I wonder what CO2 emissions per passenger mile would be for a modern airship (if there was any used as a passenger ship) for a trip to, say, Paris, compared with a jet airplane, and with land modes of transport.
I've always been amazed at the elevatory powers of lifting gases let alone those of hot air balloons. That air can lift anything at all has always seemed strange to me.
In extreme detail. I also have a thorough understanding of how aerostats work.You know how a wing works..?
I remember reading about that, they were moving into the original airship site at Cardington? I will have a dig around.What happened to that airship outfit In Bedford? That seemed promising for a while but has gone all quiet since they had a couple of bumps.
What happened to that airship outfit In Bedford? That seemed promising for a while but has gone all quiet since they had a couple of bumps.
Moved into Cardington. Brought back the vehicle a previous incarnation of the company had built for the US DoD/Lockheed Martin. Modified it. Flew it a few times, looked awesome by the way. Crashed it. Repaired it, flew it a few more times. Left it out in a squall so it blew over and deployed its auto-deflate mechanism venting god knows how many thousands of pounds worth of helium to the atmosphere. Moved to a serviced office setup in Bedford. Got hit by the Covid lock down, currently running a share issue to keep going.What happened to that airship outfit In Bedford? That seemed promising for a while but has gone all quiet since they had a couple of bumps.
Cardington Shortstown’s R101 was the 'Socialist' airship, the 'Capitalist' airship, the R100 was. built at Howden in Yorkshire and didn't crash... Probably because politicians didn't override the engineers and to push it into 'service' too soon.That's basically the history of airships and Cardington. (I'm from near there - see R101)
Moved into Cardington. Brought back the vehicle a previous incarnation of the company had built for the US DoD/Lockheed Martin. Modified it. Flew it a few times, looked awesome by the way. Crashed it. Repaired it, flew it a few more times. Left it out in a squall so it blew over and deployed its auto-deflate mechanism venting god knows how many thousands of pounds worth of helium to the atmosphere. Moved to a serviced office setup in Bedford. Got hit by the Covid lock down, currently running a share issue to keep going.
I brought £100 of their shares in an issue when they started flying, because I think the Airlander HAV looked cool in the air. I haven't checked but I suspect they are currently worth the price of a book about airships. Paperback.
(I have got a picture of me standing next to it in the shed. It was pretty cool close up too.)
View attachment 214386
The one of me was a publicity picture taken by the event I was at and I can’t find it (yet) but this is one I took. If you look at the bottom you can see a gap between the floor and the bottom of the vehicle as they kept it neutral in the shed for some reason. This meant someone had to be there all the time to fettle the heating and stuff.
I don’t know why they did that, should have asked, as when they flew it it’s buoyancy was trimmed(?) so that it was heavier than air and generated aerodynamic lift in forward flight and also used the thrust of its engines to move it up and down so as not to need a massive ground crew for landing, I think it also had a kind of reverse hovercraft ‘ undercarriage’ that stuck it to the ground whilst it was being tied up. Though that might just have been a plan.
(ETA, sadly we weren’t allowed to punch it to test wether the story that blimps are called blimps because that’s the sound a non rigid airship makes when you punch it is true. Health and safety gone mad...)
How did they get him on the plane?
PIA has a pretty horrendous safety records. Something like 4 fatal crashes in the past decade and numerous more in the last 4 or 5 decades. I wouldn't fly themThere is some interesting information coming out regarding the tragic crash of the Pakistan Airlines flight on 22nd May. It seems that there was an initial attempt to land the plane with the landing gear retracted and the subsequent damage caused to the engines during the belly flop likely caused the eventual crash when it went around and attempted a second landing.
Its all very odd because the pilots do not seem to have informed ATC that they had a problem on the initial landing attempt and there were no emergency vehicles ready and waiting for the attempt at a crash landing. Its my understanding that in a situation when there is landing gear problems you stay airborne and trouble shoot the problem only attempting a belly landing if you run our of options. If this was the last option why was there no warning given and why the go around?
Very early days but it seems to me something went badly wrong in the cockpit. Either they simply didn't lower the landing gear (pretty unthinkable) or more likely had failed to grasp that the landing gear hadn't deployed for some reason.
PIA has a pretty horrendous safety records. Something like 4 fatal crashes in the past decade and numerous more in the last 4 or 5 decades. I wouldn't fly them
"I can't understand the kids' accents Nav, so I suppose that this might be Pembroke Dock."
"I can't understand the kids' accents Nav, so I suppose that this might be Pembroke Dock."