Silas Loom
Man with glasses
Nonsense. It can’t be ten years ago.
Not only talking about it, but dismissing out of hand the likelihood that a 1000 year old time lord with a phone box that's bigger on the inside, has a heart and soul, and travels through time, could punch through a diamond wall. Even coming up with the maths to prove it couldn't happen.And yet, here we are talking about the episode 10 years down the line.
ahemNot only talking about it, but dismissing out of hand the likelihood that a 1000 year old time lord with a phone box that's bigger on the inside, has a heart and soul, and travels through time, could punch through a diamond wall. Even coming up with the maths to prove it couldn't happen.
Pssst... somebody tell them it isn't a documentary
One.ahem
Two hearts.
Noob
This is why I didn't like the idea of it becoming more of a fantasy show Any old shit can and will happen at any time.That was very disappointing, and I was expecting to see something along those lines. It's a science fiction show, you have to at least indulge in some science-sounding bullshit to make things stick, even if it is off the back of a fag packet. They didn't even bother with that.
Tate was the best actor, but the threesome with the Ponds was a more interesting dynamic than the traditional female sidekick one, and better companion-centred stories were written for them.
Nonsense. It can’t be ten years ago.
“I’ll watch it no matter how shit it gets” is at least a creed, I suppose. If not one that I can get behind.Some people are upset about Who. It's nothing new, though. It was a time of concern and exasperation during the Colin Baker and Sylvester McCoy years... and wasn't a huge Matt Smith fan either. But what some of us realise (and is why we criticise) is that as fans, we're in it for life. Committed. There's no middle ground when it comes to it.
Which traditional female sidekick dynamic is that?
There have been plenty of male companions and mixed pairs/groups of companions that have worked well, without any of the overblown "companions are special/superhuman" type nonsense.
Don’t be ridiculous. Of course she is. The writing let her down, but she was great.Still a minority, and of course 13 isn’t canon.
That was closer in time to the McCoy era than Gatwa's.
Why have I always thought it was two?One.
I’m nervous. Obviously he wrote some of the best episodes ever, like The Empty Child and Blink. But also some of the worst, and his tenure as show runner was one I wanted over. He favoured the overblown, smartarsery even when it didn’t make sense, and he wrote women as if he’d never met one. I hope this is more like Blink than the Time of the Doctor.Anyway, Moffat tonight. Everything he wrote under RTD previously was a gem, and he’s had plenty of time off to come up with new ideas. If Boom doesn’t make us all happy, we should just close the thread and devote our energies to lobbying for a Blake’s Seven reboot.
Because it is.Why have I always thought it was two?
Aren't we doing this already?and devote our energies to lobbying for a Blake’s Seven reboot.
The TARDIS has two hearts?Because it is.
I thought we were talking about the Doctor. The Doctor has two hearts.The TARDIS has two hearts?
I’m saving it for later. But that’s good to hear.Just watched 'Boom' (it's nice that its on iplayer to wake up to on a Saturday morning)
It's definitely a better episode than the last 2.