My impression was there is an absolutely legitimate strike wave happening and the AFD are trying to put themselves at the heart of it....I thought it very interesting that you've got a far right party (doing amazingly well in the polls, second place 23pc approx.) effectively calling for a general strike, a strong red-brown play.. it would be interesting to know when the last time any political party of significance in Europe supported a general strike, I can't imagine it happens very oftenThere does seem to be some evidence of the AFD and also another right wing group getting involved however I'm not sure that that delegitimises the issue around the fuel subsidies being cut due to last year's ruling by the court about the budget not being constitutional. The main rail union are on strike next week however they don't seem to have been tainted with the right wing.
The farmers are not farm workers, they are farm owners, and the lorry drivers are apparently self-employed, so the actions of these two groups are not actually strikes. The AfD would be supporting actions by groups who are neither part of the working class, nor of the class of large capitalists. This social layer has historically been the base of fascismMy impression was there is an absolutely legitimate strike wave happening and the AFD are trying to put themselves at the heart of it....I thought it very interesting that you've got a far right party (doing amazingly well in the polls, second place 23pc approx.) effectively calling for a general strike, a strong red-brown play.. it would be interesting to know when the last time any political party of significance in Europe supported a general strike, I can't imagine it happens very often
Putin is not some puppet master pulling strings.Like the protests on the Polish border, which were based around legitimate grievances, the far right is involved likely to do their patron Putin’s bidding and fuck shit up a bit.
Ah, PoujadismThe farmers are not farm workers, they are farm owners, and the lorry drivers are apparently self-employed, so the actions of these two groups are not actually strikes. The AfD would be supporting actions by groups who are neither part of the working class, nor of the class of large capitalists. This social layer has historically been the base of fascism
I hear what you are saying and no doubt there is a petit booj element here, but the current wave includes farmers, truck drivers, train drivers and also doctors.The farmers are not farm workers, they are farm owners, and the lorry drivers are apparently self-employed, so the actions of these two groups are not actually strikes. The AfD would be supporting actions by groups who are neither part of the working class, nor of the class of large capitalists. This social layer has historically been the base of fascism
The last German politiker to talk about mass deportations was Scholz, if memory serves."Politicians from Germany’s far-right Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) party, including a personal aide to its leader Alice Weidel, met the head of the rightwing extremist Identitarian Movement and neo-Nazi activists to discuss a “masterplan” for mass deportations in the event of the party coming to power, it has been reported."Politicians from Germany’s AfD met extremist group to discuss deportation ‘masterplan’
Martin Sellner, member of the Identitarian Movement, reportedly spoke of ‘re-migration’ ideaswww.theguardian.com
AfD are no joke
Of those that don't support the Israeli StateThe last German politiker to talk about mass deportations was Scholz, if memory serves.
I missed that, in what context?The last German politiker to talk about mass deportations was Scholz, if memory serves.
This is an interesting couple of lines:Get ready for the worst
Germany’s political crisis is a warning for Keir Starmer.www.newstatesman.com
'Gavin Jacobson: Let’s start with the mood of discontent in Germany, reflected in the various strikes (rail workers), protests (farmers), and demonstrations (Palestine). How ominous is the hard-right Alternative for Germany (AfD)’s call for a general strike?
Wolfgang Streeck: I haven’t even heard of it, clearly because I don’t regularly read British newspapers, with their typically sober, well-informed, level-headed reporting on Germany. '
amusing opener here.
The AfD invited Martin Sellner to their 'blue sky thinking ' meetingI missed that, in what context?
AfD were talking with Nazis about "the forceful return of migrants, allegedly including those with German citizenship, to their countries of origin through mass deportations"
Another little line I saw today was that AfD is polling in first place in all five of Germany’s eastern states.
no one said there was a general strike, whats interesting is the AdF using that language of the general strike and positioning themselves around this....the coincidence of timing of different strikes is based on underlying economic conditions... the reason any of this is worth talking about is because the AdF have already 'won' east germany and are polling so well across germany as a whole...Don't know what the Guardian thinks is happening in Germany, but…
- There is no "General Strike" at all, except in right-wing fantasies. Literally. There're some embarassing videos on TikTok et al. from Right-Wingers totally shocked realising, that life goes on as usual and the masses didn't rise up as was promised by some other right-wing nuts. It's no new phenomenon, though. They called for example for a "General Strike" against anti-corona-measures as well, with the same result.
- As was already mentioned, the farmer protests are not by farm workers, but by farm owners, especially large ones, partly supported by some (right-wing) truckage and craftsmen companies. These look large and mighty because of their giant machines. But if you look at the numbers, it's rather tiny. Official numbers for their central manifestation in Berlin today are 8500 people with 6000 tractors, after a month of nationwide mobilisation. (In comparison: Yesterday there was an antifascist demonstration against the mass-deportation plans from the AfD, mobilised for about 2 days, with roundabout 25.000 people in Berlin alone, with parallel demonstrations in other cities as well.) The farmers' organization has formally distanced themselves from right-wing bandwagoneers, but symbols of the extreme-right are pretty prevalent on their events, especially in Eastern Germany.
