existentialist
Tired and unemotional
Like this?That turntable costs £10,000 more than we paid for our house thirty two years ago.
Do you consider yourself an audiophile?
- Thread starter Doctor Carrot
- Start date
8ball
Decolonise colons!
Oh, we’re house-shaming now, are we?
I'd rather have the turntable.
But it's the best turntable. It's made from Francium and stardust.That turntable costs £10,000 more than we paid for our house thirty two years ago.
Sasaferrato
Super Refuser!
Cheeky git! Just because I called you on your bizarre eating habits.
Don't forget the unicorn testicles.
ska invita
back on the other side
this was a fun threadnot really in keeping with the thread, but I just had to show it. 1925 Ultraphone.
turntable porn
i saw this yesterday, and someone reminded me of it a minute ago... http://www.yankodesign.com/2011/01/20/nothing-but-scratch/ post your sexy turntables in this thread
www.urban75.net
petee
no gods, no malarkey
this was a fun thread
turntable porn
i saw this yesterday, and someone reminded me of it a minute ago... http://www.yankodesign.com/2011/01/20/nothing-but-scratch/ post your sexy turntables in this thread
ah! better.
UnderOpenSky
baseline neural therapy
Solid Snake-Oil Storage: This SSD Is Aimed at Audiophiles
This SSD purportedly makes your audio sound better.
www.tomshardware.com
moody
Member of The Underground.
after a couple of years of looking around I have pretty much scored a nice pair of xtz 99.26s. bonus wasn't expecting the sub.
turns out a good mate of mine had them. I was looking for ages, they don't really come up for sale too often, there are a few pairs on hifi shark but they all abroad and the shipping cost just puts them out of reach.
they're pretty decent, were around 700 quid new but made with real quality components, like the ribbon tweeter. they are rated above many £1k sets.
turns out a good mate of mine had them. I was looking for ages, they don't really come up for sale too often, there are a few pairs on hifi shark but they all abroad and the shipping cost just puts them out of reach.
they're pretty decent, were around 700 quid new but made with real quality components, like the ribbon tweeter. they are rated above many £1k sets.
beesonthewhatnow
going deaf for a living
Nice, but unless you’re going to mount them on isolation pods made of unicorn horn tips and wire them with silver thread hand knitted by artisans sat on a lay line, they have no place on this thread 
Last edited:
moody
Member of The Underground.
they are best mounted on stands, I'll give you that.Nice, but unless you’re going to mount them on isolation pods made of unicorn horn tips and wire them with silver thread hand knitted by artisans sat on a lay line, they have no place on this thread
danski
"vibey"
That’s funny, because I read a review that said hen’s teeth are best for isolation.Nice, but unless you’re going to mount them on isolation pods made of unicorn horn tips and wired with silver thread hand knitted by artisans sat on a lay line, they have no place on this thread
Cid
Proper break this time
This is true, but hen's teeth need to be damped with rocking horse shit, so many find unicorn more practical.
8ball
Decolonise colons!
There is, but you need to be in space encased in a graphene tesseract approximately 72 miles from speakers 1,408 feet in diameter.
Which is not cost-effective given the marginal performance boost over wireless earbuds.
wemakeyousoundb
hopefully not gimboid
look at an external passive cross over, might have to be a bespoke thing though rather than off the shelf solution.
also to keep on topic:
fairy dust
danski
"vibey"
Last edited:
beesonthewhatnow
going deaf for a living
Has the sub not got a loop through output?
ATOMIC SUPLEX
Member Since: 1985 Post Count: 3
That's the Watson effect for you.
existentialist
Tired and unemotional
Yebbut, are they nano-oxygen depleted carboniferous soundscape-ready unobtainium?I've spent all my life listening to music through headphones costing less than £40.
Just bought myself a £250+ pair as I wanted noise cancelling that worked, and the difference is quite exciting..
ETA: I'm slighty worried there may be no going back.
Otherwise, they have no place on this thread. Come back when you've spent two orders of magnitude more on them
wemakeyousoundb
hopefully not gimboid
as long as you don't go forward you are in the sweet spot.I've spent all my life listening to music through headphones costing less than £40.
Just bought myself a £250+ pair as I wanted noise cancelling that worked, and the difference is quite exciting..
ETA: I'm slighty worried there may be no going back.
e2a to stay on topic:
unicorn breath stage-sounding will bankrupt you
Hollis
bloody furious
Blimey! I'm very impressed with the noise-cancelling as well. My early morning doze in bed was being ruined by the noise of rat-running cars. With these things on I can listen to the radio in peace! - No traffic noise at all..
These are the headphones:
There's a newer model out there..
These are the headphones:
Sony WH-1000XM4 Noise Cancelling
There's a newer model out there..
Monkeygrinder's Organ
Dodgy geezer swilling vapid lager
I've spent all my life listening to music through headphones costing less than £40.
Just bought myself a £250+ pair as I wanted noise cancelling that worked, and the difference is quite exciting..
ETA: I'm slighty worried there may be no going back.
£250 headphones have no place on this thread.
That's the starting price for a cable around here.
bmd
Island in the stream.
Don't bother with the mermaid's breath then, noob?Nice, but unless you’re going to mount them on isolation pods made of unicorn horn tips and wire them with silver thread hand knitted by artisans sat on a lay line, they have no place on this thread
