brogdale
Coming to terms with late onset Anarchism
People were not attacked, were they? Why do you want to pretend they were?OK wrong on the windows being broken... but still a group throwing paint, throwing a smoke grenade in the door.
People were not attacked, were they? Why do you want to pretend they were?OK wrong on the windows being broken... but still a group throwing paint, throwing a smoke grenade in the door.
we only seem to have the cereal cafe owner's claims to go on that it was packed with customers and kids, which seems strange because the paint incident happened an hour after they say they close on their website. More likely they had a couple of mates round having a drink.
"Cafe"?This wanton attack on a cafe is so much more violent and harmful than gentrification is on communities.
"Cafe"?
Isn't essentially a shop space in which packets of shop-bought cereal are opened into bowls and milk added?
People were not attacked, were they? Why do you want to pretend they were?
OK wrong on the windows being broken... but still a group throwing paint, throwing a smoke grenade in the door.
they were... a whole cafe was attacked with paint and smoke bombs... sure no windows were broken but it was still attacked
so some very mild property damage that caused no lasting damage, and a few uncomfortable, but hardly terrified adults, with any children presumably downstairs and so not seeing what happened.
Fuck off.
Some business-owners' property was superficially damaged.they were... a whole cafe was attacked
Some business-owners' property was superficially damaged.
People were not attacked; why do you desperately seek to pretend otherwise? What's your agenda here?
great argument...
People were not assaulted, they group of people in the cafe were attacked... no agenda, you're just desperate to argue over semantics...
erm ok...Hide under your table.
so a fun night out for all, everyone fine with that sort of thing... just go attacking random shops/cafes containing people who look like the sort of people we don't like
it wasn't random was it? it was a measured protest against a successful business which is symbolic of gentrification in the area - gentrification that is destroying people's lives. hopefully despite their bluster it made the business owners feel uncomfortable, even better it might discourage others, most importantly of all it has raised the debate about gentrification to a new level and exposed the dishonesty and vile attitudes of some of the gentrifiers, like the Ripper Museum
People were not assaulted, they group of people in the cafe were attacked... no agenda, you're just desperate to argue over semantics...
no I just think that attacking a novelty cafe full of students and 'hipsters' is really stupid and unhelpful... and yes attacking people who sort of fit the stereotype of the people you think are to blame for some issue is the sort of thing right wing thugs do
Yes, you've done this bit before. It was a crap argument then, it is again.
so I guess I'm done with this topic
Semantics? No, you said this...
..which was/is factually incorrect.
Try and find the good grace to admit such, eh?
it was hardly 'measured' - attacking a small business because they're 'hipsters' is using the same sort of logic far right groups use
But you're not though are you?!
hammer and tongs for a dozen pages or so and you haven't even got the basics of the incident you have railed against.OK wrong on the windows being broken.
You repeat it, but people were not attacked. What part of that do you find so difficult to comprehend?yes I said attacked which I also mentioned again in the post re: semantics...
You repeat it, but people were not attacked. What part of that do you find so difficult to comprehend?