Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Is Brexit actually going to happen?

Will we have a brexit?


  • Total voters
    362
It's intransigent. And your analogy is crap, it's more like a supermarket that has eggs in stock, but refuses to sell them to you because you stated your intention to start shopping elsewhere.
What do these eggs represent in your analogy?
 
Yes.

But that doesn't answer the question of why you are disgusted at their intransigence. They are in a negotiation where they want to secure the best deal for themselves. What specifically is it that they are doing that is disgusting?

So in your mind, negotiating a deal necessarily involves being obstructive and trying to set the other party up to fail? I hope I don't ever have to discuss the terms of anything with you.
 
So in your mind, negotiating a deal necessarily involves being obstructive and trying to set the other party up to fail? I hope I don't ever have to discuss the terms of anything with you.
You've still not said exactly what it is that they are doing that's not on. Can you give any examples?
 
You've still not said exactly what it is that they are doing that's not on. Can you give any examples?

...did you not see the article I linked to? It's just one of a number of options that the EU have denied the UK thus far. Doubtless progress in the negotiations is being hindered by the ramshackle government of May the Useless, but you're being obtuse if you really think the EU is entirely blameless for that.
 
...did you not see the article I linked to? It's just one of a number of options that the EU have denied the UK thus far. Doubtless progress in the negotiations is being hindered by the ramshackle government of May the Useless, but you're being obtuse if you really think the EU is entirely blameless for that.

The EU has a set of rules. Some are negotiable - and the UK has a history of getting opt-outs from those. Some are non-negotiable, like the 4 freedoms. The EU had been clear from the start of this process that the UK cannot get a better deal outside the EU than in. It cannot have all the benefits of the single market if it refuses to have freedom of movement.

The EU has a right to determine the rules of the club, and the UK has the right to walk away. It’s hardly intransigence to insist that the rules are followed.
 
...did you not see the article I linked to? It's just one of a number of options that the EU have denied the UK thus far. Doubtless progress in the negotiations is being hindered by the ramshackle government of May the Useless, but you're being obtuse if you really think the EU is entirely blameless for that.
I did read the article. What he says seems quite reasonable and predictable.
 
un_system_chart_large.png
 
Quick round up of what some of the parasites building careers in our movement have to say:

Tony Blair is helpfully making clear what his disciples in the Labour Party actually think by full on saying he thinks it's more important to stop Brexit than to get rid of the Tories: Stopping Brexit more important than Labour winning next election, says Tony Blair

Chuka Umunna, presumably in order to demonstrate how quickly he can respond to Blair's orders, is demanding that Labour come out in support of remaining in the single market, basically meaning we stay in the EU but don't get a seat at the table, can see that being a real vote winner: Labour must say it: Britain should stay in the single market after Brexit | Chuka Umunna

And perhaps most breath takingly offensively, Frances O'Grady says Watch out, the Brexiteers might be coming for your paid holidays | Frances O’Grady - but doesn't say a damn thing about what the TUC would do if this semi collapsed zombie government were to try and scrap the working time directive. Presumably she feels an article in the Guardian warning about something that might happen is sufficient.

Not that the WTD applies to most young low paid workers who are forced to opt out of it of course. But for fucks sakes Frances, you're the head of the TUC, what is the POINT of you?
 
Facilitating the demobilisation and channeling of union power into ineffective avenues whenever possible, mainly. Though it has to be said Frances is pretty limp even for that role.

I was one of the 100 or so people who watched her internet steamed interview with Eddie Izzard for heart unions week a wee while back during the "fightback" against the Trade Union Bill. Izzard managed to come of as the more militant of the two.

Having listened to her telling the audience to lobby anyone they might know in the House of Lords (seriously) Eddie asked "Is there anything we can do beyond that?"

Cue awkward silence.
 
