Oh, the Mail would dig until it found an angle it could exploit, regardless. I think Rashford is striking a nice balance between engaging with this shit, and rising above it.I'd piss with laughter if it turned out Rashford was letting these houses at way below market rates, just to house people who would have otherwise struggled. That'd mug more than a few of his critics off.
Oh, the Mail would dig until it found an angle it could exploit, regardless. I think Rashford is striking a nice balance between engaging with this shit, and rising above it.
That was my first impression, given his remarks.It could be read that he's bought the fairly modest homes for his family.
It's just fucking ridiculous to even start quibbling about all this when you consider the fucking amazing work he's already done. At age 23. More than 99% of nitpicking activist types ever achieve in their whole lives. He already gives up his time, his energy and his intellect to fighting for poor families and he uses his status to get things done. He doesn't have to do any of this, and the fact he still does when he's occupying a millionaires' world of comfort speaks volumes of his decency as a human being. Fat too many are quick to forget where they come from when the money comes in.That was my first impression, given his remarks.
It's just about consistency. Many people think both millionaires and landlords* shouldn't exist, so it would be hypocritical if suddenly we give someone a pass because we like one of them.And he buys a few homes out of it for his family or as an investment for his family in the future, who gives a fuck?
It could be read that he's bought the fairly modest homes for his family.
They only need look at themselvesRashford is clearly a Good Egg. The mail should look into the finances of some of the people on their end of the political spectrum, starting with their esteemed proprietor lord whatsiscunt.
What are these standards of consistency that a 23 year old has to supposedly live up to? Who wrote them?It's just about consistency. Many people think both millionaires and landlords* shouldn't exist, so it would be hypocritical if suddenly we give someone a pass because we like one of them.
He should be, and has been, commended for all he's done and the way he's conducted himself, few are disputing that.
Personally I don't think that's fucking ridiculous, it's just a three-dimensional reading of a three-dimensional human.
*I'm honestly still not clear if Rashford is planning on renting them, so I'm personally not currently laying that at his feet at this point, just mentioning it because it's come up on the thread.
It's not about his consistency, it's about ours:What are these standards of consistency that a 23 year old has to supposedly live up to? Who wrote them
If you're cool with some people being millionaires and landlords, fair enough, that's up to you, but for those of us who aren't, to be consistent we can't give him a pass on those because of all the good stuff he has done. It can't be "alright when Marcus does it" because we like him.Many people think both millionaires and landlords* shouldn't exist, so it would be hypocritical if suddenly we give someone a pass because we like one of them.
What are these standards of consistency that a 23 year old has to supposedly live up to? Who wrote them?
This is classic left-infighting fucking bullshit. He's making a fucking huge difference to millions of families in poverty and some people are getting all uptight about whether he's 'consistent' enough for their liking and their personal brand of politics.
It's not about his consistency, it's about ours:
I don't think anyone's even gone in particularly hard on Rashford. Everyone's acknowledged he's done some brilliant and incredibly important work.
We're simply, at the same time as the above, acknowledging there are aspects of his life which do not sit well with our beliefs.
Certainly, I don't begrudge him his wealth as much as I do someone who inherited it or someone who acts like a cunt with it, but I still think the existence of millionaires creates an unequal society. That's all.
This, in a nutshell. Rashford has clearly been adopted as ‘one of us’ thereby meaning even when he’s wrong it can be dissembled that he’s right (‘maybe he’s got the houses for the family’ or ‘maybe he’s giving them away to the less fortunate’ type of speculation) or worse that millionaires are inevitable and we should just accept it and how they spend their money to accumulate even more.
Oh fuck off.
What would you do in his position? A hungry, poor kid, who Man U picks up and ends up paying multiple millions just fir doing what comes naturally to you?
There are millions of hungry poor kids trapped in extortionate privately rented accommodation.
Campaign for a sovereign nation to take back control?And some of them are less hungry cos of Rashford. Again, what would you do with those millions if you had his talent?
Freeman on the land. It's the only way to be sure.Campaign for a sovereign nation to take back control?
And some of them are less hungry cos of Rashford. Again, what would you do with those millions if you had his talent?
So we do know for a fact he is a landlord?You seem to think that he had no choice but to become a landlord. He/any other millionaire could just look after their family and mates and community and, ya know, not seek to keep accumulating more. It’s not like he needs to save for a rainy day is it?
So we do know for a fact he is a landlord?
You seem to think that he had no choice but to become a landlord. He/any other millionaire could just look after their family and mates and community and, ya know, not seek to keep accumulating more. It’s not like he needs to save for a rainy day is it?
Brilliant. We're arguing now and it's because of a Daily Heil article.
Ffs (or this is peak Urban. Either way works)
Invest/buy/assetBy his own account he decided to begin to invest in property. If he had bought property for his family and/or mates wouldn’t he have just said so?
By his own account he decided to begin to invest in property. If he had bought property for his family and/or mates wouldn’t he have just said so?