butchersapron
Bring back hanging
On that C$ piece:
How much evidence is there of long term high level UK paedophile ring?
- Thread starter free spirit
- Start date
Bedgewick3
Well-Known Member
What's Watson's game here? Is he deliberately lying to embarrass the Tories or has the publicity he got over hacking gone to his head?
Nasty man.
Nasty man.
butchersapron
Bring back hanging
It's both - but what's the problem? Why nasty?
butchersapron
Bring back hanging
Quite possibly, but at least they are now in there.
he maybe a publicity hungry cheesepiece but he is at least standing up and saying this stuff in parliament.
butchersapron
Bring back hanging
c4 now
butchersapron
Bring back hanging
Note the C4 news saying grandee rather than politician.
butchersapron
Bring back hanging
Already done but not sure we had connected him with north wales. If that connection is solid we have real trouble.
butchersapron
Bring back hanging
Those photos were used in a prosecution - they existed.
good point. i do understand it is probably just the start.
elbows
Well-Known Member
Can you remind me where this is mentioned?
Also I'm scratching my head slightly that a high-profile tory would allow themselves to be photographed, but I dont claim its impossible.
Badger Kitten
oof
People with better political memories than me, does this feel like a tipping point? A tsunami of filth that could engulf the Establishment? Or will it just go away and back to business as usual? Am struggling to think of anything in the past that was quite so toxic and extreme as this...this story has run for over a month now and seems to be still just beginning...
elbows
Well-Known Member
He had been connected before, both in the distant past and in the last week or so. It's one of the reasons I bothered to spend so much time on this stuff recently.
butchersapron
Bring back hanging
Fair play, i'm having trouble keeping what and who is relevant to the forefront.
elbows
Well-Known Member
It's got immense potential, somewhat limited by a likely lack of direct evidence, and that a lot of the current tories are not from the Thatcher era.
One of the biggest problems they've got is that they are damned either way, in some ways it might be better for them if someone can be found guilty otherwise people will just assume its another coverup.
Whatever happens its only going to accelerate peoples distrust of the establishment and its minions.
elbows
Well-Known Member
Tell me about it! I've mangled my brain on this stuff and will have to take a break at some point.
elbows
Well-Known Member
An example, as made reference to on C4 earlier.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...paedophile-preyed-boys-home--Hague-known.html
kavenism
Progressive misanthrope
Which is amusing given his own history of sexual improprieties. Not kids by the way, but he's still an unscrupulous fuck who I’ve had rather more to do with than I’d wish.
butchersapron
Bring back hanging
God, i even posted about it myself.
elbows said:
Agreed , there were monents in c4 discussion that led directly into his setting up of review but they just didn't go down that road
Re earlier Crick text, I felt o'brien may not have been convinced by all of messham's answers. Anyone else get that or am I just reading him wrong? Discussion between them possibly where crick's text came from?
elbows
Well-Known Member
Thats going to be a problem with Messham just as it has been in the past. But they are still willing to air interviews with him so they arent writing him off completely.
There are numerous possibilities when it comes to Cricks scepticism. It could be any number of details, but bearing in mind that Crick is a political journalist I would not be surprised if at least some of his doubts are based on talking to a range of political contacts.
Corax
Luke 5:16
Quite. And his corpse stinks of decoy and scapegoat.
Similar threads
- Poll
