platinumsage
HaveMyPassword123
It's fine to be a wealthy toff/landlord etc if you're on the left e.g. Tony Benn. Never mind your actions, as long as you say the right things you're totally cool.
And angry alcoholic on the internet wants pensioners in social housing to freeze or bankrupt themselves. I know that ad hominem just means 'insults' round here but it literally means what you've just done. You've attacked the person not their argument.wants free insulation for everyone.
Are you going to get abusive again and start crying?And angry alcoholic on the internet wants pensioners in social housing to freeze or bankrupt themselves. I know that ad hominem just means 'insults' round here but it literally means what you've just done. You've attacked the person not their argument.
You'll have to do a lot better than that.Are you going to get abusive again and start crying?
And angry alcoholic on the internet wants pensioners in social housing to freeze or bankrupt themselves. I know that ad hominem just means 'insults' round here but it literally means what you've just done. You've attacked the person not their argument.
So you've read their in depth policy documents and you disagree with the The Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET) 2018 report, Scaling Up Retro fit 2050?He's not blocking roads to so that pensioners in social housing can have their homes insulated, something that most people can agree with. He's doing it so that every home is insulted at public expense, whether it, or the owner, really needs it or not.
There are millions of homes in the UK that would benefit massively from more insulation, but there are millions where the benefits would be only marginal. If you invest public money in insulating all of them, that money, and the newly trained up workforce, and insulating materials, will in millions of cases be wasted because there will be much better uses for that money and those people (trained heat pump installers, or the purchase of solar panels or whatever).
Their demands are ill-thought out, I would say childish, but children are generally better at thinking up policies that these muppets.
I won't stoop to your level by bringing your drug use into the argument.You'll have to do a lot better than that.
So you've read their in depth policy documents and you disagree with the The Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET) 2018 report, Scaling Up Retro fit 2050?
Well, I actually think some parts of your last post but one are a reasonable response to their demands. But I think it's better to have straightforward demands with costs and benefits than just 'lower emissions'. And remember the alternative isn't investing it on solar and heat pumps. At the moment the alternative is doing not much of anything.Yes, Ive read the IET report, but it seems Insulate Britain’s haven’t, otherwise they wouldn’t have issued their two headline demands.
Chance would be a fine thing. I was merely demonstrating the inadequacy of your own argument. Pointing at someone's faults doesn't prove anything about their point.I won't stoop to your level by bringing your drug use into the argument.
Of course it does if their point is that they want their six houses insulated for free, so they can rent them out for more profit.Chance would be a fine thing. I was merely demonstrating the inadequacy of your own argument. Pointing at someone's faults doesn't prove anything about their point.
Well, despite your weird conspiracy theory that a large group of wealthy people have glued themselves to the road, got themselves roughed up and been arrested in order to do a last minute switch and get their houses insulated instead of the social housing that they've clearly made the demand for rather than just paying for it, I think it's reasonable to at least deal with the demand directly rather than dismiss it entirely because a few of them are cunts and twats.Of course it does if their point is that they want their six houses insulated for free, so they can rent them out for more profit.
And angry alcoholic on the internet ...
Ffs. You really do deserve all you get on this thread.
But repeatedly tagging me into the conversation, deliberately antagonising me and then calling me Mr Meltdown is just dandy. It'd be nice if you showed everyone exactly where your wavy lines are drawn if you're going to judge.
That was just Bahnoff Strasse's post to me with a couple of words changed Princess.You reap what you sow. I had no intention of posting here today until your goose stepping comment.
That was just Bahnoff Strasse's post to me with a couple of words changed Princess.
I was having a perfectly reasonable conversation until you turned up clutching your pearls Princess.And? For someone who regularly gets his arse kicked and stomps off like a baby, you don't do yourself any favours.
I was having a perfectly reasonable conversation until you turned up clutching your pearls Princess.
Get you. You deliberately turned the thread into a slanging match from page one. You reap what you sow Princess.Yeah I guess calling posters alcoholics is perfectly reasonable in maomao land. Glass houses, stones and all that ...
Get you. You deliberately turned the thread into a slanging match from page one. You reap what you sow Princess.
You're always so sure of other people's mental state. What exactly are you threatening to do Princess?Lol. You sure you want to do this? That bottom jaw of yours is already starting to wobble.
He wouldn't get away with it if he was calling people drug addicts, and it seems "I'm getting professional help for being an angry cunt" is a get out of jail free card for being an angry cunt.Yeah I guess calling posters alcoholics is perfectly reasonable in maomao land. Glass houses, stones and all that ...
You're always so sure of other people's mental state. What exactly are you threatening to do Princess?
Yep, I can feel the steam coming out of you and Spymaster's ears from here.At least we have another meltdown to look forward to.
Too pissed to type again?