Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Driving Standards

In Beckham's case I would be having words with the PA who has not been sending these letters on to him.

He's claiming the car was on loan from Bentley and the letter arrived at Bentley a day late, thus removing himself from a possible perjury and setting a minion up for that fall.
 
I've just come back from shopping, and whilst driving into town I saw one of the scariest things ever.
I was driving behind a car, and the driver of the car pulled across to the other side of the road. I thought she was pulling into a petrol station but she passed the petrol station and continued to drive on the wrong side of the road. This went on for about 200m, so I pulled alongside her, looked across, and she was looking down at the phone on her lap and typing on it. I couldn't believe my fucking eyes. She wasn't looking at the road at all. Then I noticed a unit and 40 foot trailer heading straight towards her, so I blew my horn but she still didn't take her eyes off the phone. I kept blowing my horn until she eventually looked across at me, and I pointed at the truck heading straight at her, at which point she swerved back across onto into my lane, narrowly missing the front of the truck and closely missing the front of my car, before leaving the road, climbing a grass bank and somehow managing to get back on the road, whilst missing a lamp post by mere inches, then carried on driving, like nothing had happened.
I can't believe anyone could be so fucking stupid and reckless.
 
Poor Ferrari, but you have got to laugh. :D

OMYR3XNIHNHVXHN3DDOEDLSOAY.jpg


Ferrari crashes en-route to Goodwood Revival
 
I've just come back from shopping, and whilst driving into town I saw one of the scariest things ever.
I was driving behind a car, and the driver of the car pulled across to the other side of the road. I thought she was pulling into a petrol station but she passed the petrol station and continued to drive on the wrong side of the road. This went on for about 200m, so I pulled alongside her, looked across, and she was looking down at the phone on her lap and typing on it. I couldn't believe my fucking eyes. She wasn't looking at the road at all. Then I noticed a unit and 40 foot trailer heading straight towards her, so I blew my horn but she still didn't take her eyes off the phone. I kept blowing my horn until she eventually looked across at me, and I pointed at the truck heading straight at her, at which point she swerved back across onto into my lane, narrowly missing the front of the truck and closely missing the front of my car, before leaving the road, climbing a grass bank and somehow managing to get back on the road, whilst missing a lamp post by mere inches, then carried on driving, like nothing had happened.
I can't believe anyone could be so fucking stupid and reckless.

Get her number plate? That's so bad I would be keen on reporting it. It sounds like it's only a matter of time before they seriously injure (or kill) themselves and/ or someone else.
 
It's a shame they've sped this up really, as I think it'd be comical enough at normal speed. I love how the driver filming just keeps going like nothing out of the ordinary happened :D

Because it's sped up and filmed on a potato, it's hard to tell, but they seem to have their brake lights on and not be slowing down.
 
That says you can be done for smoking, the act of smoking is not prohibited though, only if it leads to careless or worse driving. Same would apply to popping a Fruit Pastel in your gob.
 
It doesn't make it right, but many drivers do and can be fined for doing so.
15 months is a pittance for taking a life. :(
These was talk of making the sentences tougher, though clearly not in this case.
 
15 months, he went through the cycle box on purpose, how can it be careless?



from memory "careless driving" is "standard of driving falls below what is expected" and "dangerous driving" is "standard of driving falls far below what is expected". I might not have that verbatim but it's roughly the wording of the law

Big issue here is that almost every jury/judge/magistrate will be a driver and you can bet lots of them drive into ASBs all the time, so how many of them see this driving as falling (far) below what is expected? None basically, hence charges of "dangerous driving" don't get put forward by the CPS as they see "careless driving" as a more realistic chance of successful prosecution. Laws need changing.

I mean just look at this case: Judge lashes out at airport drop-off fees as he releases road rage driver | Metro News driver drives into car park attendant, carrying them on the bonnet, because they don't want to pay £3 charge. Judge gives a suspended sentence because judge thinks £3 charge is outrageous. wtf?
 
Just as a quick on-topic shout back to the OP, I drove from South Wales to Wiltshire a couple of weeks ago and just about everyone on the road was very competent, safe and considerate of other road users. :)

At least when I was passing. :hmm:
 
From Ms Roman's family:

After Northcott's conviction, Ms Roman's family called for motorists to be more vigilant of cyclists, especially around cycle boxes at junctions.

"We feel Karla was let down by the driver of the coach when he disregarded the cycle box, which resulted in this fatal incident", they said.

"We would appeal to any drivers reading this to think about your actions and respect the cycle box."

She was let down.

Seems that we are very conditioned to give a very lenient outlook to drivers whose wilful negligence kills.
 
If you can be done for smoking you should def be done for driving with a stinking cold, or having just had 2 hours sleep.

HGV drivers are only allowed to drive for so many hours without taking a break, I suspect coach drivers also. Although it's dangerous for car drivers, it's unenforceable, at least at the moment. It should be up to the car driver and common sense.
 
That says you can be done for smoking, the act of smoking is not prohibited though, only if it leads to careless or worse driving. Same would apply to popping a Fruit Pastel in your gob.
Same wit eating and pretty much everything else people do behind the wheel. The camera would have to prove undue care are attention. Not sure how it’ll manage that.
 
Unlike lorries, coaches can use the third lane on a motorway, after all their cargo is not as precious as a truck load of baked beans...

I liked that post, then thought, didn't they change that?

Looks like it: Q590: What types of vehicles are not allowed in the outside lane on the motorway?
  • a passenger vehicle which is constructed or adapted to carry more than eight seated passengers in addition to the driver the maximum laden weight of which exceeds 7.5 tonnes;
  • a passenger vehicle which is constructed or adapted to carry more than eight seated passengers in addition to the driver the maximum laden weight of which does not exceed 7.5 tonnes, which is required to be fitted with a speed limite
 
Back
Top Bottom