ska invita
back on the other side
this list was interesting - one with all the best selling albums of the 90s wouldnt bewhat's the point of making a best of list and missing some of the best albums off it?
this list was interesting - one with all the best selling albums of the 90s wouldnt bewhat's the point of making a best of list and missing some of the best albums off it?
this list was interesting - one with all the best selling albums of the 90s wouldnt be
Several of the most influential electronic artists from the decade, who produced seminal albums in that decade missing from a list of the best albums of the decade supposedly by an electronic music based magazine, it's not because the music wasn't good enough, it's because the authors decided they weren't going to put them in their list. I'd say that's down to their pretentious attitude to the list, not sure what you'd call it.some albums I listened to as a student are missing, therefore its a list created by pretentious obscurantists.
maybe, but it was a good decision as its made a list worth reading.I'd say that's down to their pretentious attitude to the list, not sure what you'd call it.
it isnt a list of the most influential lot popular records, its a list of the best - which can only ever be a subjective view. I'm glad they've missed off the usual drab parade of crossover dance music & unit shifting indie rock that usually makes up these tedious lists. Also, have you listened to leftism recently?Several of the most influential electronic artists from the decade, who produced seminal albums in that decade missing from a list of the best albums of the decade supposedly by an electronic music based magazine, it's not because the music wasn't good enough, it's because the authors decided they weren't going to put them in their list. I'd say that's down to their pretentious attitude to the list, not sure what you'd call it.
most albums listened to by nearly everyone are missing, therefore its a list created by pretentious obscurantists.
Thats a list id like to seePersonally I spent most of the 90s listening to deeply uncool Heavy Metal records that wouldn't make anyone's best of list. If I had a 'soundtrack to the 90s' it would probably have Earth vs The Wildhearts at the top.
Thats a list id like to see
Pain - Dub War
Im of the view that the idea of an untouchable musical canon (that just happens to line up exactly with the music we listened to as students), and anything that doesn't stick rigidly to it is somehow pretentious or smug is deeply irritating.
Thing is Tim, its totally subjective - Nirvana meant something to you and nothing to me, other than good stuff for the radio. Great band obviously (objectively speaking), im not saying they arent.Its not 'an untouchable musical cannon' - its the music that was widely popular and had the most impact had the time. So Celine Dion - no. Nirvana - yes.
Thing is Tim, its totally subjective - Nirvana meant something to you and nothing to me, other than good stuff for the radio. Great band obviously (objectively speaking), im not saying they arent.
This reminds me of the bob marley not one of the best reggae vocalists arguments....
none of this has anything to do with 'best' though.Its not 'an untouchable musical cannon' - its the music that was widely popular and had the most impact had the time. So Celine Dion - no. Nirvana - yes. Something like 90% of the music on that list is very niche and obscure - so, whatever its merits - it didn't have much impact at the time. Neither has much of it gone on to be hugely influential on a wide scale since (such as the velvet underground or the stooges growing massively in status over the years).
So if the compilers of the list want to make the argument that this music deserves more attention - than fair enough. But they are not. They are saying - 'these are the greatest 100 albums of the 90s' and excluding the vast majority of what most people under the age of 35 were listening to - including most people who were making and writing about music at the time.
Look at the headliners for the music festivals of the 90s - virtually none of them are on that list. I guess thats cos all the really cool people were in a side tent - or obscure but painfully cool club - nodding along to some up its arse electronic ambient wibble whilst all the sheeple were ignorantly enjoying (insert name of virtually any successful act from the 90s here).
That does indeed smack of smug, pretentious wank.
Also, I think if we're talking influence, you underestimate the influence the likes of Celine Dion has on music, culture and peoples lives.
Its not 'an untouchable musical cannon' - its the music that was widely popular and had the most impact had the time. So Celine Dion - no. Nirvana - yes.