“I’m just asking questions here”FFS I'm not saying that, I'm saying that's an opinion that someone could hold, and they could support it by making the same assertion that you did: that the fact someone doesn't have something is proof they don't need it. That doesn't stack up with carless people just the same as it doesn't stack up with homeless people.
If you want to prove he doesn't need a car you'll have to do better than "he doesn't have one".
How many miles do they have to walk? Oh wait, you don't know.
Interestingly and unusually, most of the comments under that article are from people telling them to get a grip.This is a good one as well: Angry couple 'cut off' by roadworks outside their own home
I appreciate the thought but I suspect if you did this on one special day a year, people would be very courteous on that day and things would actually run smoother than usual. It would go wrong if if were like this regularly, not as a one-offIt's quite common for car people to have this notion that their liberties are being restricted by faceless bureaucrats.
We should have a day each year where all traffic lights are turned off, parking is allowed absolutely anywhere, the highway code doesn't apply and anyone is allowed to drive.
See how long it takes for them to demand that faceless bureaucrats re-activate all the huge systems of regulation and control that are necessary to let motor traffic function without complete chaos ensuing.
Not if I got my hands on an articulated lorry they wouldn't.I appreciate the thought but I suspect if you did this on one special day a year, people would be very courteous on that day and things would actually run smoother than usual.
Irreproachable evidence that proves beyond doubt all drivers are like this guy.Lorry driver allegedly rammed P&O protest blockade at Scots port as man charged
Witnesses told how the 7.5-tonne vehicle forced protesters to retreat at the entrance to Cairnryan Ferry Port in Dumfries and Galloway.www.dailyrecord.co.uk
Good to see the RMT taking inspiration from Insulate Britain.
And more proof that drivers don't just hate the environment - they hate workers' rights and maritime safety too.
No surprises there of course.
That’s undoubtedly a cunt’s trick. Can’t imagine many people thinking otherwise.Welcome to Shoreham, Kent, where car owners park on the pavement around a parking layby. It's like this all the time.
I'm considering hiring a few cars and parking them in the parking layby for a few days to see what happens.
View attachment 321356
Welcome to Shoreham, Kent, where car owners park on the pavement around a parking layby. It's like this all the time.
I'm considering hiring a few cars and parking them in the parking layby for a few days to see what happens.
View attachment 321356
It’s car owners everywhere pretty much. The number of people that object to cycle hangars outside their house round hereNewish developments, in particular those bendy roads and cul-de-sacs, are often particularly bad for territorial nutjobs.
.And more proof that drivers don't just hate the environment - they hate workers' rights and maritime safety too.
No surprises there of course.
It’s car owners everywhere pretty much. The number of people that object to cycle hangars outside their house round here
Newish developments, in particular those bendy roads and cul-de-sacs, are often particularly bad for territorial nutjobs.
Why do think there’s no need? In Lambeth there’s a huge waiting list and until recently a couple of individuals on a street could stop them being put it.If there’s no need for a cycle hangar at a particular location its probably not surprising that people there object to it.
Why do think there’s no need? In Lambeth there’s a huge waiting list and until recently a couple of individuals on a street could stop them being put it.
The council identifies a suitable location and asks the street - a couple of people object and it has been people that live where the location is outside - and so they couldn’t install it. They’ve changed it now and just get on with it.You said people were objecting to cycle hangers “outside their house”. If every householder on a street did that, there obviously wouldn’t be a burning desire for anyone on that street to have a cycle hanger.
If a council is allowing a couple of individuals on a street to prevent any cycle hangers from being put on that street, that’s obviously an entirely different situation to that which you originally outlined.
The council identifies a suitable location and asks the street - a couple of people object and it has been people that live where the location is outside - and so they couldn’t install it. They’ve changed it now and just get on with it.
You really add soooo much to this thread…..Sounds like your council is shit, most of them are so that's no surprise.