Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Footballer Marcus Rashford fights for free school meals

It's not about his consistency, it's about ours:
If you're cool with some people being millionaires and landlords, fair enough, that's up to you, but for those of us who aren't, to be consistent we can't give him a pass on those because of all the good stuff he has done. It can't be "alright when Marcus does it" because we like him.
It's not a case of 'liking' him - it's about his incredible achievements in improving the lives of millions of people in poverty. That's what matters to me, and not whether he can match up or be put down for his failure to achieve a high enough standard in some unspecified 'consistency' index which I doubt he gives a fuck about or all the people he's helping.

And I can't believe we're all dancing to the fucking Daily Mail's tune here.
 
He could be a landlord charging peppercorn rent to his family or mates. Would that still make him a cunt landlord?
(Question not at you Badgers )
Personally, I'd feel that would certainly be preferable.

I honestly don't see what's so controversial? I think buy-to-let landlords are a problem in society, so if someone becomes one, I'm not a fan.

If it makes any difference, one of my mates is a buy-to-let landlord. He knows how I feel about it, but we still hang out. Me saying "I wouldn't agree with Marcus Rashford being a BTL landlord" does not mean I think anything else he does is meaningless, nor that it makes him a hideous human being.
 
Rashford has clearly been adopted as ‘one of us’ thereby meaning even when he’s wrong it can be dissembled that he’s right (‘maybe he’s got the houses for the family’ or ‘maybe he’s giving them away to the less fortunate’ type of speculation) or worse that millionaires are inevitable and we should just accept it and how they spend their money to accumulate even more.

Attack the corrupt stinking “business” that is football, after all it’s that in itself that makes working class kids like Rashford rich. Shame I was shit at football.
 
At 23 he's probably still working out his politics given that he's been a bit distracted by being a world class player playing at the highest level. Thank fuck he didn't have to face a load of older people banging on about consistency when he first thought he could do something to help.
 
Rashford. I have no opinion on the matter, but don’t know why people are speculating baselessly when he has been explicit about why he’s bought a few houses
He said to rent to private tenants on AST contracts at market rate or above?
 
That's what matters to me, and not whether he can match up or be put down for his failure to achieve a high enough standard in some unspecified 'consistency' index which I doubt he gives a fuck about or all the people he's helping.
Are you wilfully misunderstanding the point about consistency? Once again: it's not about Rashford being consistent, it's about me be consistent in my values. I don't think people should be BTL landlords, so if someone is one, I'm going to disagree with it. That's. All.

And I can't believe we're all dancing to the fucking Daily Mail's tune here.
What tune is that? I couldn't give a fuck what the Mail thinks about diddly squat, again, it's what I think about a given set of facts. I don't like BTL landlords, so if it turns out Rashford has become one, that'll be disappointing. If it turns out he hasn't, then that's ok too.
YOU DON'T EVEN KNOW IF HE IS ONE.
Nope, and as such I don't believe I've directly criticised him for it? I raised the issue of him being a multi-millionaire as something that many on urban would have a problem with (again, didn't think it would be that controversial) as an example of something we've all been dealing with while (frequently) praising all that he's done. Then, because that's where the conversation went, said the same thing about the BTL issue as well, if it were true.

<edit: Whether he is or isn't now a BTL isn't really the case I'm arguing for/against; it's simply the idea that if he were, then somehow we couldn't comment negatively about that.>
 
What tune is that? I couldn't give a fuck what the Mail thinks about diddly squat, again, it's what I think about a given set of facts. I don't like BTL landlords, so if it turns out Rashford has become one, that'll be disappointing. If it turns out he hasn't, then that's ok too.
If the Mail hadn't posted that shitty article we wouldn't be having this entirely speculative discussion.
 
He said he’d bought the properties as an investment. It’s even on this thread ffs. Don’t think that’s a reason to hang him or owt though
Like my signed Bowie albums?

If I purchased five properties and let refugees live in them rent free for 20 years I would still get a return.

Premium bonds are an investment. Does not make the buyers hedge fund managers.
 
He said he’d bought the properties as an investment. It’s even on this thread ffs. Don’t think that’s a reason to hang him or owt though
How many properties are there in London bought by Chinese or Russians as an investment but wastefully remain empty? Better to rent them out on low rent than leave them empty.
 
Not sure what difference that makes.
Personally, if he were buying them for his family to live in, I'd have no problem with that*. I believe homes should be bought to live in, not to rent or sell for profit.



*and before anyone disingenuously tries to make the point: no, I do not think Marcus Rashford gives one tiny fuck about what I or any of the rest of us think about his purchases, and nor should he. If urban only consisted of comments we thought would matter to their subjects then it would be a far quieter place.
 
Scum link but:
Please don't link to that rag. It is beneath you and even beneath the Daily Wail.

Anyone quoting the S*n or the Wail can get off their high horse and fuck off
 
They increase in value, hence are an investment
Ah right. I assumed (rightly) that buying a house as an investment meant you’d generate income from letting it. Bit of a gamble to think you might be able to sell it for profit
 
Back
Top Bottom