right. so despite my posts and despite other people's posts you thought you were being threatened. i suggested you bring it to the attention of the mods:Sigh.
You denied you were making threats at a time that I felt you were making threats. Remember?
When you say lying about 'other people' you really mean you don't you?
and i'd hardly do that if i'd been saying 'i'm on the next 21 to lewisham to wander the streets until by chance i happen upon you or someone who looks as i suspect you might'.yeh. if you think there's been a threat of violence you should bring it to the attention of the board moderators, who i am sure will treat any report you care to make with the attention it deserves.
So not lying then, glad we've cleared that up.right. so despite my posts and despite other people's posts you thought you were being threatened. i suggested you bring it to the attention of the mods:
and i'd hardly do that if i'd been saying 'i'm on the next 21 to lewisham to wander the streets until by chance i happen upon you or someone who looks as i suspect you might'.
yeh you've not been not lying.So not lying then, glad we've cleared that up.
Challenging the status quo was always going to bring considerable disruption... or to view it another way, considerable disruption was always going to be the ideal time to challenge the status quo.=It looks very much like we are heading for BINO - (brexit in name only) - which is completely pointless (as it offers not one single advantage over the present arrangement) , but will still result in considerable disruption and costs. This is because it is the only politically possible outcome.
Challenging the status quo was always going to bring considerable disruption... or to view it another way, considerable disruption was always going to be the ideal time to challenge the status quo.=
and the biggest cost of Brexit so far is being paid by the toffs with their reputation. Or don't you see that as an advantage?
That depends on the policies of who ever governs the country, and how they govern it after brexit. You and nobody knows that today. It's not really a thing that just because the tories were in charge when brexit happened, that they get to keep it forever - contrary to the trope repeated on here of the "tory brexit".With BINO there will still be considerable financial and time costs to the state. For zero benefit. How that will play out in its impact on the rest of us is too diffuse to tie down - but it will probably be resources - financial and personal - being redirected from more socially useful stuff like education and health, environmental management, health and safety,
that's part of the status quo that needs challenging. The toffs and corporations taking the piss. Some fair legislation put in place would be a start to stop the piss taking going on...or HMRC chasing tax evaders.
to reduce it to just johnsons twatishness isn't doing it justice. We had Cameron and Gideon previously. JRM making himself look a cunt every day of the week. That fact he's even in contention to take the reigns is laughable. The eton boys are scraping the barrel with every iteration . Showing themselves up in plain sight for what they are: not fit for purpose and a waste of 40k a year for a child's education.Boris Johnson being thought of as even more of a twat than before is really small potatoes.
Again, that battle hasn't been fought. It depends on the policies of who ever governs the country, and how they govern it after brexit.Overall, the state will have less money than it would have done - and that shortfall will be made up the usual way - by squeezing the public sector and benefit bills.
Over 90,000 people in 05, around 30,000 now. That's for every business, investment, tc claimant, child benefit getter, pension, dividend, company car allowance, director, actor, smuggler, worker, employer, taxi driver...everything....or HMRC chasing tax evaders...
HMRC.. the clue's in the name... intentionally armed with blunt pencils to fight brendas mates taking the piss from Caribbean islands.Over 90,000 people in 05, around 30,000 now. That's for every business, investment, tc claimant, child benefit getter, pension, dividend, company car allowance, director, actor, smuggler, worker, employer, taxi driver...everything.
Chasing tax evaders these days includes clawing back tax credits from the poorest in society.
More cuts to come.
The rich don't suffer. HMRC don't get near them.
As to offshore stuff...leaving lets the UK keep that, there are EU laws coming into force around Jan 19 (shocked face and loud music) to start smothering that shit. The upcoming change in tax laws was a notable thing in brexit.HMRC.. the clue's in the name... intentionally armed with blunt pencils to fight brendas mates taking the piss from Caribbean islands.
Arise, Sir Juncker, Knight of Anti Tax AvoidanceAs to offshore stuff...leaving lets the UK keep that, there are EU laws coming into force around Jan 19 (shocked face and loud music) to start smothering that shit. The upcoming change in tax laws was a notable thing in brexit.
Praiser of nakedly rigged elections.Arise, Sir Juncker, Knight of Anti Tax Avoidance
It was public knowledge at the time...any semi-aware brexiter knew they were voting for tax avoidance.Arise, Sir Juncker, Knight of Anti Tax Avoidance
and not to forget the reintroduction of proxy bomb use on the streets of Derry... as stated on the ballotIt was public knowledge at the time...any semi-aware brexiter knew they were voting for tax avoidance.
Over 90,000 people in 05, around 30,000 now. That's for every business, investment, tc claimant, child benefit getter, pension, dividend, company car allowance, director, actor, smuggler, worker, employer, taxi driver...everything.
EU didn't vote them in. EU didn't give the tories a majority the next time. EU doesn't give the UK a tory government most of the time. UK does that.Remember when the EU stopped the Tories and Lib Dems gutting the NHS? Happier times.
Well done. You seem to be suggesting this is why the referendum was called-at least I think that’s why you are mentioning timing. Everyone knows it was called because the Tories thought they (REMAIN) would win.
Not sure whether being smug about either cheap labour (ie people being paid shit wages) or people struggling to get work is a good look for progressives tbh.*wanders in*
anyways been watching the news today on the blue passport thingy..
does that give a good indication of the exit bring British manufacturing jobs back into the united kingdom
its cheaper to outsource it out of the country
everyone thought remain would win. I thought they would, I woke up the next day and the man on the news looked like he'd just had to pass a square turd with sharpened edges.the Tories thought they (REMAIN) would win.
Not sure whether being smug about either cheap labour (ie people being paid shit wages) or people struggling to get work is a good look for progressives tbh.
depends who's struggling to get work. if it's former tory mps then i'm all for a bit of smugness.Not sure whether being smug about either cheap labour (ie people being paid shit wages) or people struggling to get work is a good look for progressives tbh.