Ok, so, what 1200-1500 dead during this conflict? How many displaced? And internally displaced, cos I can't imagine they are going to refugee camps outside of Palestinian territories.The idf send warnings.
Ok, so, what 1200-1500 dead during this conflict? How many displaced? And internally displaced, cos I can't imagine they are going to refugee camps outside of Palestinian territories.The idf send warnings.
Ok, so, what 1200-1500 dead during this conflict? How many displaced? And internally displaced, cos I can't imagine they are going to refugee camps outside of Palestinian territories.
pour encourager les autresThe Israelis loathe the Palestinians yet are taking steps not to kill as many as they can. With all the fire power they have could easily double that or more. It's not like anyone who matters would care how many Palestinians they kill.
Nothing makes sense to me.
The Israelis loathe the Palestinians yet are taking steps not to kill as many as they can. With all the fire power they have could easily double that or more. It's not like anyone who matters would care how many Palestinians they kill.
Nothing makes sense to me.
I think they do care inasmuch as there may be a calculated 'psychological' line which it is prudent not to cross in terms of casualties in relation to the international reaction that might be expected; perhaps they have miscalculated this time.The Israelis loathe the Palestinians yet are taking steps not to kill as many as they can. With all the fire power they have could easily double that or more. It's not like anyone who matters would care how many Palestinians they kill.
Nothing makes sense to me.
The Israelis loathe the Palestinians yet are taking steps not to kill as many as they can. With all the fire power they have could easily double that or more. It's not like anyone who matters would care how many Palestinians they kill.
Nothing makes sense to me.
Witness: “Israeli soldiers used us as Human shields after shooting my old father in the heart, twice.”
While Israeli soldiers invaded Gaza, the media was exploding with the Israeli induced propaganda which states “Hamas uses Palestinians as Human shields” Who really uses Palestinians as human shields? In this video, a witness that was used as a human shield by Israeli soldiers speaks of his experience. And how he was used as a human shield being placed behind a window while Israeli soldiers were shooting at Gaza’s resistance soldiers right next to him. Making it impossible for resistance in Gaza to shoot back out of fear of shooting their own people. This witness was not only used as a human shield, but witnessed his own father get shot in the heart, twice, after trying to explain that he wants nothing but peace.
The Israelis loathe the Palestinians yet are taking steps not to kill as many as they can. With all the fire power they have could easily double that or more. It's not like anyone who matters would care how many Palestinians they kill.
Nothing makes sense to me.
Wtf? The question isn't really about me, although I've framed it that way for the benefit of my MP. What's the point of citizens of the UK giving money to charities helping Palestinians while arms companies in the UK are allowed to sell weapons that will inevitably cause more death and destruction there? The point isn't really that hard to understand. Basically, what I'm wanting is for the UK to stop arming Israel - at least for a couple of years.
They are, this oppression has similarities to the Warsaw Ghetto.
Yes, I'm well aware of all that, thanks, but Johnny Vodka seems to think that lobbying MPs here (yeah, that's always worked in the past with regard to arms sales, hasn't it?) is preferable to actually practically helping out the people in Gaza right here and now. And even if there was an arms embargo in the short term (which there won't be), how is that meant to help out Gazans in need of medical attention today? Or food and shelter?
I wonder what would happen if a large, powerful country - somewhere like France, perhaps - were to decide they were going to break the blockade and ship supplies to Gaza. I guess Israel's strategy relies on everyone seeing them as the "mad dog" that'd bite anyone, but would they really risk the reaction to, for example, attacking a French warship?I don't suppose it will have an Immediate military effect, but it does send an important message, not just to Israel but to the international community at large. It would send a big message and put extra pressure on other countries to do the same. Not the USA of course but I believe that the supply of arms of to a state that clearly has a case to answer for war crimes is a step in the right direction.
Immediate relief efforts are virtually impossible to a population that is blockaded from land, sea and air. If you've got some positive suggestions on how this can be done then share them.
Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa has decided to cancel his visit to Israel, where he had planned meetings with government officials, including Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, teleSUR English said on August 6.
