Saul Goodman
It's all good, man
Would you rather they died?That's kind of my point. Dependant on cars even though they don't drive.
Without cars they wouldn't get the help they need.
Would you rather they died?That's kind of my point. Dependant on cars even though they don't drive.
Medical transport is not private car ownership. Even when using private health providers.Would you rather they died?
Without cars they wouldn't get the help they need.
They only get an ambulance if they're unable to source alternative transport. Ambulances should only be used in emergencies.Medical transport is not private car ownership. Even when using private health providers.
Again. Medical transport is not the same as an emergency ambulance. For instance, cancer patients are often advised against public transport when their immune systems are particularly low. We've discussed this before.They only get an ambulance if they're unable to source alternative transport. Ambulances should only be used in emergencies.
Is it medical transport if its a large friend transporting them?Again. Medical transport is not the same as an emergency ambulance. For instance, cancer patients are often advised against public transport when their immune systems are particularly low. We've discussed this before.
A proportion of necessary journeys are made in private cars. More so in countries with ridiculous healthcare systems. This is not an argument for private car ownership, it's an argument for socialism.Is it medical transport if its a large friend transporting them?
The argument was over the size of cars in America. Now that one has been put to bed, with an resounding victory for the common sense party, we can get back to arguing about the things that matter.A proportion of necessary journeys are made in private cars. More so in countries with ridiculous healthcare systems. This is not an argument for private car ownership, it's an argument for socialism.
I'm not even sure what you're actual argument was. That all US cars need to be that large in case they need to carry someone in the top 0.1% for bodyweight?The argument was over the size of cars in America. Now that one has been put to bed, with an astounding victory for the common sense party, we can get back to arguing about the things that matter.
I have a suspicion that Saul isn’t even pro-car in real life. I think he’s just anti-teuchter.
When even Coronation Street are against you you’ve probably lost the argument.
The Mrs had this on tonight. It was hilarious!Coronation Street... the harbinger of transport future.
FYI, Len Fairclough was an avid cyclist.
Yeah, and you just happened to be watching it tooThe Mrs had this on tonight. It was hilarious!
FYI, Len Fairclough was an avid cyclist.
Yeah, and you just happened to be watching it too
I pretty much always watch Corrie by default over the top of the computer screen. I watched tiis one properly though as it was so laughable. They had a kid doing some comedy choking in the street. Then kid’s mum goes up to the owner of a van and says the van has to be taken off the road, like it was THAT VAN that caused the kid to choke. Then an ambulance arrives but can’t get through because of too many parked car’s. Then kid’s mum is reminded that she “drives a tank” but says “yeah but I’m selling it” not realising that that just means someone else will be driving it. Then kid’s mum smashes the van up with an iron bar.Yeah, and you just happened to be watching it too
I have a suspicion that Saul isn’t even pro-car in real life. I think he’s just anti-teuchter.
Drones, Corrie, fast cars - what exciting lives!
I pretty much always watch Corrie by default over the top of the computer screen. I watched tiis one properly though as it was so laughable. They had a kid doing some comedy choking in the street. Then kid’s mum goes up to the owner of a van and says the van has to be taken off the road, like it was THAT VAN that caused the kid to choke. Then an ambulance arrives but can’t get through because of too many parked car’s. Then kid’s mum is reminded that she “drives a tank” but says “yeah but I’m selling it” not realising that that just means someone else will be driving it. Then kid’s mum smashes the van up with an iron bar.
It was fantastically shit!
I don't watch soap operas but I imagine that in the past they had story lines that introduced modern ideas about gay rights or racism or mental health or sexism to conservative audiences, who will have laughed them off at the time. It doesn't really matter if the writing is clunky, it gets people thinking and brings the discussion into the mainstream, where eventually most people will accept what's right (in this case getting shot of private cars) because it's a no brainer once you get all the old fashioned nonsense ideas out of the way. Anyway, it's another clear indication that the propaganda war is gradually being won.
Fuck - it’s like watching a private circle jerk.
No it wasn’tWhat a strange thing to write......especially as the phrase was coined here on urban a few years ago.
What a strange thing to write......especially as the phrase was coined here on urban a few years ago.
Are you by any chance a banned returner?
The band formed in 1979 must have been time travellers then:What a strange thing to write......especially as the phrase was coined here on urban a few years ago.
Are you by any chance a banned returner?
Sounds a bit like your comparing gay rights to beastiality there. Maybe you could get a column in the Daily Mail.Except this one is being done as anti-environmentalism. Maybe not on purpose but that's what they're achieving. All of the fuckwits are the campaigners. Much like RL, I suppose! Apparently their next campaign is an animal rights one which they'll illustrate with edcraw shagging a monkey out of "love".
Sounds a bit like your comparing gay rights to beastiality there.
No it wasn’t
A relatively brand new poster using the phrase ust triggered my spidey senses.