Who dares whines.
A poor second to raheem.Who dares whines.
(nicked from Twitter)
This all leaves rees-mogg unambiguously leading the swivel eyed presumably? Johnson and govething are tainted by actually agreeing the cabinet stance and davis left it too late to play this card.
it does, but Johnson has shot his own fox by his performance as FS and his general attitude in Cabinet - he was never that popular amongst the PCP anyway, but he's probably down to the low 20's of supporters by now. Rees-Mogg is also not nearly as popular amongst the PCP as he'd have you believe, and the more scutiny his financial affairs have had have lessened the willingness of people to take a punt on him - he looks like a scandal waiting to happen, and the backlass against Johnson has also washed over him - the 'great on HIGNFY' thing has been somewhat devalued by Johnson, and it is a large part of the Moggs act...
Sajid Javid, Gavin Williamson, Gove (still), and doubtless people i've never heard of. but not yet....
Whilst I don't want to take away from the joy that is all these resignations, in the back of my mind this does seem like it will boil down to a leadership battle, and the hardcore brexiteers will suddenly get all shirty. A soft brexit was something I could possibly deal with, but now all these baboon's clearly want to try and stop that. Mail etc will no doubt get behind them as well meaning the majority of the can't think for themselves public will too.
There's some naive, trusting part of me that thinks maybe all this bullshit is a cunning game of brinkmanship, let the EU see how close we'll go to a no-deal brexit, through sheer bickering, and give us more than they otherwise might have because otherwise it's too late.
exactly why the 'no deal is better than a bad deal' thing is obvious bullshit, and hasn't worked.I’m not sure that putting a gun to your head and say “I’ll pull the trigger unless you give me what I want” is that strong a tactic ?
Alex
I’m not sure that putting a gun to your head and say “I’ll pull the trigger unless you give me what I want” is that strong a tactic ?
Alex
Not with this government, as the gun isn't loaded and is a banana anyway.
I thought they were running Syria?
If the UK government only wants free trade for non-services goods, what does that mean for the Irish border problem?
If the UK government only wants free trade for non-services goods, what does that mean for the Irish border problem?
How do you know what people thought in the polling booth?The results of the Brexit referendum cannot be taken literally as a democratic will of the people of the nation. It is not even legally binding. 48 per cent voted to remain, not necessarily because they all are happy with the status quo and the evolving trend of the EU regime. Because there was no choice in the referendum other than to remain or leave. The leave voters wanted UK out of Brussel’s bureaucratic clutches, incited by propaganda like, UK pays EU £350 million a week. This is obviously a well-known disingenuous fact. The truth is the UK receives about half of that money in return from EU as grants and subsidies. Funding the NHS from the money saved from BREXIT is another fallacy. The leave vote was largely a populist vote without any verification of assumptions, facts and figures. However, the ever-growing bureaucratic rules and regulations the EU is imposing on UK, and its political consolidation, are common issues of momentum for leaving EU. The populist leave voters neither considered nor were informed of the implications of Brexit on the UK industry, business, trade, financial and banking services, and cross-border issues like in Northern Ireland, now transpired after the referendum. Result of a referendum incited by fake information and ignorance should not be deemed as immutable outcome precluding mitigating adjustments.
The results of the Brexit referendum cannot be taken literally as a democratic will of the people of the nation. It is not even legally binding. 48 per cent voted to remain, not necessarily because they all are happy with the status quo and the evolving trend of the EU regime. Because there was no choice in the referendum other than to remain or leave. The leave voters wanted UK out of Brussel’s bureaucratic clutches, incited by propaganda like, UK pays EU £350 million a week. This is obviously a well-known disingenuous fact. The truth is the UK receives about half of that money in return from EU as grants and subsidies. Funding the NHS from the money saved from BREXIT is another fallacy. The leave vote was largely a populist vote without any verification of assumptions, facts and figures. However, the ever-growing bureaucratic rules and regulations the EU is imposing on UK, and its political consolidation, are common issues of momentum for leaving EU. The populist leave voters neither considered nor were informed of the implications of Brexit on the UK industry, business, trade, financial and banking services, and cross-border issues like in Northern Ireland, now transpired after the referendum. Result of a referendum incited by fake information and ignorance should not be deemed as immutable outcome precluding mitigating adjustments.
And what's worse that post isn't even interestingtl;dr referendum should be ignored because I don't like the result