two sheds
Least noticed poster 2007
The right wingers are less deluded, tbf.
fewer
The right wingers are less deluded, tbf.
I'm not sure who I find more contemptible; right wing "they come over here, taking our jobs" dickheads, or smug lexit pricks who insist that they've got it right, the rest of us are stupid, and come out with shit like this ^^^
Only if you do us a picture of former lucasian professor Stephen hawking done in ms paintI can work MS Paint and state the bleeding obvious too, can I have an Oxbridge professorship please?
I just really want to know why, when asked for a positive example of progressive social change
That was nothing to do with Brexit or Lexit, I just really want to know why, when asked for a positive example of progressive social change, someone would suggest the General Data Protection Regulation. That to me is quite an interesting response. Do you not find anything odd about that?
I'm not convinced. i am fairly sure that (pre AOC equality) that 'under age' gay men (over 16) could also be prosecuted (and were) - one of the gay men convicted in the 'operation spanner' case was (at the time of the 'offence' 17 and was not considered a 'victim' by the law.
Spanner was a different kettle of fish. It was about whether or not certain sado-masochistic acts could be considered consensual, as opposed to the perpetration of bodily harm.
This happens on less fewer occasions than I'd like tbh.I hate people saying "less" when they should say "fewer" so I correct them whenever I have chance, whether they need it or not.
I'm fewer than impressed, to be honest.I hate people saying "less" when they should say "fewer" so I correct them whenever I have chance, whether they need it or not.
Yeh being as impressed is a trioI'm fewer than impressed, to be honest.
I'm fewer than impressed, to be honest.
GDPR wouldn't have happened by a single government in isolation.
I can't find detail now (and it's a bit of a tangent from this thread) but I was led to believe when I was 18-ish that if I and (over 21) partner did get caught, we'd both be in the dock. And have a recollection that one of the arguments in the equalising AoC debate was that gay men under 21 were put off reporting sexual assault / rape because they risked prosecution if the case wasn't proved.
The 1967 partial decriminalisation happened before the UK joined the EEC of course
I pointed you towards the UKs own AMR initiative that predates the EU's by over a decade and was it's key influence (as well as the WHOs).
Strewth, you said ' if you think there is anything progressive about the EU you are either a moron or the enemy or both.'
No mention of socially progressive. Honestly you really shouldn't throw the word moron around so readily.
Socially progressive. What is this exactly?
I think that line about GDPR is ripe for a placard though. Surrounded by a circle of stars.
It's the strategy and action plan that was later adopted by the EU (together with the WHO).You pointed me towards a 'strategy and action plan' document from nearly twenty years ago. My question was about actual implemented policy. Has the UK been implementing policy on AMR in agriculture ahead of what is being done by the EU as a whole? Have other countries? Your implication was that we shouldn't be worrying about chlorinated chicken because of the EU's failure to do anything about AMR. So, is the EU ahead or behind of other parts of the world in terms of actually implementing meaningful policy?
I hate people saying "less" when they should say "fewer" so I correct them whenever I have chance, whether they need it or not.
Corbyn showing another lack of leadership by claiming less than £6,000
fewer or less?
Use less when you’re referring to something that can’t be counted or doesn’t have a plural
£6000 can't be counted so "less" is clearly correct