One then . Vs. many, many socialist alliance type candidates with next to fuck all.Blanau Gwent?
This is certainly true, I've no argument against it being really damaging to local party morale etc - and in a tight race it might be enough to tip the balance to the Tories winning. But that's a long way from an independent labour candidate actually winning - especially at a moment when national politics are so torrid.Whilst true that examples of independents winning are thin on the ground, local parties are often suffering the effects for years after. If you begin a campaign with the letter droppers and door knockers resigning en masse, you're not looking at a united front.
This is certainly true, I've no argument against it being really damaging to local party morale etc - and in a tight race it might be enough to tip the balance to the Tories winning. But that's a long way from an independent labour candidate actually winning - especially at a moment when national politics are so torrid.
Which is why the right went full scorched-earth to take control back, and are now doing everything in their power - including imposing candidates on local parties - to make sure the left never have a significant role in leading the party again.Yeah definitely. I think a better comparison is probably the Tinge group (or whatever they actually ended up calling themselves) and all the feverish Guardian-led speculation about new centrist parties etc when Corbyn was leader. It was obvious they were going to get crushed which they duly did, but it cuts both ways doesn't it.
I'm guessing here, but I would think a disgruntled independent running in the way you mention is more likely to undermine the imposed candidate so that another party's candidate sneaks through, rather than actually winning themselves.er, the imposition of an unwanted central candidate on locals versus a popular candidate with a high profile locally never ends well for the central party. That's the whole point.
This. I think Labour will win, but the selection shite is a gift to the Tories. Bad press for Labour, sniping and comments relayed to the media from local activists, something the Tories can put in their leaflets. How bad it is probably depends on how far the old Exec want to push it. Legal challenges? Risking starmer suspending them? I doubt that will happen, but it's a story that dominates the first part of the campaign, at least. Even with that div starmer in power, this could have been a loud, confident, Labour regains the red wall campaign. Instead they'll be on the backfoot.Whilst true that examples of independents winning are thin on the ground, local parties are often suffering the effects for years after. If you begin a campaign with the letter droppers and door knockers resigning en masse, you're not looking at a united front.
They've clearly decided visibly disciplining the left in the party is a vote winner overall. The grown ups are back in charge etc.This. I think Labour will win, but the selection shite is a gift to the Tories. Bad press for Labour, sniping and comments relayed to the media from local activists, something the Tories can put in their leaflets. How bad it is probably depends on how far the old Exec want to push it. Legal challenges? Risking starmer suspending them? I doubt that will happen, but it's a story that dominates the first part of the campaign, at least. Even with that div starmer in power, this could have been a loud, confident, Labour regains the red wall campaign. Instead they'll be on the backfoot.
Without (obviously) agreeing with that strategy, even from their point of view, there are places and times to do it. Playing it out as a central v local battle in a by election seems particularly foolish.They've clearly decided visibly disciplining the left in the party is a vote winner overall. The grown ups are back in charge etc.
I'm not sure - how else do you demonstrate to the electorate that there's new management in charge except through things like this? It's likely they'll take Wakefield back either way, but if they can do that and crush the left at the same time, it's probably worth the risk of not doing (from their POV)Without (obviously) agreeing with that strategy, even from their point of view, there are places and times to do it. Playing it out as a central v local battle in a by election seems particularly foolish.
Peter Law was an AM rather than a councillor, which along with the other notable examples does suggest you need to be more of a prominent figure to pull it off.Blanau Gwent?
Don't get me wrong I totally agree with your point.One then . Vs. many, many socialist alliance type candidates with next to fuck all.
A memorable day for a vote that
Galloway: hold my beerMust be so difficult for him that the two byelections have been scheduled for the same date. Can only pick one for the grift run.
Must be so difficult for him that the two byelections have been scheduled for the same date. Can only pick one for the grift run.
Galloway: hold my beer
22 Candidate not to stand in more than one constituency
In Schedule 1 to the 1983 Act (parliamentary elections rules), in rule 8(3)
(candidate’s consent to nomination), after paragraph (b) insert—
“(c) shall state that he is not a candidate at an election for any otherc onstituency the poll for which is to be held on the same day as that for the election to which the consent relates,”.
Surprised Galloway hasn't complained about that alreadySection 22 of the Electoral Administration Act forbids it
So, out in the new year, then?He's been jailed for 18 months.
Vermin setting a low bar for crank parties
Ah you beat me to it. Was just gonna post that.