Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
*corrected for you*what are you on?
*corrected for you*what are you on?
Cunt is an entirely unisex word in the UK. It's only in the US that they reserve it for women, much like we do the word bitch. I wouldn't have commented had he used it instead.Hmmm. 'bitch' is a tricky one. I don't like the word much, but then there aren't many gender-specific, or even gender-neutral, words of abuse you can use for a woman. 'bastard' doesn't work. Neither does 'wanker'. On here, 'cunt' is pretty unisex, but irl it's really only used for men in the UK. 'prick' doesn't work. Not much left really. 'cow'? Dunno. What would you suggest (bearing in mind that you do use words of abuse against other posters yourself)?
i think so but i can't comprehend why someone would do that.is ymu really equating Blagsta calling 5tella a bitch with calling someone nigger?
fucking hell.
also dragging an RIP thread into this shitstorm really is one of the lowest things I've ever seen on Urban, if not the actual lowest.
Yepalso dragging an RIP thread into this shitstorm really is one of the lowest things I've ever seen on Urban, if not the actual lowest.
plumbing the depthsTrying to score points on an rip thread. Truly the lowest of the low
If I heard a man calling a woman 'cunt' in the UK, I'd just be a bit puzzled, tbh. I'd think they had been watching too many US films.nah, in real life it's more common for it to refer just to men tbh. i think some people would find it offensive if it was addressed to a woman. (not that i do,just saying)
I don't see the need for insults to identify an attribute like sex or race or sexuality (or hair colour or shortsightedness or baldness or fatness or anything else irrelevant). If the speaker feels the need to do so, it suggests that they feel that attribute is somehow adding to the insult. Descending into sexist or racist language just because you're annoyed with someone says something about your mindset. I'm surprised it's a contentious point when even the world of football is finally getting to grips with this.IRL I really would say that most people - and particularly most men - only use the word cunt about men. tbh, I'd think that 'bitch' is kind of the female equivalent in terms of the strength of feeling behind it, and the connotations of, well, cuntery.
I don't think it's straightforward in the sense that it's not a word with clearly nasty taboo connotations attached to it in a way that no right-thinking person would use it.
I agree.Stella's comment was completely out of order.
Prick - man's part of body to describe a man.what exactly is not sexist about using a derogatory term for a part of a woman's anatomy to describe a man?
i.e. pussy, only more crass?
I'm not insisting. I'm just saying that this is normal usage. That's all.I disagree that bastard, cunt or wanker are male-specific terms. Maybe you just don't hear many women swear at each other?
If you insist that they are male specific, arsehole seems like a perfectly good compromise.
Jesus, this thread has turned fucking evil.
I'm not insisting. I'm just saying that this is normal usage. That's all.
A lot of women call each other 'cow' or 'bitch' ime, fwiw.
Prick - man's part of body to describe a man.
Cunt - woman's part of body to describe a man.
It isn't sexist. It's a hangover from Victorian prudishness about talking about genitalia in polite company.
well, I'm a woman and I disagree. Not that it actually bothers me, just that it's laughable to say it's not sexist. because it clearly is. like calling something "gay" is homophobic, even though most of us started using it long before we knew what it actually meant, as an insult to mean "lame" which imo has nothing to do with gayness.
Both male and female genitalia are used, though. prick, nob, cock: all insults. As is cunt. They've acquired certain specific connotations over the decades, but they're all taboo in polite company. Ah, but the female genitalia are reserved for the worst word? Well, fanny here in the UK is quite a mild term of abuse, so that argument doesn't quite work.well, I'm a woman and I disagree. Not that it actually bothers me, just that it's laughable to say it's not sexist. because it clearly is. like calling something "gay" is homophobic, even though most of us started using it long before we knew what it actually meant, as an insult to mean "lame" which imo has nothing to do with gayness.
well, I'm a woman
It's not the same thing at all.well, I'm a woman and I disagree. Not that it actually bothers me, just that it's laughable to say it's not sexist. because it clearly is. like calling something "gay" is homophobic, even though most of us started using it long before we knew what it actually meant, as an insult to mean "lame" which imo has nothing to do with gayness.
Victorian prudishness mostly. We still live in the rump-end of the Victorian era in many ways.Why sexual organs though?