Correa cancelled the visit in protest against the atrocities being committed by Israeli forces against the people of Gaza.
During a radio interview, Correa accused Israel of "genocide". He referred to the fact that the Israeli Defense Forces had killed more than 1880 Palestinians in less than a month, mostly civilians, including at least 430 children.
"Ecuador was the first South American country to withdraw its ambassador from Israel and we must continue denouncing this genocide," Correa said. "We have obviously canceled our trip after these events."
Two days early, Ecuador announced it would open an embassy in Palestine, for which a diplomatic delegation is already in Ramallah.
Meanwhile, Uruguay has announced it will join Ecuador, as well as Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Peru and Venezuela, in opening an embassy in Palestine, teleSUR English said on August 8.
Uruguayan ambassador Enrique Ribeiro will travel to Ramallah in the West bank to open the new embassy.
Bolivian Leader among a list of recognized names including former Honduran president Mel Zelaya and Nobel peace prize winner Adolfo Pérez Esquivel calling for support to the Boycott Divestment Sanctions (BDS) campaign against Israel.
Bolivian President Evo Morales has officially signed on as a supporter of the Boycott Divestment Sanctions (BDS) campaign against Israel.
In an open letter released yesterday, Morales heads a long list of signatories from Latin America and elsewhere condemning "apartheid and genocide" against Palestinians, and calls on Israel to respect United Nations resolutions. Among those listed as signatories include former President of Honduras Mel Zelaya, Nobel peace prize winner Adolfo Pérez Esquivel, Uruguayan author Eduardo Galeano, Cuban musician Silvio Rodríguez and teleSUR President Patricia Villegas (see full letter below).
(actually, I'm not sure where France stands on the whole Israel/Palestine thing, but they're not a NATO member AFAIK. Isn't it a shame that one of the most solid international consensuses there is seems to revolve around supporting Israel?)
I wonder what would happen if a large, powerful country - somewhere like France, perhaps - were to decide they were going to break the blockade and ship supplies to Gaza. I guess Israel's strategy relies on everyone seeing them as the "mad dog" that'd bite anyone, but would they really risk the reaction to, for example, attacking a French warship?
(actually, I'm not sure where France stands on the whole Israel/Palestine thing, but they're not a NATO member AFAIK. Isn't it a shame that one of the most solid international consensuses there is seems to revolve around supporting Israel?)
Evidence Emerges of Israeli “Shoot To Cripple” Policy In the Occupied West BankMost disturbing about the killing was how familiar scenes like it had become. According to Abukhalil, the Israeli army has exhibited a clear pattern of either shooting to kill or shooting to cripple over the past six months. Rather than disperse protests with traditional means like teargas and rubber coated metal bullets, the army has begun firing at protesters’ knees, femurs, or aiming for their vital organs.
Like the army’s old policy of breaking the arms of young stone throwers to deter protests during the First Intifada, the new tactic suggests an attempt to winnow out the ranks of demonstrators by shattering their legs. By eroding the front line of protests through brute force, Israel’s military is apparently trying to undermine the capacity of Palestinian society to mount an effective new Intifada.
You're probably right, though things did change a lot with de Gaulle - I think France's assertively pro-Israel stance was of its time, and temporary.I don't know the answer to that either, but I do know that France gave Israel it's nuclear weapons capability. So I doubt they'd be the ones to try and break the blockade.
The French state is still very pro-Israeli state and doesn't hesitate to prosecute/persecute people for publishing criticisms. And of course, their more aggressive historical stance (Nuclear weapons) has set the absolute context for the entire region - not just Israel.You're probably right, though things did change a lot with de Gaulle - I think France's assertively pro-Israel stance was of its time, and temporary.
What a very neat international consensus Israel does benefit from.The French state is still very pro-Israeli state and doesn't hesitate to prosecute/persecute people for publishing criticisms. And of course, the more aggressive historical stance (Nuclear weapons) has set the absolute context for the entire region - not just Israel.