremy Clarkson?
How did he vote?
I'm not aware of any mechanism that offers any practical hope in the short or even medium term, but perhaps you are privy to some information that would challenge this.Yes.
Now your answer?
Well, what public pronouncements did he make? Perhaps we can make a cautious inference from those.no idea, i wasn't in the booth with him.
AS YOU probably know, I was very keen that Britain should remain in the EU and very worried when I woke on that fateful Friday morning to find that we had voted to leave.
Your strategy seems to rely on all countries eventually leaving the EU, or at least, enough countries leaving the EU that its in your opinion undemocratic leadership changes its ways so as to protect itself from complete dissolution. To me, that strategy doesn't seem to offer any practical hope in the short or medium term.I'm not aware of any mechanism that offers any practical hope in the short or even medium term, but perhaps you are privy to some information that would challenge this.