I think a lot of people have had a building resentment pretty well over the last 40 -50 years that their world view is ignored. They are being told how to talk, and are called out if they make the old racist/sexist jokes that they've grown up with and still enjoy laughing at. They hated the Vietnam War protestors and feel the same about general anti-war protests. Christians have seen their religion sidelined by more liberal generations, and their demands for what people should believe and how people behave ignored or ridiculed. Trump is a way to fight back.What you have to ask yourself is: why do they want to hurt those people? Νot because if their answer is “good” enough, we’ll say, “oh, okay then!” But because if we don’t understand why, we don’t have a hope in hell’s chance of defusing their hatred. People don’t just wake up one day with the thought in their head that they want to hurt others. It’s a process that happens over time, arising from a massive nexus of social experiences. So ideally, we want to do two things. First, we want to interrupt that pipeline and stop new people from becoming radicalised by hate. And second, we want to find a way to undo the process. Neither of these are possible if we haven’t understood where it is coming from.
I think this is a lot closer to the truth.I think a lot of people have had a building resentment pretty well over the last 40 -50 years that their world view is ignored. They are being told how to talk, and are called out if they make the old racist/sexist jokes that they've grown up with and still enjoy laughing at. They hated the Vietnam War protestors and feel the same about general anti-war protests. Christians have seen their religion sidelined by more liberal generations, and their demands for what people should believe and how people behave ignored or ridiculed. Trump is a way to fight back.
I read that many Latino/Latina voters were put off by being referred to by the made up word Latinx too.
I look forward to the day dogs turn their noses up at his rotting corpseI can't believe were still talking about this guy, let alone almost 300 pages into it. I can't wait for the day when I no longer have to see or hear him in the news. That date just go a whole lot further off.
There are massive contradictions in the Trump coalition:
Big pharma money/capitalist interests v anti vaxxers
Cash-only paranoids & gold standard fetishists v bitcoin “revolutionary” tech bros
Evangelicals v atheist/amoral “libertarians”
Russophobic Birchers v Putin lickers
Anti-semite white-nationalist isolationists v Netanyahu fanboys & Christian Zionists
MAGA proletarians expecting improvements v social Darwinist “entrepreneurs” who see them as under-exploited “losers”
Electric vehicle manufacturers v big oil and gas
Nihilist “state smashers” and asset strippers looking to profit from chaos v cop-loving big-budget security fetishists seeking ironclad “stability”
Whilst some of these people have early common goals, most diverge sooner or later.
At the centre of all these clashing worldviews is the court of King Donald, leaning towards the last person who flattered him on a daily basis.
Interesting times ahead.
I always think, where possible, it's important to get people to commit to certain ideas and metrics beforehand, so you have something to hold them to on the other side.All it really shows is that people who vote Trump are more likely to say they feel more hardship. Thing is I would bet money that many of those people will get worse off over the next 4 years, but still say they feel better off.
Can't be long until Joe Rogan is allowed in the room too.Jesus fucking christ, Channel 4 News is reporting Musk is already on some of the calls Trump's having with other leaders.
Jesus fucking christ, Channel 4 News is reporting Musk is already on some of the calls Trump's having with other leaders.
Yeh people should realise he's often a man of his wordI'm surprised that you're surprised. trump is just doing what he said he was going to do. There are no what can be described as surprises ahead.
I’ve made a point of switching to folks which is hopefully more inclusiveAye well, happens here too with 'lads' and 'guys' for example.
The process of changing it requires two thirds of congress and then it has to be ratified by a certain number of the state goverments so i doubt he has the numbers to do it legally. (He could get some "creative interpretation" by friendly judges i suppose)If Trump does manage to change the constitution & run for a 3rd term , then it would be Hello Obama ! & Trump knows he would lose .