I see they make directional cables
I honestly don't know how I'd react if someone told me that in person.I see they make directional cables
I see they make directional cables
I see they make directional cables
I honestly don't know how I'd react if someone told me that in person.
I hope it never happens or they might see that despite directionality, those cable can still tie a mighty fine noose.
A broken limb would’ve sufficed.A Maplins shop assistant/salesman once tried to flannel me about directionality, claiming you needed to check the resistivity of a length of speaker cable, & have the "path of least resistance" directed from amp to speaker. I walked out of the shop. Couldn't be bothered to tell him that a length of cable would have the same resistance in both directions!
never noticed any direction on their tour stuff, but I guess this is for the hifi specialist market.I see they make directional cables
never noticed any direction on their tour stuff, but I guess this is for the hifi specialist market.
trade price never is on the webstoreNone of the VDC cable we used on installs was directional either. They've obviously realised there are suckers to fleece.
I must have installed several hundred km of this...(trade price is not as shown on the webstore).
FFYnever noticed any direction on their tour stuff, but I guess this is for the deluded bullshitters.
If they had one for donk I'd be tempted to invest
Your local charity shop would be my suggestion, but you can pick up any number of them on ebay for less than 50 quid. They're cheap as chips because nobody uses them anymore, and they all sound pretty much exactly the same, so spending silly money on one is silly.recommendations on a half decent cd player, ideally with a dac . looking to buy second hand, have a budget of around a hundred quid.
Imperceptible differences, although audiophools will say otherwise.I'm not sure about them all sounding the same either, even though in my experience I haven't been able to tell the difference... It would makes sense that they would all sound the same if it was an all-digital device, but because most of them have an internal DAC (and so are doing a conversion and outputting an analogue signal) then surely that must be a variable? That's not audiophile bullshit, it will definitely vary.
I bet if you fed audio through a DAC, then fed that signal through an ADC, and then did that a few times, eventually the audio would be degraded... like when you convert an image to a jpeg a few times. anyway that is irrelevant for most uses though.Imperceptible differences, although audiophools will say otherwise.
No. Not if the DAC and ADC are working.I bet if you fed audio through a DAC, then fed that signal through an ADC, and then did that a few times, eventually the audio would be degraded... like when you convert an image to a jpeg a few times. anyway that is irrelevant for most uses though.
You should be able to pick up a marantz cd player for about that, that'd be my go to. Alternatively get one of the old Denon mini units, I got one of those off eBay for about £50 to use as an amp and it's great.
If you sprinkle my Magic Audio Staging Depth Dust Improver ™ on the case then it will, only £599 for 5cc of it.Imperceptible differences, although audiophools will say otherwise.
badly soI think this thread has gone a little bit off-topic
hold your horses, let's see what CD player moody will get.I think this thread has gone a little bit off-topic
Anything. Unless a CD player is one of the very early ones, or broken, they all sound the same. Only difference might be better made ones having less physical transport noise, which would only really be an issue when listening at low volumes/music with a large dynamic range like classical.recommendations on a half decent cd player, ideally with a dac . looking to buy second hand, have a budget of around a hundred quid.
Anything. Unless a CD player is one of the very early ones, or broken, they all sound the same. Only difference might be better made ones having less physical transport noise, which would only really be an issue when listening at low volumes/music with a large dynamic range like classical.
($50 for 200 treatments)The application of Auric Illuminator is an easy, two-step process. The first step is permanent except that the black ink can be removed using isopropyl alcohol. The applied gel in step two is semi permanent. However, for optimal performance it is recommended that the gel be re-applied for each playing, assuming a day has passed since the last playing.
The first step reduces ambient light and infrared light in the disc material. The Auric Illuminator light absorbing pen is used to blacken the inside and outside edges of the CD. (The outside rim and the inside of the center hole). This improves the signal to noise ratio of the reflected signal allowing for more accurate timing of the retrieved data.
The second step involves the application of Auric Illuminator gel. This unique product improves the optics by allowing laser light to enter and leave the disc with less reflection or scattering. This allows the pickup to "see" a stronger, more sharply defined signal resulting in fewer data retrieval errors.
($125 for each bottle, can't work out if you need both or if they are marketed for different purposes somehow, doesn't say how many treatments it gives you)Ripping following Essence of Music application reveals and permanently captures enhanced details, spatial cues, and ambient intimacies of a live event to your media server – delicacies always present, but obscured within your disc, prior to Essence of Music application.