This gives Council officers and Hondo more time to do a few alterations to scheme to make it palatable to the more impressionable members of the committee.
We need to show our support for the officers who stood up to this Tower o'Shite in the meantime because they're going to come under a heap of pressure from Nu-Labour Lambeth.
Fuck me. Thanks for all your reporting. It was brilliant.
God this officer loves the "ecosystem" which he seemed unable to explain.
That didn't stop the Brixton Project rushing to become Hondo's lapdogs.Cllr Kinds questions about the community space ad the answers he got made me think the community space idea that the officers were promoting as a benefit was not thought out.
I'd love to see the IP addresses for this sudden, last minute outpouring of support for the scheme.I wonder if McWilliams went around personally asking for support?
After looking at their website I have no idea what they do. Is like someone used a buzzword generator to spit out 10 paragraphs.That didn't stop the Brixton Project rushing to become Hondo's lapdogs.
Well, that sounds like a wonderful scheme. Just what the country needs.A bit of a detour to West Africa - to report on progress on Ghana's $100 million mega cathedral, designed by David Adjaye. I have attached an FT article from 2018 which was quite critical at the time. A $100 million cathedral in a country where the per capita income is $2,000. The FT ironically says "Plans to build a colossal cathedral by renowned Ghanaian architect David Adjaye in Accra have resurrected a species thought to be extinct — white elephants."
Great to see Tricky Skills back in action on a Lambeth story!Superb, in depth reporting here
Lambeth Planning Committee votes 5-2 in favour of deferring Hondo Enormo-Tower application for Pope’s Road in Brixton
Lambeth Council’s Planning Committee voted 5-2 in favour of deferring a decision on the Hondo Tower application for Pope’s Road on Tuesday evening.www.brixtonbuzz.com
There were quite a lot of whispered "WTFs" about the bombastic and over-scaled nature of this project from fellow visitors to the David Adjaye "retrospective"/vanity exhibition at the Design Museum last year.Well, that sounds like a wonderful scheme. Just what the country needs.
Can't say it's particularly attractive either.
David Adjaye unveils plans for National Cathedral of Ghana in Accra
Architect David Adjaye has revealed designs for a cathedral in Ghanaian capital Accra, which will host a 5,000-seat auditorium beneath a concave roofwww.dezeen.com
There was a pilot of "business rates retention" which all London boroughs have been part of since 2018, by which they (and the GLA) can keep 100% of the "real terms increase" in their business rates. However, not sure what the baseline is - presumably a lot of business rates has been lost to "permitted development" conversions of office space to retail in recent years?Agree. Excellent report. Just wondering if anyone reading these posts could estimate how much of the estimated £2.4 million annual income from business rates would be retained by Lambeth. The situation re business rate retention is changing all the time - you'd need Phd in local government finance to keep up - but my understanding is that in 2020/21 the situation for London councils is that 33% of business rate income is handed over to the Treasury, 37% goes to the GLA and just 33% is retained by the local authority which collects it. On top of that, London Councils entered into a voluntary arrangement a couple of years ago whereby they and the GLA put their 33%/37% shares into a London Pool, which is then shared out between the boroughs and the GLA. If these arrangements continue, then Lambeth's share of the business rate income from the Hondo monster will be a lot less than the £2.4 million a year claimed by planning officers.
Thanks for that. My understanding is that the scheme that enabled London boroughs and the GLA to retain 100% of the increase in the value of the business rates they collected was a pilot and the Government decided not to continue it in 2020/21 so we're back to the pre-pilot arrangement with the Treasury taking 33% and the remaining 67% going into the London Pool. I think would be good if someone could get a response from the Council on this. One of us could do an FOI, but would be quicker if one of the councillors could do a members enquiry (have suggested this to Jessica Leigh).There was a pilot of "business rates retention" which all London boroughs have been part of since 2018, by which they (and the GLA) can keep 100% of the "real terms increase" in their business rates. However, not sure what the baseline is - presumably a lot of business rates has been lost to "permitted development" conversions of office space to retail in recent years?
100% business rate retention pilots: what can be learnt and at what cost?
But did they privately mail in their messages of support because they're not listed on the Planning site where everyone else had to register their opinion. This seems extraordinarily fishy - a bit like the time honoured 'many PMs of support' line here.One of the councillors asked about this at the meeting last night. From memory, so can't swear on this, the answer from officers was that a majority of respondents had a Lambeth address and were local businesses. The councillor who asked the question tried to probe a bit more into this - e.g. how many were from traders who are tenants of Hondo - but didn't get very far.
I am suspicious as hell as to who solicited the extra 115 responses in support, but the way they were summarised in the first "Addendum" paper for the committee is the same approach as when loads of objectors sign a last minute petition or form letter against a planning application after the statutory deadline.But did they privately mail in their messages of support because they're not listed on the Planning site where everyone else had to register their opinion. This seems extraordinarily fishy - a bit like the time honoured 'many PMs of support' line here.