Rob Ray
Weight is meaningless
Answer the question.Despite your protestations to the contrary, you have once again confused me with some other poster who is talking about drag.
Answer the question.Despite your protestations to the contrary, you have once again confused me with some other poster who is talking about drag.
I asked first.Answer the question.
that's a really peculiar post. i don't suppose any sexuality or gender has a synonymity or monopoly on being drag queens.Sure, but the two aren’t synonymous. Trans people feel their biological sex doesn’t match what they feel their gender is. And they may or may not seek medical treatment for that. They may or may not enjoy drag, but drag queens aren’t necessarily or even mostly transgender people are they?
that's it, relax and release your inner pedant. you'll feel so much better.Pantomime and drag have similarities for sure, but they have differences as well both historically and culturally.
I would love to see half all this outrage on how bloody awful "family" films are for their ridiculously sexualised and stereotypical female characters. Virgin/Mother/Whore.What sort of monsters would show sexualised performances to kids.... Original production cel from Who Framed Roger Rabbit? | Jessica rabbit cartoon, Jessica rabbit, Jessica and roger rabbit
You've literally linked to the post where you avoid answering my question by asking your own.No you didn't. Answer the question.
isn't there only one female womble? and the smurfs, there's doctoral theses could be written about smurfetteI would love to see half all this outrage on how bloody awful "family" films are for their ridiculously sexualised and stereotypical female characters. Virgin/Mother/Whore.
Take Winnie the Pooh - one female character among all the others, and her role, aside from being a mother, is to cook and pander to the other characters after not going on any of their adventures. Yet people happily encourage their kids to absorb that crap.
tell you what, answer the question and let's see what happensYou've literally linked to the post where you avoid answering my question by asking your own.
Exactly. It sends a terrible message about gender roles at a very young age.isn't there only one female womble? and the smurfs, there's doctoral theses could be written about smurfette
He linked to a post pointing out that one kind of 'sexualised dancing' raise no ire whatsoever (and is, indeed, widely praised as family entertainment) whereas another, no more explicit, is outrageous and child abuse. Seems pretty clear.You've literally linked to the post where you avoid answering my question by asking your own.
Luckily nowadays men don’t have a virtual monopoly over literature and entertainment as they have in the past, and female voices and experiences are coming forward to create art about the world as we see it.Exactly. It sends a terrible message about gender roles at a very young age.
Nope, my question is challenging your initial characterisation. Try again. Answer the question.You've literally linked to the post where you avoid answering my question by asking your own.
this (imo) is the thing. The whole shitshow all the attention on this is a result of some of the worst people in the world, the trumpist evangelicals and their friends, pushing their mad agenda, but then the utterly self defeating response is this argument that you're either one of them, you're a nazi-adjascent bigot who deserves to be excommunicated for ever, or else you fully embrace nipple tassle baby hour or whatever, one or the other pick a side. its just so very stupid.You don't think it's potentially troublesome that all concerns about children's boundaries get coded as right-wing?
If you don't understand who Chaya Raichik is, or her relevance is to this discussion, then I think you're missing out on some fairly relevant context that would help you understand why you're getting the reactions you're getting. If you do a bit more reading about her, perhaps starting with this article, you might be a bit more able to grasp why some of us are very suspicious of the way this conversation has been shaped. I could add Patriotic Alternative to that list, how would you describe Patrotic Alternative?What?
Do you think that some of the people raising concerns about children's boundaries, such as Patriotic Alternative for example, could fairly be described as right-wing? And do you understand how that could affect the way that some people might view this issue?You don't think it's potentially troublesome that all concerns about children's boundaries get coded as right-wing?
Yes. We've still got a way to go though.Luckily nowadays men don’t have a virtual monopoly over literature and entertainment as they have in the past, and female voices and experiences are coming forward to create art about the world as we see it.
I get what you're saying here, but surely it's hard to avoid being a bit defensive when, as you say, this whole discussion is taking place on terrain shaped by those people? Hard to know what the way forward is, but I'd think it'd have to start with people collectively admitting "I don't really know that much about this subject, I've never been to the event in question and everything that I know about it comes via mad right-wingers who don't seem like a particularly reliable source?"this (imo) is the thing. The whole shitshow all the attention on this is a result of some of the worst people in the world, the trumpist evangelicals and their friends, pushing their mad agenda, but then the utterly self defeating response is this argument that you're either one of them, you're a nazi-adjascent bigot who deserves to be excommunicated for ever, or else you fully embrace nipple tassle baby hour or whatever, one or the other pick a side. its just so very stupid.
entertainers have hitherto only reflected the world in various ways; the point is to change itLuckily nowadays men don’t have a virtual monopoly over literature and entertainment as they have in the past, and female voices and experiences are coming forward to create art about the world as we see it.
sure. thing is if people don't say exactly what you'd like them to say, and in response they're filed under reactionary nazi-adjascent Bigot, what next. Who benefits from that. i dont mean you personally btw.I get what you're saying here, but surely it's hard to avoid being a bit defensive when, as you say, this whole discussion is taking place on terrain shaped by those people? Hard to know what the way forward is, but I'd think it'd have to start with people collectively admitting "I don't really know that much about this subject, I've never been to the event in question and everything that I know about it comes via mad right-wingers who don't seem like a particularly reliable source?"
And then realise what putdown they should have postedIt's ultimately a balance and a damn difficult one to judge, dependent on where someone is on the spectrum of openness, ego, argumentativeness, how prone they are to manipulative approaches, patience, life circumstances etc etc. Which is difficult enough IRL with people you know, let alone with internet randoms who could usually be fine but sitting down six pints in this time, or who's taking out the frustrations of a difficult week on the world at large but will most likely have a proper think later in the evening when they've cooled off.
l'esprit de l'escalierAnd then realise what putdown they should have posted
That's the pernicious influence of Jeremy Clarkson for you.Sadly, they'll only find it again and continue throwing it at the rest of us
I wasn't talking about drag queens, I was talking about what form of exercise might be befitting for a 12 year old girl and whether it's still sexualised if there aren't any creepy old men watching.
You can see that this is entirely different from DQST can't you? I'm in favour of both by the way, but they're absolutely wildly different things.
This is just basic whataboutery.
You do realise that it's fairly well documented that the sexual abuse of children is most prevalent in the more conservative religious households; whether Christian, Muslim or other religions?Oh give over do you think this goes down well in Muslim communities?
Involving children in sexualised acts is not subversive. It’s fucking weird.
I didn’t actually, first time I’ve heard that. What’s your evidence?You do realise that it's fairly well documented that the sexual abuse of children is most prevalent in the more conservative religious households; whether Christian, Muslim or other religions?
In other words, families with the most unhealthily conservative attitudes to sex are often where the paedos hide.
Parents who take their kids to drag queen story time events and engage in a bit of "dirty dancing" at a family do are far less prone to noncery than those buttoned-down, keep it all hidden families.
Really? The first time?I didn’t actually, first time I’ve heard that. What’s your evidence?