Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Is Brexit actually going to happen?

Will we have a brexit?


  • Total voters
    362
So, cabinet meets at 2.00, conscription introduced by 5.00. I'm 57 and have a bad back, so I hope I'll miss it. If not I'll pretend I'm in a reserved occupation, like webdesigner or wellness guru.
perhaps each cabinet member could be given a pistol with one bullet in it, and a glass of whisky

corbyn and co can clean up the bodies when they move in this evening
 
I hear the EU wants an army now. As one wag put it 'nothing makes me more confident about europe than german re-armament'
So, cabinet meets at 2.00, conscription introduced by 5.00. I'm 57 and have a bad back, so I hope I'll miss it. If not I'll pretend I'm in a reserved occupation, like webdesigner or wellness guru.
I get a sweet gig in psyops and command of my own troll farm. All the pringles I can eat.
 
I hear the EU wants an army now. As one wag put it 'nothing makes me more confident about europe than german re-armament'

I get a sweet gig in psyops and command of my own troll farm. All the pringles I can eat.
'Wilson! Where's Private Walker?
- He was delayed at the Fake News factory Sir.
 
Loved all that "Vassal state" stuff from Johnson & the swivel-eyed fraternity yesterday...like giving a lesson in how to present the notion that the 'shared sovereignty' in the supra-state amounts to...er...some sovereignty...and now there'll be none.

#takebackcontrol
 
Loved all that "Vassal state" stuff from Johnson & the swivel-eyed fraternity yesterday...like giving a lesson in how to present the notion that the 'shared sovereignty' in the supra-state amounts to...er...some sovereignty...and now there'll be none.

#takebackcontrol

I was thinking that - positioning himself for a subtle Damascene conversion?
 
JRM and Alistair Campbell suddenly very buddy buddy over this "vassalage" question which is the tack Jo Johnson has taken to - could we yet see unity between Brexiteers and Remoaners as they discover what they really care about is getting rid of May without Corbyn coming to power?
 
As a remainer I thought it was a good thing for that side that parliament would have the final say. As what May is apparently going to put to parliament is more or less remain I feel now I was wrong as she’s probably going to be defeated.
 
As a remainer I thought it was a good thing for that side that parliament would have the final say. As what May is apparently going to put to parliament is more or less remain I feel now I was wrong as she’s probably going to be defeated.
It's not really more of less remain is it
 
This is interesting

The leaders of the four main opposition parties in Westminster – Jeremy Corbyn for Labour, Vince Cable for the Lib Dems, Ian Blackford for the SNP and Liz Saville Roberts for Plaid Cymru – have written to the prime minister demanding a “truly meaningful vote”. Here’s the full text of their letter:

We are writing to you with regard to an issue of the utmost importance: That is to ensure that Parliament has a truly meaningful vote on any Brexit withdrawal agreement.


Recent interventions from government ministers have suggested that you and your government may seek to limit or constrain the process on the final vote, in an attempt to muzzle Parliament. We want to be clear that this would be wholly unacceptable.

In particular, paragraph six of the government’s memorandum on the issue stated that: “Amendments could have the effect – whether deliberately or accidentally – of inhibiting the government’s legal ability to ratify the withdrawal agreement”.

We believe that Parliament should be able to consider, debate and vote on amendments before a decisive vote on the substantive motion. That would give this sovereign parliament an opportunity to express its view over the terms of departure from the EU. It is unthinkable that Parliament could be silenced at such a crucial period for the country.

We recognise that it will be necessary for a business motion to be agreed by the House to govern arrangements for consideration of this motion. But the existing procedures, which include limiting debate to 90 minutes, are not appropriate. So a much more extensive business motion will be needed for this crucial issue.

As a minimum, any motion to this House must include the possibility for multiple amendments to be tabled, with the Speaker able to select multiple amendments to be taken before the main motion. While we recognise Parliament will have to approve or disapprove any agreement, it would be reckless to present this vote as take-it-or-leave-it without Parliament being able to suggest an alternative.

We, as party leaders, have championed parliamentary scrutiny and engagement throughout this process and, throughout the debate, we have had repeated assurances from across the dispatch box that MPs would be able to express their support for alternative options. Now, it seems the government has abandoned its willingness to let Parliament take back control and seems determined to limit the role of this sovereign parliament.

We believe Parliament must be allowed to express its view and hold the executive to account. This would not be possible if Parliament was unable to table, debate and consider amendments before any decision on the substantive motion.

Sounds like they're a bit nervous about just how meaningful their "meaningful" vote is.

---

I know we don't know the full details but its hard to see how this deal (what we know if it) would be much different from a Labour brokered deal...I expect it passes Labours 6 tests too (though some of those tests are pretty vague..."Does it deliver for all regions and nations of the UK?"). Any thoughts on that?

Those 6 tests

Does it ensure a strong and collaborative future relationship with the EU?
Does it deliver the “exact same benefits” as we currently have as members of the Single Market and Customs Union? Does it ensure the fair management of migration in the interests of the economy and communities?
Does it defend rights and protections and prevent a race to the bottom?
Does it protect national security and our capacity to tackle cross-border crime?
Does it deliver for all regions and nations of the UK?

Also talking of front pages notable that the Express seem to back the deal - no BRETRAYAL!!! headline there....will be interesting to see who else falls in behind May from the harder brexit camp.
2018-11-14.jpg

Labour MP's that will vote with the government:

frank fields
jess philips


more?
yes :hmm:
eventually...

i reckon this is going to pass :hmm:
eventually...
 
Judging by Kate Hoey's question in PMQ's she can envisage some kind of sanctions in place to prevent Republic of Ireland fishing fleets in the waters for six miles around the UK coast in Northern Ireland.
I wonder if she has any idea how such a thing might happen in practice.
 
Signs of Remainiac Tories moving in May's direction.
Tory remainers 'getting cold feet' about Brexit deal rebellion

This reporting is all fluff at the moment, but my hunch is that today is the big hurdle. If she gets cabinet support the drift is likely to be in her direction afterwards. There's a logic that the more the deal looks like a customs union, the more it alienates the swivellers, but I suspect attrition and the logic of ultimately being a political party will take over.

Same time, she really is making a fist of fucking the whole thing up. :thumbs:
 
Back
Top Bottom