Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Hillsborough Independent Panel findings and release of documents.

Couldn't agree more with William's link. Some possibilities for reform:-

However the prosecution was actually conducted, the appearance of a conflict of interest when the state prosecutes its own agents is too great: I see no reason that the families shouldn't have been allowed to direct their own private prosecution, with public funds if needs be.

It also reaffirms my belief that judges should be stopped from summing up the facts, as they are in other jurisdictions, including many states of the union: with the best will in the world, it's extremely hard to do impartially, is responsible for a ton of appeals, and I doubt that any aid it gives to the jury's understanding is sufficient to justify these pitfalls.
 
Whatever the systemic failings, there were specific accusations against the ex-super's decisions, accusations more than sufficient to justify a trial.

Having made the decision to try him, it was the worst of all worlds to give special treatment like allowing him to sit on the defence benches instead of in the prisoner's dock, or to gloss over the inquest evidence. Better to have dropped the case then run it like that.
 
You have to wait for him to die even if he does go to prison, for true justice to occur. Keeping this sort of cunt in jail is just prolonging the inevitable release. Maybe like old people in care his goal should be paid for from his payout pot but lets face it even in his caravan in Whitby his retirement is bloodied with guilt.

Let's just dance on his grave like we did with the witch ;)

ETA how I really felt yesterday.

Fuck him. Does he look happy these days?
 
Last edited:
tbf, it was a Jury trial, although there were serious questions concerning the judges too-favourable handling of dukenfield
Yes, it was a jury trial, but since judges have vast powers of influence over juries, the concerns you note can easily swing the verdict. Judges decide which evidence is heard, frame that allowed in, can shut down cross-examination or even question witnesses themselves, can make it plain to the jury through their expressions what they think of witnesses, and perhaps most crucially of all, get to sum up the facts after prosecution and defence have delivered their closing speeches.

A judge's handling of the case is made all the more crucial by the weakened state of English juries after decades of ill-considered reforms (teenage jurors, random selection off the electoral register, juries allowed to fall below twelve and the possibility of decision by a supermajority). I don't want to focus on one judge without knowing the full details, but it does illustrate the urgency of reforms. No families should be left feeling as these have.
 
I would have liked to see charges for destroying evidence, perverting the course of justice etc. Realistically though such charges wouldn't stand a much better chance of success.

Ask and ye shall receive.

Two former South Yorkshire police officers and the force’s lawyer at the time of the Hillsborough stadium disaster in 1989 face trial on Monday charged with perverting the course of justice over the amendment of police statements about the tragedy.

Peter Metcalf, who was a partner at the firm of solicitors that acted for the force, Hammond Suddards; Donald Denton, a South Yorkshire police chief superintendent at the time; and Alan Foster, a detective chief inspector, were charged with the offences in 2017, after the conclusion of the new inquests into how 96 people died at the football ground.

 
Their was the initial fuck up people died.
Shit was piled on the dead that people belived because football fans had a terrible reputation.
So the cover up got worse and worse to justify the initial fuck up.😡
The court cases were too late and pretty ropey
 
Back
Top Bottom