- The train strikes are totally independent and just coincidentally at the same time. They're due, because the last big contract ran out, and they're basically striking for an ordinary wage raise. The Train Drivers Union (GDL) is one of the more combative unions, though. But they're totally not under suspicion to pact with right-wingers. They even postponed the beginning of their strike by two days, probably to not become pocketed by the fascists and their "general strike" bullshit.
"Welcomed" may be a bit strong.Deutshxit
FT interview
Far-right AfD leader vows to campaign for Brexit-style EU exit vote in Germany
Alice Weidel says UK departure is model for her country as party struggles with reaction to exposé about deportation ‘masterplan’www.theguardian.com
i didnt know Germany welcomed over a million Ukrainian refugees
yeah exactly its the normalisation that feels scary here - the video is just a few chumps, but if this is socially acceptable in public like this, thats almost worst than extremist headbangersSylt was taken over by punks a couple of years ago....much more valuable than nazi posho scum.
Fwiw - a true sign of our times who chants 'deutschland den deutschen' these days...used to be reserved to pissed up nazi skins. Being a proper right winger has been normalised across so many layers of society.
From Merkel via AFD to fringes like Gen Identity - they all have their part in it.
'Don't be ashamed of being German and Christian....be proud, show it, don't be afraid of being superior '
Back to the sylt punks
View attachment 425743
The Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution (Bundesamt für Verfassungsschutz, or BfV) owes its existence to the Allies. When the Western powers gave the green light for the creation of the Federal Republic of Germany in their zones of occupation in 1949, they also gave the constituent assembly permission to set up ‘an office to collect and disseminate information on subversive activities against the federal government’. According to Ronen Steinke, the intention was to nip in the bud any attempt at a coup d’état, whether fascist or communist, that would have given the Soviet Union an excuse to invade western Germany. (Instead, the Soviets founded their own German state, the German Democratic Republic.)
In post-fascist Germany, where memories of the Gestapo were still vivid, setting up a domestic intelligence agency for political surveillance was a politically sensitive move. The Allies had already passed a statute in 1946 disbanding ‘any German police bureaux and agencies charged with the surveillance and control of political activities’. Three years later, writing to the constituent assembly, they reiterated that the new agency ‘must not have police powers’.
This injunction is still observed. BfV agents aren’t allowed to arrest people; they don’t wear uniforms or carry guns. ‘They’re meant to listen as inconspicuously as possible,’ Steinke writes, ‘and take notes.’ Their job, as stated in the legislation, is ‘the collection and evaluation of information ... on activities against the free democratic basic order’. Defending the state against threats to this order is the domain of the police and public prosecutors, sometimes acting on information provided by the BfV.
Worth a readThe BfV is subordinate to the Ministry of the Interior, and is therefore subject to political instruction, in a way that, say, the office of the public prosecutor is not. Today, nudged by its masters, it has extended its responsibilities from the observation of subversive activities to their prevention.
Varoufakis is talking shit. What "social democratic-green austerity" is he talking about? I'm way no fan of the Green party, but they where out of government for 17 out of the recent 20 years. It's been the christian democrats, who did the largest part of this austerity thing together with the free (market) democrats and the social democrats in turns. And the problem, why Die Linke got ousted (and probably won't return) is not, that they got "tamed", but that they didn't manage to show any reasonable option to end up getting their policies implemented. You vote for Die Linke, they'll end up in opposition, your vote is lost. That's presumably how voters see it after 30 years of trying.
Maybe Varoufakis trash-talks especially about these parties, because he sides with ex-left turned right-wing Sahra Wagenknecht?
What's your point? I don't negate that the Greens were in government back at the time, although they were in charge of the departments of foreign policy, consumer protection, agriculture and environmental protection, so weren't exactly the driving force, but of course they didn't resist these laws either. But they surely weren't in government for "20 years" as Varoufakis statet, and the notorious German constitutional "debt brake" for example, definitely another foundation of "20 years of austerity" politics, was implemented by christian and social democrats against the Green and Left votes. It's just ridiculous to blame "20 years of austerity" on the Greens, and not on christian democrats or the so-called "liberals".So which government instituted Agenda 2010 and Hartz IV?
My point is that most people in Germany think of Schröder/Fischer if asked about austerity, at least if they're old or informed enough. You seem to be very keen to make excuses for the Greens who were in that government. The SPD, obviously, went on to form the coalition with Merkel and which created the constitutional debt break/Schuldenbremse.What's your point? I don't negate that the Greens were in government back at the time, although they were in charge of the departments of foreign policy, consumer protection, agriculture and environmental protection, so weren't exactly the driving force, but of course they didn't resist these laws either. But they surely weren't in government for "20 years" as Varoufakis statet, and the notorious German constitutional "debt brake" for example, definitely another foundation of "20 years of austerity" politics, was implemented by christian and social democrats against the Green and Left votes. It's just ridiculous to blame "20 years of austerity" on the Greens, and not on christian democrats or the so-called "liberals".