Especially given this: Brexit: Chief EU negotiator says 'no way' to bespoke trade deal for UK

The May government might be fucking Brexit up royally, but even if they weren't the intransigence of the Eurocrats is disgusting.
on what you quote, not really. They can offer a deal which they know ALL their members will accept - and virtually none of their members will accept giving the UK a deal that leaves us better off outside.
In other words, no cake and eat it extra special favour.
As, tbf, they have pretty much said all along
 
Once we leave the EU, the Tories aren't going to stand up in Parliament and say "Yay we're free now let's shit all over the plebs!" (OK one or two might think it). It will happen slowly over a period of a couple of years and in the name of economic growth not restricting rights (they never say that), Instead of opting out of the 48hr WTD, you'll be opted out automatically and have to opt in, then there will be 'special cases' where your employer can decide you can't opt in. Then things like holiday rights or maternity rights will get reduced, not all at once but a bit at a time since we need to be more competitive.
In the absence of the EU the next best thing is a strong Trade Union movement which we no longer have, Even now the UK has the most restrictive labour laws in the EU and only something like 25% of the workforce are in one.
The people who need to be a union the most are the least likely to be in one and would find it hardest to organise without being victimised.
of course if we elect a Labour government (assuming it follows it current leadership philosophy) soon after Brexit then this will happen much slower but the Tories will get back in eventually in 5 years or 10 so in the long term its hard not to imagine that employment rights will be lost.
 
Sorry to be always posting from Twitter, but here are a couple of interesting threads:

Guardian Brussels Corespondent after an interview with Michael Barnier on the EU view of negotiations:



A former UK trade negotiator (now there's a specialist job!) who is now an adamant Stop Brexit person on what he sees as political negatives of the process:

Unrolled thread from @GuitarMoog
 
Oh, and a short but sweet one!

Screenshot-2017-12-20 (3) Twitter.png

If you are interested in following Brexit on Twitter, this man is a good person to follow, particularly as he has an interesting and unusual perspective. He is basically very centrist/soft left, and writes for the Financial Times on legal things. He is a former Eurosceptic who believes the UK should have left at the time of the Maastricht Treaty, after which - he says - leaving became too complex and costly to be a practical proposition. So, he doesn't like the EU, but he doesn't like leaving it either.
 
That’s probably my view. Don’t particularly like the EU but wonder if leaving is worth the effort & will it achieve anything? Something along the lines of better being inside the tent pissing out than outside the tent pissing in. Possibly. Caller to LBC yesterday hit nail on head. “Leavers(the ones that call radio phone in shows anyway)only want to leave. They don’t want to know about trade deals or the Irish border”.
 
Oh, and a short but sweet one!

View attachment 123462

If you are interested in following Brexit on Twitter, this man is a good person to follow, particularly as he has an interesting and unusual perspective. He is basically very centrist/soft left, and writes for the Financial Times on legal things. He is a former Eurosceptic who believes the UK should have left at the time of the Maastricht Treaty, after which - he says - leaving became too complex and costly to be a practical proposition. So, he doesn't like the EU, but he doesn't like leaving it either.
This lib-dem party members previous euro-scepticism largely consisted of him arguing the EU wasn't liberal enough - liberal that is, in the sense of aggressively pushing free trade - which in the modern era means aggressive neo-liberalism.
 
That’s probably my view. Don’t particularly like the EU but wonder if leaving is worth the effort & will it achieve anything? Something along the lines of better being inside the tent pissing out than outside the tent pissing in. Possibly. Caller to LBC yesterday hit nail on head. “Leavers(the ones that call radio phone in shows anyway)only want to leave. They don’t want to know about trade deals or the Irish border”.

Why the referendum was a terrible idea, in a nutshell.
 
This lib-dem party members previous euro-scepticism largely consisted of him arguing the EU wasn't liberal enough - liberal that is, in the sense of aggressively pushing free trade - which in the modern era means aggressive neo-liberalism.

I did initially think he was a Tory. I hadn't heard of him before, but I have heard of his blog, Jack of Kent, but I've never read it.

Here's his Sceptic tweet:


David Allen Green on Twitter.png
 
He's long been a friend of this board. His nuanced and sensible non-extremist liberalism consists exactly of denial that the ideological positions he takes and assumptions he starts from are in anyway ideological. Like much of recent postings on this thread in fact.
 
Back
Top Bottom