It's supposed to mean 'fuck off'. HTH.I have not posted here every day. So when you say 'for once' what is that supposed to mean?
It's supposed to mean 'fuck off'. HTH.I have not posted here every day. So when you say 'for once' what is that supposed to mean?
Ah. Santino is billbond's interpreter. Must be a nuance of groupthink and no platforming. How fashionably left wing that appears to be.
Ah. Santino is billbond's interpreter. Must be a nuance of groupthink and no platforming. How fashionably left wing that appears to be.
I am not claiming that, I am observing how when I make a perfectly reasonable contribution today we have the playing the man instead of the ball scenario when the response from some here is to (apparently) tell me to fuck off. In a way it is a form of no platforming, when simply ignoring me would be sufficient, and the groupthink happens when people join in to gain favour from the fucker offers.With 456 posts on this thread you can't really claim to be being no-platformed, tbf.
Need?
Bollocks. Vacuous bollocks. Surprised even you would come out with guff like that.Ah. Santino is billbond's interpreter. Must be a nuance of groupthink and no platforming. How fashionably left wing that appears to be.
Another bore , a cunt-collective, one could say.It's classic groupthink. From a collective of people who voted for Brexit in order to cause civil war in Ireland, a cunt-collective, one could say.
Tbh not keen on chatting to NazisI have not posted here every day. So when you say 'for once' what is that supposed to mean?
I would stick to making placards and lighting candles mate, more your type of thingYou need to take this cunt-collective and throw a few fucks in to them, that’d make them think twice.
Tbh not keen on chatting to Nazis
That for me is what anti Democrats are, understand that old boy
Anyway off for a toot and a rum, life can be so good at times
Happy days
Your version of democracy is probably a version of National Socialism, you know the type, marginalize, criticize and attack.Tbh not keen on chatting to Nazis
That for me is what anti Democrats are, understand that old boy
Anyway off for a toot and a rum, life can be so good at times
Happy days
Your version of democracy is probably a version of National Socialism, you know the type, marginalize, criticize and attack.
There is a panoply of versions of democracy and your National Socialist one has already been tried with disastrous results.
If he calls me a Nazi to start off with then a response is to be expected.No, he's not a Nazi either. Fuck's sake, get some perspective - a prosperous Western democracy has narrowly voted against being part of a union with neighboring wealthy countries and slightly poorer ones to the south and east. There are likely to be some issues regarding tariffs, residency requirements, and border enforcement.
The outcome might be something that slightly favours those who want a clean break from the EU, or something that slightly favours those who want to stay in. There aren't going to be piles of millions of dead bodies either way, not unless everybody reading about the negotiations suddenly dies of boredom.
and there was me all ready to do my Herr Flick impressionCan we keep the Nazi name calling off this thread, it's fucking ridiculous & childish.
Explain how this and these works please. It's obviously very important and exactly as you say. And that the EU doesn't facilitate job-robbery such as you suggest at all - isn't, in fact, a vehicle for doing so. Explain that too please.32 UK companies have registered in France since January this year. Around 12000 jobs so far.
This is why I post here trying to challenge brexiters to come up with a workable solution for what they voted for.
And if they do, what should they do with the plans after receiving approval from yourself? A polite letter to Theresa May? People's Brexit March to Strasbourg via Brussels? Full page ad in the Guardian? Where do you see things going, after you get what you want? Because obviously you're posting in good faith, right?
If brexiters come up with what they think is a workable solution their next step is to implement it and find out how workable it is.
I have my doubts that they can do that.
If they can't, one implication is that brexit collapses into chaos and doesn't happen at all. It won't need second votes or agreements or deals, the chaos will be manifest.
Do I need to assert that I lost in good faith? Is that the rule for everybody here?
Do I need to assert that I post in good faith? Is that the rule for everybody here?
I'm not interested in "everybody here"; everybody here hasn't accused half the posters on the thread of being racist.
On that note, how's the child porn collection coming along?
None.How many people have you killed?