Ironically Sahra Wagenknecht's new party now ran for the EU parliament elections with one of their two front runners, an Ex-SPD member, explicitly defending the Agenda 2010 as "necessary".
Ein Schröder-Jünger für Wagenknecht
Wagenknecht macht mit Thomas Geisel einen strammen Agenda-Anhänger zum Spitzenkandidaten. Ausgerecht zur Europawahl?www.geldfuerdiewelt.de„Nichts kommt von selbst und wenig ist von Dauer“ – Eine Reform-Agenda für die SPD in NRW und Deutschland. Gastbeitrag von Thomas Geisel | Blog der Republik
Am 18. Mai konnte ich ein ganz besonderes Jubiläum feiern: seit 40 Jahren bin ich Mitglied der SPD. Eingetreten bin ich am Tag meines Abiturs. Was hatte mich damals bewogen, SPD-Mitglied zu werden? Zunächst einmal eine familiäre Prägung: Mein Vater war SPD-Landtagsabgeordneter in der...www.blog-der-republik.de
Well, I don't know which majority of Germans you've talked to, but I'm certainly old enough and consider myself sufficiently informed as well. And inside my political bubble, this Agenda 2010 thing is of course tightly connected to Schröder and the SPD. It's not forgotten, that the Greens did nothing to stop or at least mitigate it, but it wasn't their thing. It was a central "social democrat" project, and besides Schröder I'd definitely name people like Clement, Müntefering, Riester or Hartz before Fischer, when asked about it.My point is that most people in Germany think of Schröder/Fischer if asked about austerity, at least if they're old or informed enough.
1) Because while technically not 100% untrue, it certainly bends the truth beyond a point I'm willing to accept unchallenged. He's explicitly talking about a timespan of 20 years, and the Greens had in summary the shortest time in government of all the parties taking part in any governments, even if you go back further. I hadn't objected, if he'd for example said "20 years of austerity regardless under which government" or if he'd named the Greens as one of all the four involved parties, but naming especially social democrats and greens is as if he'd said "Brexit and the rise of far-right parties like UKIP and Reform in the UK is the result of 20 years of Labour neoliberalism" (because Tony Blair did something 20 years ago). Would sound rather odd, right?You seem to be very keen to make excuses for the Greens who were in that government. The SPD, obviously, went on to form the coalition with Merkel and which created the constitutional debt break/Schuldenbremse.
In light of these facts, I'm confused why you are so upset with Varoufakis.
Did I say I had spoken to a majority or Germans? Don't be tedious. The impression is based on many conversations with unemployed and casualised people in greater Berlin over many years. Your mileage may vary in Hamburg given that it is a lot wealthier and historically has a lower level of unemployment .Well, I don't know which majority of Germans you've talked to, but I'm certainly old enough and consider myself sufficiently informed as well. And inside my political bubble, this Agenda 2010 thing is of course tightly connected to Schröder and the SPD. It's not forgotten, that the Greens did nothing to stop or at least mitigate it, but it wasn't their thing. It was a central "social democrat" project, and besides Schröder I'd definitely name people like Clement, Müntefering, Riester or Hartz before Fischer, when asked about it.
The term austerity in fact wasn't very common at the time, but got into widespread use in Germany especially in the EU financial crisis, when it was used to describe what policies the Merkel government and particularly Wolfgang Schäuble imposed onto the Greeks, and later onto themselves with the debt brake etc.
(I just did an experiment and asked a couple of (old and informed enough) friends to name 5 German politicians they associate with the term 'austerity'. I've got 2 answers by now reading "Lindner, Scholz, Merz, Schäuble, Merkel" and "Schäuble, Schäuble, Merkel, Gabriel, Lindner".)
1) Because while technically not 100% untrue, it certainly bends the truth beyond a point I'm willing to accept unchallenged. He's explicitly talking about a timespan of 20 years, and the Greens had in summary the shortest time in government of all the parties taking part in any governments, even if you go back further. I hadn't objected, if he'd for example said "20 years of austerity regardless under which government" or if he'd named the Greens as one of all the four involved parties, but naming especially social democrats and greens is as if he'd said "Brexit and the rise of far-right parties like UKIP and Reform in the UK is the result of 20 years of Labour neoliberalism" (because Tony Blair did something 20 years ago). Would sound rather odd, right?
And 2) because one of the most prolific narratives of right-wing propaganda in Germany right now—regardless of the protagonists inside or outside the democratic range, and including Wagenknecht's new querfront party—is (falsely) blaming the greens for everything not going well today. I don't think Varoufakis is an idiot, so I'm pretty sure he's fully aware of that and does further this alternative reality on purpose.