Subsequently reiterated?
Not in the 'subsequent' posts 6379 or 6383.
Either way retired from Trade Union activity or work in general the implication isn't easy to misunderstand.
I really don't feel worried about his or her personal digs by the way, or the implied dig about old people generally, I simply point out the hypocrisy to any of those oh so pure souls here who want to lecture about proper behaviour.
He or she said it, they ought to stand by it.
The general strategy here is not difficult to follow, dig out a poster, they defend themselves and therefore are accused of attention seeking and it all being 'look at me' or being a troll. It is bollocks. A poster earlier put me on ignore, wouldn't that be a better policy, a personal bit of what people these days call 'no platforming'?
No. this ^ is bollocks. kabbes correctly read the meaning in my posts. There was no dig about old people. I've not mentioned age. There was a dig, an explicit one, about you being a trade union activist whilst displaying such ignorant, wilfully blind views regarding the reasons many voted brexit and denouncing them on mass with a wave of your hand. Many of your union members may have voted out. Various unions have opposed the EU and were pro brexit. But Philosophical has spoken, they're all racists and his hands are clean.
What a joke.
Last edited: