Depends what the Daily Wail says it isHe could be a landlord charging peppercorn rent to his family or mates. Would that still make him a cunt landlord?
(Question not at you Badgers )
Depends what the Daily Wail says it isHe could be a landlord charging peppercorn rent to his family or mates. Would that still make him a cunt landlord?
(Question not at you Badgers )
Well I am not going to read it to find out.Depends what the Daily Wail says it is
It's not a case of 'liking' him - it's about his incredible achievements in improving the lives of millions of people in poverty. That's what matters to me, and not whether he can match up or be put down for his failure to achieve a high enough standard in some unspecified 'consistency' index which I doubt he gives a fuck about or all the people he's helping.It's not about his consistency, it's about ours:
If you're cool with some people being millionaires and landlords, fair enough, that's up to you, but for those of us who aren't, to be consistent we can't give him a pass on those because of all the good stuff he has done. It can't be "alright when Marcus does it" because we like him.
Personally, I'd feel that would certainly be preferable.He could be a landlord charging peppercorn rent to his family or mates. Would that still make him a cunt landlord?
(Question not at you Badgers )
Rashford has clearly been adopted as ‘one of us’ thereby meaning even when he’s wrong it can be dissembled that he’s right (‘maybe he’s got the houses for the family’ or ‘maybe he’s giving them away to the less fortunate’ type of speculation) or worse that millionaires are inevitable and we should just accept it and how they spend their money to accumulate even more.
YOU DON'T EVEN KNOW IF HE IS ONE.I honestly don't see what's so controversial? I think buy-to-let landlords are a problem in society, so if someone becomes one, I'm not a fan.
He did say so tbf.YOU DON'T EVEN KNOW IF HE IS ONE.
Who?He did say so tbf.
And I can't believe we're all dancing to the fucking Daily Mail's tune here.
Rashford. I have no opinion on the matter, but don’t know why people are speculating baselessly when he has been explicit about why he’s bought a few housesWho?
He said to rent to private tenants on AST contracts at market rate or above?Rashford. I have no opinion on the matter, but don’t know why people are speculating baselessly when he has been explicit about why he’s bought a few houses
Are you wilfully misunderstanding the point about consistency? Once again: it's not about Rashford being consistent, it's about me be consistent in my values. I don't think people should be BTL landlords, so if someone is one, I'm going to disagree with it. That's. All.That's what matters to me, and not whether he can match up or be put down for his failure to achieve a high enough standard in some unspecified 'consistency' index which I doubt he gives a fuck about or all the people he's helping.
What tune is that? I couldn't give a fuck what the Mail thinks about diddly squat, again, it's what I think about a given set of facts. I don't like BTL landlords, so if it turns out Rashford has become one, that'll be disappointing. If it turns out he hasn't, then that's ok too.And I can't believe we're all dancing to the fucking Daily Mail's tune here.
Nope, and as such I don't believe I've directly criticised him for it? I raised the issue of him being a multi-millionaire as something that many on urban would have a problem with (again, didn't think it would be that controversial) as an example of something we've all been dealing with while (frequently) praising all that he's done. Then, because that's where the conversation went, said the same thing about the BTL issue as well, if it were true.YOU DON'T EVEN KNOW IF HE IS ONE.
He said he’d bought the properties as an investment. It’s even on this thread ffs. Don’t think that’s a reason to hang him or owt thoughHe said to rent to private tenants on AST contracts at market rate or above?
If the Mail hadn't posted that shitty article we wouldn't be having this entirely speculative discussion.What tune is that? I couldn't give a fuck what the Mail thinks about diddly squat, again, it's what I think about a given set of facts. I don't like BTL landlords, so if it turns out Rashford has become one, that'll be disappointing. If it turns out he hasn't, then that's ok too.
Like my signed Bowie albums?He said he’d bought the properties as an investment. It’s even on this thread ffs. Don’t think that’s a reason to hang him or owt though
Except it may have been he bought them as an investment for his family.He said he’d bought the properties as an investment. It’s even on this thread ffs. Don’t think that’s a reason to hang him or owt though
Don’t know what you mean by thatLike my signed Bowie albums?
Not sure what difference that makes.Except it may have been he bought them as an investment for his family.
Aye, fair enough, we would be ignorant of the purchase.If the Mail hasn't posted that shitty article we wouldn't be having this entirely speculative discussion.
How many properties are there in London bought by Chinese or Russians as an investment but wastefully remain empty? Better to rent them out on low rent than leave them empty.He said he’d bought the properties as an investment. It’s even on this thread ffs. Don’t think that’s a reason to hang him or owt though
Can we just clarify who's agreeing with the Daily Mail here?
AgreedHow many properties are there in London bought by Chinese or Russians as an investment but wastefully remain empty? Better to rent them out on low rent than leave them empty.
They increase in value, hence are an investmentDon’t know what you mean by that
Personally, if he were buying them for his family to live in, I'd have no problem with that*. I believe homes should be bought to live in, not to rent or sell for profit.Not sure what difference that makes.
Please don't link to that rag. It is beneath you and even beneath the Daily Wail.Scum link but:
Manchester United star Marcus Rashford sets up a property firm
MANCHESTER United’s teenage sensation Marcus Rashford is setting up a property firm to help him invest his millions. Marcus, 19, is to buy homes to rent in the North West after launching Mucs Prope…www.google.co.uk
Ah right. I assumed (rightly) that buying a house as an investment meant you’d generate income from letting it. Bit of a gamble to think you might be able to sell it for profitThey increase in value, hence are an investment