Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Frankfurt School: In our time

Mao had barely even read Marx. The Chinese Communist Party were more influenced by Stalin's "History of the Bolsheviks" than by Marxist theory itself, which had little relevance to agrarian China in the early 1900s. It was the Soviet Union's rapid industrialisation under a planned economy and Lenin's theory of imperialism which had resonance with Chinese intellectuals.
This is a bit of a myth I think, though he became a communist before he had the chance to read much of the original. Then Wang Yanan and Guo Dali translated Capital in the late thirties and there's a copy with Mao's reading notes on it. It's notable that his early forties essay On New Democracy is probably as close to something more orthodox on political economy before he starts waltzing off down his own road again afterwards, and the influence of the Soviet model overshadows everything.
 
This is a bit of a myth I think, though he became a communist before he had the chance to read much of the original. Then Wang Yanan and Guo Dali translated Capital in the late thirties and there's a copy with Mao's reading notes on it. It's notable that his early forties essay On New Democracy is probably as close to something more orthodox on political economy before he starts waltzing off down his own road again afterwards, and the influence of the Soviet model overshadows everything.
I'm sure he read some Marx, but from what I've read by Mao he doesn't come across as someone who was heavily steeped in Marxist theory and doctrine - my point is that the success of the Soviet model in rapidly industrialising the country (and Stalin's more digestible and less theoretical account of that) was more influential than Marxist theory itself.
 
I'm sure he read some Marx, but from what I've read by Mao he doesn't come across as someone who was heavily steeped in Marxist theory and doctrine - my point is that the success of the Soviet model in rapidly industrialising the country (and Stalin's more digestible and less theoretical account of that) was more influential than Marxist theory itself.
That's only a comparatively brief and later turn that is then again abandoned though. Earlier he went against Marxist orthodoxy by substituting the peasantry for the proletariat, and there was a fair bit of thought went into that (Wang Ya'nan also wrote a fair amount on it and was in senior posts down in Fujian), then you get the pro-Soviet period when the aid was coming in and there was the push to industrialise, then there's the break and it's back to the people's communes with mixed industry and farming.
All a bit beside our point I realise and certainly don't think he picked up much from the Frankfurt School or other Western Marxist currents, more just wanted to emphasize that there was quite a lot of debate around core Marxist ideas in the relative freedom prior to them winning the civil war. With Mao and his "applying it to Chinese realities" my sense is it's both what it says on its face and him thinking he knew best, then no-one to stop him in his latter years.
 
just been watching the (very good) BBC doc on disco - how it came out of the New York Gay scene and brought together gay culture, black culutre and feminsim and its legacy of the mainstreaming of outsider indentities where its ok to be black, trans, gay a women or whatever you want. In terms of wokeness and "culture war" demonology - disco is clearly one of the big bads. Interstingly it did not pick up on how it was all down to Adorno and Horkhimer and their fellow jews academics plotting away, distibuting their pamflets at stonewall and giving lectures at studio 54 on marxist beatmatching. Its almost like their ideas had absolutely fuck all to do with it.
 
Last edited:
I have a theory about Marxist thought that it’s kind of inherent within human belief and outlook and action and precedes Marx by eons. And the same with conservatism. Writers might flesh it out and inspire but both outlooks are prior.
 
just been watching the (very good) BBC doc on disco - how it came out of the New York Gay scene and brought together gay culture, black culutre and feminsim and its legacy of the mainstreaming of outsider indentities where its ok to be black, trans, gay a women or whatever you want. In terms of wokeness and "culture war" demonology - disco is clearly one of the big bads. Interstingly it did not pick up on how it was all down to Adorno and Horkhimer and their fellow jews academics plotting away, distibuting their pamflets at stonewall and giving lectures at studio 54 on marxist beatmatching. Its almost like their ideas had absolutely fuck all to do with it.
I remember Glitter Up the Dark by Sasha Geffen being pretty good on disco and house.
 
I'm sure he read some Marx, but from what I've read by Mao he doesn't come across as someone who was heavily steeped in Marxist theory and doctrine - my point is that the success of the Soviet model in rapidly industrialising the country (and Stalin's more digestible and less theoretical account of that) was more influential than Marxist theory itself.

He did make some kind of attempt to reconcile Marx with classical Chinese philosophy, the yin and yang as dialectical contradiction and that sort of thing. But I agree with you--he didn't know what he was talking about.
 
just been watching the (very good) BBC doc on disco - how it came out of the New York Gay scene and brought together gay culture, black culutre and feminsim and its legacy of the mainstreaming of outsider indentities where its ok to be black, trans, gay a women or whatever you want. In terms of wokeness and "culture war" demonology - disco is clearly one of the big bads. Interstingly it did not pick up on how it was all down to Adorno and Horkhimer and their fellow jews academics plotting away, distibuting their pamflets at stonewall and giving lectures at studio 54 on marxist beatmatching. Its almost like their ideas had absolutely fuck all to do with it.

The "Disco Sucks" movement is fascinating too. There was a famous, organized anti-disco riot in Chicago, and numerous smaller affrays throughout the country. These days it's totally obvious that it was an orgy of racism and homophobia, but no-one seemed to notice (or care) in the 70s.
 
I have a theory about Marxist thought that it’s kind of inherent within human belief and outlook and action and precedes Marx by eons. And the same with conservatism. Writers might flesh it out and inspire but both outlooks are prior.

Can you explain what you mean by this?
 
you pound shop Ezra?

I know I'm going to regret asking, but I can't help myself. What did you mean by this? Were you trying to be anti-semitic? At first I thought you were, and I was so traumatized I had to withdraw to my safe space (McGillicudy's Lounge), but now I reckon you were thinking of Ezra Pound. That doesn't really help much though. Can you tell us what you were thinking?
 
I know I'm going to regret asking, but I can't help myself. What did you mean by this? Were you trying to be anti-semitic? At first I thought you were, and I was so traumatized I had to withdraw to my safe space (McGillicudy's Lounge), but now I reckon you were thinking of Ezra Pound. That doesn't really help much though. Can you tell us what you were thinking?
His use of the word "ursury", his pretending not to be antisemitic, etc. He came across as a narcissistic troll.

He did have the poems, though.

What do you have?
 
If it actually took you two days to work out that "Pound shop Ezra" might be a reference to Ezra Pound, then all those youtube videos you've been watching, or possibly not watching but then sharing anyway, have seriously rotted your brains. It's not exactly cryptic crosswod stuff.
 
If it actually took you two days to work out that "Pound shop Ezra" might be a reference to Ezra Pound, then all those youtube videos you've been watching, or possibly not watching but then sharing anyway, have seriously rotted your brains. It's not exactly cryptic crosswod stuff.

Tbh I did not believe him capable of making a literary pun. I stand corrected, that's actually not bad at all. I'm going to steal it.
 
I thought this was a quite readable intro to it all:

One of the more memorable things I read this year and it doesn't pull any punches with some of them being brillianrt but also arseholes.
Got this for Xmas, cheers for the recommendation, very accessible so far and still relevant.
 
Back
Top Bottom