spring-peeper said:Afghan just signed a telephony contract with Etisalat. Bringing a communication system into the area is something requires a government. Actually, most of the things that Afghan wants for its citizens require some form of government. They chose the democratic model.
Could you please point out the horrid realities to me?
btw: there a lot of Canadian towns that pride themselves on their celtic roots and work hard to preserve this culture.
nino_savatte said:"Point out the horrid realities" to you? I'd have thought that was obvious. I'm not here to do your work for you btw.
spring-peeper said:You do my work for me? I've got four kids...you can't handle my job.
I guess that if you wish to make broad, sweeping generalizations and refuse of offer any examples, that's your choice. Free speech and all that.
nino_savatte said:You're either thick or playing at being thick. Do you honestly think Afghanistan is some sort of paragon of 'freedom and democracy'?
Do me a favour.
spring-peeper said:Where ever did you get that notion from?
I guess I really am thick, aren't I?
Do me a favour and show me which one of my post(s) would have lead you to believe that I would hold this country up as a shining example of 'democracy and freedom'?
nino_savatte said:Well, you've asked me to prove that Afghanistan is not in a horrible state. That says to me that you believe it to be a place where democracy and freedom flourish. The warlords control the country outside of Kabul. I don't see that as being free or democratic. These are the same people who rely heavily on opium production to buy arms and to hold onto power. This has been the case for decades.
This is why many people refer to Karzai as "The Mayor of Kabul".
you said:However my point is this: Afghanistan was not invaded or occupied with democratic principles in mind; it was a military/police operation designed (ha) to defeat the Taliban, AQ et al. The idea of 'democracy' came second to military action. To say that those troops from the UK, US, Canada and other countries are there for the purpose of fighting for 'freedom' and 'democracy' is a little too simplisitic and rather reductive to say ther least. It's an easy way to avoid thinking about the horrible realities of this ugly conflict.
me said:Could you please point out the horrid realities to me?
Major Tom said:no - i consider myself fairly impartial re US versus USSR - i was opposed to both superpowers - but of course there's only one now.
You seem to think that just cos I oppose US actions, suddenly I must support their enemy. Very puzzling logic there.
I do think you are choosing to ignore the reality that the US government wished to draw the USSR into a resource draining war in Afghanistan - and did what was necessary to cause this to happen. Why can;t you deal with those facts before calling me creepy.
but they didn't
I don;t think you know what logic is
all america all the time
Greatest Danger to Afghanistan
Taliban..............................41%
Drug Traffickers...................28
Warlords.............................22
U.S.....................................4
Current Afghanistan Govt........2
----------
Views of the United States
Eighty-three percent of Afghans express a favorable opinion of the United States overall, similar to the 87 percent who call the U.S.-led overthrow of the Taliban a good thing. That compares to favorable ratings of a mere 8 percent for the Taliban, and 5 percent for bin Laden. People who are unhappy with their local living conditions are twice as likely to have an unfavorable opinion of the United States.
Support for the United States is less than full-throated. Far fewer, 24 percent, regard it "very" favorably. And while 68 percent rate the work of the United States in Afghanistan positively, that's well below the ratings given to Karzai, the United Nations or the present Afghan government (83 percent, 82 percent and 80 percent positive, respectively).
Still, an 83 percent favorable rating for the United States, and a 68 percent positive work performance rating, are remarkable — in sharp contrast to negative views of the United States in many other Muslim nations. (Another contrast is Karzai's job rating — 83 percent positive — compared with President Bush's in the United States, where 39 percent of Americans approved in the last ABC News/Washington Post poll.)
so who's doing most of the killing? I know a US national was killed last week, but surely there have been more attrocities? And who is it who's turning a blind eye to the opium trade? who's to blame? Surely it's the Natos, (and those evil satanists who foerced them to go there in the first place, the taliban/ Bin Laden's 9-11 bombers)spring-peeper said:
spring-peeper said:No, I didn't.
I wasn't claiming that Afghanistan was a shining whatever. I was asking you which horrible realities you were thinking of.
Once again, nino, you are looking for something that isn't there.
mears said:Thats right, blame America for everything including the Soviets invasion of Afghanistan. All America all the time indeed.
The Soviets could have put an economic embargo on Afghanistan as the US did with Cuba. They could have withdrawn their embassador. They could have funneled arms to communist elements.
Instead they took the option of full scale invasion. There were plenty of options on the table but the Soviets took the most extreme. And look at the results.
You are more interested in blaming all the worlds problems, past and present, on the US. Eyes wide shut
mears said:The people are speaking:
"77 percent of Afghans say their country is headed in the right direction — compared with 30 percent in the vastly better-off United States. Ninety-one percent prefer the current Afghan government to the Taliban regime, and 87 percent call the U.S.-led overthrow of the Taliban good for their country. Osama bin Laden, for his part, is as unpopular as the Taliban; nine in 10 view him unfavorably."
"Despite the country's continued problems, 85 percent of Afghans say living conditions there are better now than they were under the Taliban. Eighty percent cite improved freedom to express political views. And 75 percent say their security from crime and violence has improved as well. After decades of oppression and war, many Afghans see a better life."
http://abcnews.go.com/International/PollVault/story?id=1363276
No one has a comment on this?
Eyes wide shut...
Major Tom said:no - i consider myself fairly impartial re US versus USSR - i was opposed to both superpowers - but of course there's only one now.
You seem to think that just cos I oppose US actions, suddenly I must support their enemy. Very puzzling logic there.
mears said:The people are speaking:
"77 percent of Afghans say their country is headed in the right direction — compared with 30 percent in the vastly better-off United States. Ninety-one percent prefer the current Afghan government to the Taliban regime, and 87 percent call the U.S.-led overthrow of the Taliban good for their country. Osama bin Laden, for his part, is as unpopular as the Taliban; nine in 10 view him unfavorably."
"Despite the country's continued problems, 85 percent of Afghans say living conditions there are better now than they were under the Taliban. Eighty percent cite improved freedom to express political views. And 75 percent say their security from crime and violence has improved as well. After decades of oppression and war, many Afghans see a better life."
http://abcnews.go.com/International/PollVault/story?id=1363276
No one has a comment on this?
Eyes wide shut...
Ooohhh.... means a lot coming from you.nino_savatte said:I regard that a dishonest in the extreme.
dilute micro said:Ooohhh.... means a lot coming from you.
nino_savatte said:"The people" are doing what, mears? You've taken this from a single source and have presented this as the gospel truth. It's one survey that was conducted by a US based news organisation. It's hardly proof that things are getting better.
nino_savatte said:It's the way you claimed that your soldiers were fighting for "freedom and democracy" that gets me. For a Canadian, you don't half come out with a lot of Yank-sounding crap.
nino_savatte said:"The people" are doing what, mears? You've taken this from a single source and have presented this as the gospel truth. It's one survey that was conducted by a US based news organisation. It's hardly proof that things are getting better.
spring-peeper said:Give me proof that his survey is wrong. Come on - you seem to know what these people are thinking.
spring-peeper said:Give me your critieria for measuring improvement. I'll see what I can find for you.
nino_savatte said:What are you talking about?
spring-peeper said:You said that things are not improving. Based on what? What criteria do you use to assess if a situation is improving or deteriorating?
nino_savatte said:Give you "proof that the survey is wrong"? What kind of ridiculous statement is that? This survey was conducted by a single news organisation fo a particular ideological purpose: to make people like you feel better so that you could justify the continued presence of foreign troops in Afghanistan.
Do you know anything about surveys and how they are put together?