Fred Goodwin tried to hide relationship

[AKA pseudonym]

Due to Parliamentary disclosure it can now be publicly revealed...

I thought it was gonna be something interesting...

 

[Kanda]

Where has it been said it was a gay relationship?

I thought they just said: a relationship with a senior colleague.

It is interesting, cos the FSA would want to know but the injunction prohibits that.

 

[AKA pseudonym]

Where has it been said it was a gay relationship?

I thought they just said: a relationship with a senior colleague.

It is interesting, cos the FSA would want to know but the injunction prohibits that.

I changed the title... as that part may not be revealed yet

 

[Kanda]

I changed the title... as that part may not be revealed yet

Or true?

 

[MellySingsDoom]

The Graun is reporting that the "other half" was a woman...

 

[Badgers]

 

[Kanda]

Graun:

Mr Justice Tugendhat varied the injunction to allow publication of Goodwin's name, but not details of the alleged relationship and the name of the woman said to be involved.

 

[Gingerman]

Wasn't just screwing the country then?

 

[Streathamite]

Where has it been said it was a gay relationship?

I thought they just said: a relationship with a senior colleague.

If the "colleague" is 'senior', then it's much more likely to be a gay relationship than a hetero one, anyway

 

[Kanda]

If the "colleague" is 'senior', then it's much more likely to be a gay relationship than a hetero one, anyway

Keep reading down the thread...

 

[danny la rouge]

Edited: I had linked to a Daily Mail story without comment. I've changed my mind.

 

[Open Sauce]

If the "colleague" is 'senior', then it's much more likely to be a gay relationship than a hetero one, anyway

Or HR

 

[stavros]

Due to Parliamentary disclosure it can now be publicly revealed...

Is there anything to stop an MP or a Lord just reading out a list of those who've taking out an injunction using parliamentary priviliges?

 

[redsquirrel]

Is there anything to stop an MP or a Lord just reading out a list of those who've taking out an injunction using parliamentary priviliges?

The speaker - last time someone tried that they were pulled aside

 

[big eejit]

[/url]

 

[stavros]

The speaker - last time someone tried that they were pulled aside

Same with the Lords? Ultimately, they're accountable to nobody.

 

[redsquirrel]

There's a Lord Speaker (I think they're called that)

 

[AKA pseudonym]

Is there anything to stop an MP or a Lord just reading out a list of those who've taking out an injunction using parliamentary priviliges?

I don't think there is due to 'privilege'.... I remember Unionist politicians naming innocent people as members of proscribed orgs in Ireland with no repercussions... other than their subsequent executions by loyalist/state bullets...