Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Golliwog in the window - should this really be in court?

How very fucking dare you. You're an adult now, and should know better. Frogwoman said nothing that chimes with your vile attitude.

Golliwogs are evil.
Golliwogs are evil.
Golliwogs are evil.
Golliwogs are evil.
Golliwogs are evil.
Golliwogs are evil.
Golliwogs are evil.
Golliwogs are evil.
Golliwogs are evil.
Golliwogs are evil.
Golliwogs are evil.
Golliwogs are evil.
Golliwogs are evil.
Golliwogs are evil.
Golliwogs are evil.
Golliwogs are evil.
Golliwogs are evil.
Golliwogs are evil.


Happy now?
 
Therefore it's OK for you to remain entirely ignorant, defend your ignorance at every possible opportunity, and remain ignorant despite all opportunities to learn something?

Fuck off.
 
Therefore it's OK for you to remain entirely ignorant, defend your ignorance at every possible opportunity, and remain ignorant despite all opportunities to learn something?

Fuck off.


In local language, I'm jerking you around.


Relax, take a chill pill, whatever.
 
In local language, I'm jerking you around.


Relax, take a chill pill, whatever.
And as has already been pointed out, using racism to wind people up makes you a jerk. As does using "I was trolling" to backtrack.

I'd be happier if you admittedly that having your son's genitalia mutilated for asthetic reasons was wrong tbh
This, however is unfair. That information was revealed in a private PM and wrongly posted by someone else. Plus bringing in cross-thread beef is entirely unnecessary when she's being a fucking arsehole on this thread anyway.

(I am studiously avoiding use of the word cunt because it is misogynist in North America. Really quite difficult, but am trying to avoid being a blatant hypocrite.)
 
And as has already been pointed out, using racism to wind people up makes you a jerk. As does using "I was trolling" to backtrack.


This, however is unfair. That information was revealed in a private PM and wrongly posted by someone else. Plus bringing in cross-thread beef is entirely unnecessary when she's being a fucking arsehole on this thread anyway.

(I am studiously avoiding use of the word cunt because it is misogynist in North America. Really quite difficult, but am trying to avoid being a blatant hypocrite.)

I have too many people on ignore who are posting on this thread. I have no idea what you are talking about or referring to.

Go trash me if you want. Have fun. The purpose of this forum is to entertain yourself. This seems to be something that you find entertaining.

I find it annoying - stupid little alerts keep popping up and all.

Go and have your fun, enjoy.....


And as always, love, peace and harmony.


:)
 
This, however is unfair. That information was revealed in a private PM and wrongly posted by someone else. Plus bringing in cross-thread beef is entirely unnecessary when she's being a fucking arsehole on this thread anyway.

Actually she posted it openly on a thread, not that I intend to find it, as I agree with the bit I have bolded.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ymu
She posted about the fact that her son(s?) was circumcised, not the reason for it. Fair dos on not dragging that thread up though!

E2A: I just did a quick search - she has posted openly about it, you're right. The PM thing happened before those, unless my memory is letting me down bigtime.

As you were. :)
 
Took this pic of them with the royal wedding teddy bears when in York at the end of 2011, in a shop on the Shambles.

golli.jpg
 
Golliwogs are evil.
Golliwogs are evil.
Golliwogs are evil.
Golliwogs are evil.
Golliwogs are evil.
Golliwogs are evil.
Golliwogs are evil.
Golliwogs are evil.
Golliwogs are evil.
Golliwogs are evil.
Golliwogs are evil.
Golliwogs are evil.
Golliwogs are evil.
Golliwogs are evil.
Golliwogs are evil.
Golliwogs are evil.
Golliwogs are evil.
Golliwogs are evil.


Happy now?

http://www.sterlingtimes.co.uk/POLITICALLY_INCORRECT5.htm
 
She posted about the fact that her son(s?) was circumcised, not the reason for it. Fair dos on not dragging that thread up though!

E2A: I just did a quick search - she has posted openly about it, you're right. The PM thing happened before those, unless my memory is letting me down bigtime.

As you were. :)

What does that have to do with anything?
 
Pretty sure you can work that out for yourself, if you read the posts above it.
 
I have too many people on ignore who are posting on this thread. I have no idea what you are talking about or referring to.

Go trash me if you want. Have fun. The purpose of this forum is to entertain yourself. This seems to be something that you find entertaining.

I find it annoying - stupid little alerts keep popping up and all.

Go and have your fun, enjoy.....


And as always, love, peace and harmony.


:)

What the fuck is wrong with you?
 
Me too, it wasn't until reading an old Enid Blyton book where one of the Golliwog characters was called Nigger that I realised...

I must admit that as a child I never associated golliowgs or robertson's jam with anything other than a cute cuddly toy.
 
Golliwogs are evil.
Golliwogs are evil.
Golliwogs are evil.
Golliwogs are evil.
Golliwogs are evil.
Golliwogs are evil.
Golliwogs are evil.
Golliwogs are evil.
Golliwogs are evil.
Golliwogs are evil.
Golliwogs are evil.
Golliwogs are evil.
Golliwogs are evil.
Golliwogs are evil.
Golliwogs are evil.
Golliwogs are evil.
Golliwogs are evil.
Golliwogs are evil.


Happy now?
To be honest, in Britain it's not not that golliwogs are evil, it's that they are offensive and that people who use them to taunt others are racists.
 
To be honest, in Britain it's not not that golliwogs are evil, it's that they are offensive and that people who use them to taunt others are racists.

Racists use monkey chants to taunt others. What will we do about the Monkey?

The Monkey itself is not offensive.
 
Monkey's aren't chanting in order to offend anyone. :confused:

I never said they were.

Read the statement I responded too, which suggested that Golliowgs are offensive because they are used to taunt.

Monkey chants are used to taunt.
 
Monkey chants don't sound like monkeys and golliwogs don't look like people. They are both [insert adjective] characterisations, in a similar way to cartoons of Jews with distorted features.
 
I don't think it is a bizarre anaology. Because I don't believe the Golliwog character or toy was created as a shorthand for depicting black people or as a weapon of racism.

I fully accept that it became those things. I don't believe it was intended to be those things.
 
You have developed a revisionist history of golliwogs? Post it up then. Hardly fair to make the argument whilst with-holding your stunning new evidence on their true origins.
 
Read the statement I responded too, which suggested that Golliowgs are offensive because they are used to taunt.
That's not what I meant, I meant that they are offensive and that's why they are used to taunt. Sorry if I misled you :)
I don't find monkeys offensive by the way :)
 
I never said they were.

Read the statement I responded too, which suggested that Golliowgs are offensive because they are used to taunt.

Monkey chants are used to taunt.
Eh? Monkeys are monkeys. Monkey-chanting racists want to compare some people to monkeys with the implication that the rest of humanity is not similarly simian. The chants are offensive because of that comparison, not because monkeys are inherently offensive creatures.

Golliwogs are, as ymu says, a racist stereotype of people to begin with.
 
Back
Top Bottom