Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
I reckon it's Martin
I reckon it's Martin
This money that Saudi has pumped into the Ummah has had a definite effect. I'll give you an example, I recently took part in a Nikkah in the midlands, it was completely sexually segregated right up to almost the end of the reception. Nikkahs in the 70s and early 80s in the very same community had un segregated receptions. Saudi money has been pushing their austeer 'southern baptist' burn in the hellfire, the shaytan is everywhere waiting to corrupt you, interpretation of islam since the 1980s.
Sorry. I thought it was a piss-take
You are seriously radio rental, you racist trot cunt.
ahh, ok... I'm very tired, and very over caffinated... but people like Das Uberdog get on my wick... didn't realise I'd descended into barely intelligable hyperbolic parody...
there are 6,000 saudi princes, many of whom are sympathetic to the sort of vile views on parade at the troxy on 20/6, and of course there is a saudi cleric on the billI think the political impact of Saudi money is overstated; what we've seen in recent years is a universal movement within the Islamic community away from secularized nationalism and towards theological Islamism, which corresponds more directly to the defeat of secular national liberationist projects and their replacement with Islamist intellectual and activist currents (and also the comparative 'successes' of reactionary bodies like the Taliban and Hamas in achieving real power) rather than the direction of cash-flows.
What institutional protection are Saudi princes capable of offering to this Troxy group, anyway? Ultimately, any sway the Saudi aristocracy might be able to wield over the Islamic community is compromised by their overrall commitment to capitalism, and thus the state entities from which Western Capital is organized.
carry on chief, with every post you make it clearer that - as i said above - you know not of what you witter.i'd love to rub your face in a pavement you tanky piece of shit. you gonna be around in Tower Hamlets attacking muslims at this meeting, eh? maybe we can meet up.
I think the political impact of Saudi money is overstated; what we've seen in recent years is a universal movement within the Islamic community away from secularized nationalism and towards theological Islamism, which corresponds more directly to the defeat of secular national liberationist projects and their replacement with Islamist intellectual and activist currents (and also the comparative 'successes' of reactionary bodies like the Taliban and Hamas in achieving real power) rather than the direction of cash-flows.
What institutional protection are Saudi princes capable of offering to this Troxy group, anyway? Ultimately, any sway the Saudi aristocracy might be able to wield over the Islamic community is compromised by their overrall commitment to capitalism, and thus the state entities from which Western Capital is organized.
I somehow doubt that you watched this before you posted the rant?
ahh, ok... I'm very tired, and very over caffinated... but people like Das Uberdog get on my wick... didn't realise I'd descended into barely intelligable hyperbolic parody...
have you been living under a fucking rock for the past 15 years? je-zuz... when i actually do try and engage with someone this is the brain-dead inanity i recieve.
Saudi is considered the 'gold standard' for a lot of Sunni muslims. Despite Saudi's clear breaks with what the Koran says on things like marriage. It pays for the constructions of Masjeeds and pays for Imams to preach its version of Islam. That's a fairly big sway.
how about every piece of domestic 'terror' legislation that's been introduced since 2001? endless policy announcements from the Home Office on a weekly basis under John Reid in the Blair years; attacks on the right to wear the veil, paranoid security threat announcements, often entirely fabricated (such as the Old Trafford incident), i really could go on but tbh the fact you have evidently not bothered to look around at the outside world for the past decade really makes me resent it.
how on earth can you say that stop and search powers under section 44 aren't impacting upon ordinary muslims?
what about state propaganda about 'radical mosques' or central diktat that Imams have to rat on children 'at risk of radicalization'? huge cctv presences in Islamic neighbourhoods (as recently uncovered by the Guardian in Birmingham) and massive surveillance operations overhwelming any reasonable assessment of risk? have you seriously missed all of this?
this is insane - every single one of these powers and developments has disproportionately affected the Muslim community.
their professed ideological agenda is totally and utterly compatible with the State's project of social control, and with the establishment's scapegoating of migrant communities. surely you can see that!? the biggest argument the mainstream press have against the EDL is that they're uncomfortable watching ordinary people take these 'legitimate' views into their own hands and doing something about it, where they should rest their faith in the arbitrating powers of the state's legal and judiciary functions.
no, not at all - i've seen it. if you were wading in on my side then i'd still rather not be represented by the bile-machine that is the IoI.
Which state are you talking about? EDL aren't connected to the British State at all.
Do you have any statistics for that?
Two neo-Nazi member of the extremist English Defence League have appeared in court accused of soliciting the hate killings of Jews.
this 'threat' from radical Islam is non-existant. the very real threat from black London gangs is far more prevalent on the streets of London
"Thou doth protest....", etc and don't flatter yourself.