And in this evening's news...
Nice to know that the investigation is to be carried out by the utterly impartial City of London police. English justice is secure; I shall sleep safe in my bed tonight.
Do you not see the difference between what actually happened and being "pelted with bottles", with the implicit suggestion that it impeded efforts? Must it just be 'yes' or 'no' to you, is it that simple? Is your world so black and white?
Oh, wait... Evenin' Officer.
The Independent Police Complaints Commission was being notified last night. Scotland Yard said the alarm had been raised by a member of the public who spoke to a police officer on a cordon at the junction of Birchin Lane and Cornhill in the City.
He sent two medics through the cordon line and into nearby St Michael's Alley where they found a man who had stopped breathing. They called for ambulance support at about 7.30pm and moved him back behind the cordon where they gave him cardio-pulmonary resuscitation.
"The officers took the decision to move him as during this time a number of missiles – believed to be bottles – were being thrown at them", said a police statement. The ambulance service took the man to hospital where he died.
A London ambulance spokesman said: "Our staff immediately took over the treatment of the patient and made extensive efforts to resuscitate him both at the scene and on the way to hospital."
"The officers took the decision to move him as during this time a number of missiles – believed to be bottles – were being thrown at them"
Sorry, your "The police LIED when they said bottles were thrown. Only some bottles were thrown" stance is confusing.
No it isn't, the picture of him walking is taken moments later.The point I was making is that that is the only picture in the public domain of him at the location
None of them are strictly speaking riot police, some are Level Two 'scuffle' police, some are FIT and some are dog handlers.(and they arent all riot police - notice the (possibly dog) cop on the right who appears to have his hands in his pockets and a flat cap on).
Seriously!?!
"A number of" two plastic bottles. That missed. And the idiots were stopped by protesters. These fit, armoured men, they moved a critically ill man for that?
The ambulances were held up by the BTP line which was by then at the junction of Cornhill and Bishopsgate, next to David Clulow opticians, as shown on 'davehighbury'sDid the ambulance actually get stuck at police lines - as the collapse took place outside the cordon)?
Isn't the public order medic course a whole two days, hardly 'paramedics'.Its entirely possible that the officers have more paramedic training and experience than the dispatcher did
Isn't the public order medic course a whole two days, hardly 'paramedics'.
Hurrah for the bold text! At least we now get you using the actual statement for criticism, rather than the one you got all het up about.
As for whether or not, or why, he was moved - there could be a number of reasons for it. Were you there?
apologies, I'd missed that earlier post about this.Plus several days ELS training that everyone does, and possibly more than that (given that the photo of Tomlinson being treated shows a Sgt treating him, who one imagines will have had the bit extra of ELS training that custody sgts get). Anyway, my point was not that they were paramedics, but rather that they might well have known more about CPR than the LAS operator did.
apologies, I'd missed that earlier post about this.
my point wasn't that the LAS operator might have known more about CPR than the police medics, it was that the LAS operator was more than likely wanting to get advice from the police on the ground about the best route for the ambulance to take, as well as comfirming that they had made any police lines aware that the ambulance was coming through, and where to direct it.
Thinking about it now though, I suppose it's quite likely that the police control room had also requested an ambulance be sent seperately and was liasing with a different dispatcher, which may explain why the police didn't think it necessary to take the phone... I still think it'd have been good practice for them to have spoken with the dispatcher who was sending the ambulance in response to the call from the public, as it's quite possible that ambulance was dispatched before the other one, and could therefore have been at the scene faster.
Perhaps, though its worth pointing out that its very questionable whether any of the officers who went to Tomlinson's aid would have known about the best way into that area for the LAS. Usually the only people who would would be in the control room, in this case GT (or as Sky insisted upon calling it, Gold Control) who should have told LAS the best route and advised those units on cordons that an ambulance was on the way.
one was a baby that died of natural causes, the other was a man who all the evidence is pointing to having died as a direct result of police actions.
I hope you're not suggesting we should be campaigning to illiminate death entirely? I think that'd be a tad unrealistic a demand even for me and enumbers
In a time honoured tactic, and one that they seem to get away with time after time (see: Hillsborough, Mayday 'attempted murder' etc etc).I think the main issue is media manipulation here. The initial 'police source' PR statements seem calculated to mislead the public about what was happening and to portray the demonstrators in an extremely unfavourable light, while portraying the cops in a favourable one.
Why have you edited your original post?
Anyway I was going to ask you why you're taking the moral highground in this particular instance when you seem to hold human life in such low regard as is highlighted in this post
http://www.urban75.net/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=8804099&postcount=93
In a time honoured tactic, and one that they seem to get away with time after time (see: Hillsborough, Mayday 'attempted murder' etc etc).
I've had my fair share of disagreements with mr enumbers, so I'll not be defending every post he's written on here if that's ok with you.In his unedited post enumbers was speaking of having respect for the dead yet he clearly has none.
fact is though that you're now acting as an apologist for the police in a situation where their brutality at a demonstration has led to the death of someone who by all accounts was just an innocent bystander who was just trying to get home. I think you need to seriously consider whether that's a position you're comfortable with holding.
I just can't help but think if it hadn't been for the likes of enumbers and a small following of knuckle scrapers who think it's there god given right to be violent in public that this bloke may well not be dead.
:
"Anarchy" is not a dictionary definition meaning "chaos", bollockhead
I find it hard to understand why agricola and badco would want to try so hard to create hypothetical scenarios in which the police story could be true.