Not somebody you want advising you on how to treat your cancer, then.She's an expert in the quackery that is homeopathy.
Not somebody you want advising you on how to treat your cancer, then.She's an expert in the quackery that is homeopathy.
' In October 2001,Davis took over from Peter Jay as the BBC's economics editor. He left this post in April 2008 to become a presenter on BBC Radio 4's Today programme'He's not actually an economist, is he?
Not somebody you want advising you on how to treat your cancer, then.
In October 2001,Davis took over from Peter Jay as the BBC's economics editor. He left this post in April 2008 to become a presenter on BBC Radio 4's Today programme
See also: religion.Is she an expert? Or just a quack that thinks she is an expert?
You’re on shaky ground!We have seismologists that understand plate tectonics incredibly well, but if one predicted where an earthquake is going to be next year, you'd tell him to get to fuck. (Warning: my understanding of seismology is very limited and this analogy may not actually work).
Economics isn't a proper science like physics or biology, it's more like pyschology a sort of quasi-science much of which is opinion but there are some hard facts in there though, the concept of supply and demand has pretty much proven itself unassailable, homeopathy is like religion just sheer drivel.economists are invested with a more shamanic power than homeopaths. Everyone knows homeopaths are full of it but you put that dragons den presenter on bbc news and he is A Voice of Authority
Economics isn't a proper science like physics or biology, it's more like pyschology a sort of quasi-science much of which is opinion but there are some hard facts in there though, the concept of supply and demand has pretty much proven itself unassailable, homeopathy is like religion just sheer drivel.
This isn't a special status for NI, its an acceptance that the UK as a whole will be in regulatory alignment with the EU. It can work no other way.
concur. Which is even more government by fax than EFTA is supposed to be but I suppose 'immigrants!' makes it alright to someThis isn't a special status for NI, its an acceptance that the UK as a whole will be in regulatory alignment with the EU. It can work no other way.
Psychology is fundamentally driven by an attempt to deal scientifically with problems that are difficult to deal with scientifically. Experiments are performed all the time, involving hypotheses, controls and statistical evaluation of the outcomes. Qualitative analytical methods have been developed to try to apply some rigour to richer data sources. The result is something that makes testable predictions and adapts according to whether or not those predictions are accurate. To put it in the same bracket as economics is highly insulting.Economics isn't a proper science like physics or biology, it's more like pyschology a sort of quasi-science much of which is opinion but there are some hard facts in there though, the concept of supply and demand has pretty much proven itself unassailable, homeopathy is like religion just sheer drivel.
You'd have thought so. But Arlene presumably has been briefed otherwise. She can't just be cavilling because she's such an ardent Brexiteer.
London staying in the EU and the rest of England being out is barmy by any standards, London already gets more than its fair share of investment how much worse would it get under those circumstances? We might as well just bulldoze everything north of Milton Keynes flat and just forget it exists.
Psychology may be full of unrepeatable findings, but at least they are in principle things that can be proven or disproven. Economic theories seem to be immune to evidence.Psychology is fundamentally driven by an attempt to deal scientifically with problems that are difficult to deal with scientifically. Experiments are performed all the time, involving hypotheses, controls and statistical evaluation of the outcomes. Qualitative analytical methods have been developed to try to apply some rigour to richer data sources. The result is something that makes testable predictions and adapts according to whether or not those predictions are accurate. To put it in the same bracket as economics is highly insulting.
Psychology may be full of unrepeatable findings, but at least they are in principle things that can be proven or disproven. Economic theories seem to be immune to evidence.
cavilling: making petty or unnecessary objections. why do you think her objections petty or unnecessary?You'd have thought so. But Arlene presumably has been briefed otherwise. She can't just be cavilling because she's such an ardent Brexiteer.
I know its Denis MacShane, but if he is right that this is the text then we are staying in the Single Market: