I thought they were all under OfCom for standards now?the standards and remits aren't the same
I thought they were all under OfCom for standards now?the standards and remits aren't the same
Complaint to Ofcom will redirect you to BBC complaintsI thought they were all under OfCom for standards now?
Oh aye, Ofcom the great leveller. Who looks at the BBC and thinks to themselves, 'Before I complain about this thing, I wonder how Ofcom rates them for truth'? Nah. It's the charter, the funding, the history, expectations & the subsequent self-reinforced identity, the whole environment.I thought they were all under OfCom for standards now?
Buy some blinds. They're cheeper than a licence. If they see flickers it's a DVD, now fuck off and get a warrant.the problem i face is the tv can be seen from outside the flat
we have blinds. we do not want to live behind blinds so we open them during the day.Buy some blinds. They're cheeper than a licence. If they see flickers it's a DVD, now fuck off and get a warrant.
Is there really daytime TV worth watching?we have blinds. we do not want to live behind blinds so we open them during the day.
Here's another mistake: somehow, they filmed and broadcast a brutal bodying of the leader of the opposition before even securing a date for a similar interview with the actual prime minister
don't know, i'm at workIs there really daytime TV worth watching?
You're better off there. There's fuck all on tellydon't know, i'm at work
Well, yes. Johnson has two options here: he can ignore people calling him a coward for a couple of weeks, or he can have his own disembowelment at the hands of Neil become the most shared video clips of the season. I wonder which he'll go for.my source in number ten tells me johnson will offer neil an interview slot on 14 december
Is that in the Arts & Entertainment section.I halfheartedly apologise (on page 16 of the thread)
There was talk of cunning technology that was capable of enabling inspectors to synchronise the relative brightness of the light in a room with that of the currently broadcast channels, but because of the unique way in which the BBC licensing regime is funded (ie, via workers on a "commission" for every prosecution they get), that kind of tech isn't going to be feasible. So if the screen isn't visible from the street, they're unlikely to be any the wiser.we have blinds. we do not want to live behind blinds so we open them during the day.
You should watch it. It's very accurate. I imagine.I haven't actually seen it, but I don't understand why or how they made W1A. For an organisation that's often afraid of itself, it seems nuts that they made a satire of themselves. I once wrote a blog post explaining to the world that our particular project was really good, despite public opinion, and I said that, "a very new formative product like ours is largely whatever you perceive it to be. That could be anywhere from giving you a sparkling new way to access something you love, to having wheeled out an accidental tribute to W1A". They asked me to remove the reference. I binned the whole thing instead.
Everyone rides Bromptons.
*shrug*
Well, yes. Johnson has two options here: he can ignore people calling him a coward for a couple of weeks, or he can have his own disembowelment at the hands of Neil become the most shared video clips of the season. I wonder which he'll go for.
My heart bleedsSome unfortunate soul will actually have to read that.
Most of the public seem to think it's left-wing. I guess some of them really mean to say it's liberal, like The Guardian.Is any of this bias stuff cropping up irl? I know the Left bubble is getting (understandably) worked up about it, but beyond?
I've not heard it...yet.
Point is, complaints get read. Worst case they add to aggregated numbers in a report - n complaints about this particular thing this week. The Munchetty debacle also showed what can be done, for better or worse, with a single complaint, but I'm not going to get into that one.My heart bleeds
how the fuck would I know?Is any of this bias stuff cropping up irl? I know the Left bubble is getting (understandably) worked up about it, but beyond?
I've not heard it...yet.
I've been seeing references to this type of thing for years and years. It's nonsense. It's a misunderstanding of how audience selection works. They actively try to achieve "balance" when you apply to be in the audience. I've been in the audience, when it was in Glasgow many years ago. A researcher called me back and asked me about my politics. He asked me which party I thought I was closest to. I said none, I was an anarchist. He said "we've not got any anarchists yet. Are you an SSP supporter?" I said "Absolutely not".Tory plant at multiple episodes BBCQT
There's certainly something in that. My mate, who had a right go at Swinson, was all over the right wing press as being a plant because she is an actress, and so cant possibly have an opinion that hasn't been written out for her. Obvious bollocks.I've been seeing references to this type of thing for years and years. It's nonsense. It's a misunderstanding of how audience selection works. They actively try to achieve "balance" when you apply to be in the audience. I've been in the audience, when it was in Glasgow many years ago. A researcher called me back and asked me about my politics. He asked me which party I thought I was closest to. I said none, I was an anarchist. He said "we've not got any anarchists yet. Are you an SSP supporter?" I said "Absolutely not".
There was a list of profiling questions, while they tried to work out if I was going to skew their audience. That's how it's done. So of course there will be Tory activists in the audience. And Labour. And Lib Dem. And, if an SNP panel member is present, SNP. And so on.
I mean, jesus christ man. We're so deep in the bubble everyone I know sees Corbyn as a centrist compromise at best.