this is the key question. We'll see.
But as recent history shows, it's Thatcherite economics. Those of the sort that created the conditions for the Tories to wiggle back in with a hard right agenda.
this is the key question. We'll see.
You must say vote labour.
You pathetic shil - is this all you have, vote labour, we're not the tories? You have no idea.
Wasn't that one of Denis Healey's? It's what he called Thatcher's economic policy in her first term isn't it?
So you'dSo you'd be happy if someone stood in Sheffield Hallam and helped Clegg keep his seat?
Well there are forces in Labour that want that to prevail on that basis. But others want them to present an alternative, including their main donors. It's an open question how this works itself out.But as recent history shows, it's Thatcherite economics. Those of the sort that created the conditions for the Tories to wiggle back in with a hard right agenda.
So did last night's result please you, then? If not, why not?a) as I've already said i'm *not* voting Labour at the GLA elections and
b) I'm saying that it's critical to shift Labour into some form of opposition to neoliberalism,
Well there are forces in Labour that want that to prevail. But others want them to present an alternative, including their main donors. It's an open question how this works itself out.
By telling people to vote labour anything else might be bad.tta) as I've already said i'm *not* voting Labour at the GLA elections and
b) I'm saying that it's critical to shift Labour into some form of opposition to neoliberalism,
I want everything to be different and sweet. I will fight for that.Well there are forces in Labour that want that to prevail on that basis. But others want them to present an alternative, including their main donors. It's an open question how this works itself out.
So did last night's result please you, then? If not, why not?
newsnight might be worth watching tonight
i presume they'll lead with it
Shift, you can't shift labour. You clueless cunt.
The labour party shifting into opposing neo-liberalism. What fucking mental bat-shit world do you live in?articul8 said:it's critical to shift Labour into some form of opposition to neoliberalism,
The proposed amalgamation between TSSA and the RMT collapsed. Why? It would have put more boots on the ground. It would have made a stronger union.
Reason: RMT general sec is Bob Crow. TSSA general sec is Articul8.
Maybe you clueless few, with no influence can turn the ship. Fantasist. Trot,Has this always been true? On every level or just the national leadership? Whose to say what is or isn't possible given the kind of period we're living through?
Labour shifted from being a social democratic party to being a neoliberal one. Why is it unthinkable that they could move in the opposite direction?The labour party shifting into opposing neo-liberalism. What fucking mental bat-shit world dol you live in?
The labour party shifting into opposing neo-liberalism. What fucking mental bat-shit world dol you live in?
I wonder how long it will be before the remnants of the EDL, etc make another visit to Bradford?
Maybe you clueless few, with no influence can turn the ship. Fantasist. Trot,
It's not hard is it?
They're a neo-liberal party. They'd be opposing themselves.
Ha - not guilty. There is a different between industrial and political strategy. I hope there is a UNITE/PCS merger.
Some hool-lit.And your alternative is...? A running club in Oxford? Chances of a bronze medal (negligible)
I don't mean to belittle the IWCA - but you're so fucking sure you've got the answers (without anything to back it up) it's hard not to have a pop in return.Some hool-lit.
Fucking joker. Sort yourself out. You're an embarrassment.
You haven't had a pop.I don't mean to belittle the IWCA - but you're so fucking sure you've got the answers (without anything to back it up) it's hard not to have a pop in return.